Article

Evaluation of the presence of drugs of abuse in tap waters

AGBAR, Gral, Batet 5-7, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Chemosphere (Impact Factor: 3.5). 06/2011; 84(11):1601-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.033
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A total of seventy samples of drinking water were tested for non-controlled and illicit drugs. Of these, 43 were from Spanish cities, 15 from seven other European countries, three from Japan and nine from seven different Latin American countries. The most frequently detected compounds were caffeine, nicotine, cotinine, cocaine and its metabolite benzoylecgonine, methadone and its metabolite EDDP. The mean concentrations of non-controlled drugs were: for caffeine 50 and 19 ng L(-1), in Spanish and worldwide drinking water respectively and for nicotine 13 and 19 ng L(-1). Illicit drugs were sparsely present and usually at ultratrace level (<1 ng L(-1)). For example, cocaine has mean values of 0.4 (Spain) and 0.3 ng L(-1) (worldwide), whereas for benzoylecgonine, these mean values were 0.4 and 1.8 ng L(-1), respectively. Higher concentrations of benzoylecgonine were found in Latin American samples (up to 15 ng L(-1)). No opiates were identified in any sample but the presence of methadone and EDDP was frequently detected. Total mean values for EDDP were 0.4 ng L(-1) (Spain) and 0.3 ng L(-1) (worldwide). Very few samples tested positive for amphetamines, in line with the reactivity of chlorine with these compounds. No cannabinoids, LSD, ketamine, fentanyl and PCP were detected.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
115 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A simultaneous determination method of 14 multi-class pharmaceuticals using solid-phase extraction (SPE) followed by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometer (HPLC-MS/MS) was established to measure the occurrence and distribution of these pharmaceuticals in tap water and a drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) in Beijing, China. Target compounds included seven anti-inflammatory drugs, two antibacterial drugs, two lipid regulation drugs, one antiepileptic drug, and one hormone. Limits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantitation (LOQs) ranged from 0.01 to 1.80 ng/L and 0.05 to 3.00 ng/L, respectively. Intraday and inter-day precisions, recoveries of different matrices, and matrix effects were also investigated. Of the 14 pharmaceutical compounds selected, nine were identified in tap water of Beijing downtown with the concentration up to 38.24 ng/L (carbamazepine), and the concentration levels of detected pharmaceuticals in tap water (<5 ng/L for most pharmaceuticals) were lower than previous studies in other countries. In addition, ten and six pharmaceuticals were measured in raw water and finished water at the concentration ranged from 0.10 to 16.23 and 0.13 to 17.17 ng/L, respectively. Five compounds were detected most frequently in DWTP, namely antipyrine, carbamazepine, isopropylantipyrine, aminopyrine, and bezafibrate. Ibuprofen was found to be the highest concentration pharmaceutical during DWTP, up to 53.30 ng/L. DWTP shows a positive effect on the removal of most pharmaceuticals with 81.2-99.5 % removal efficiencies, followed by carbamazepine with 55.4 % removal efficiency, but it has no effect for removing ibuprofen and bezafibrate.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research 09/2014; DOI:10.1007/s11356-014-3473-8 · 2.76 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We review the current methods developed for the analysis of legal and illegal drugs (LIDs) and their metabolites in environmental samples. We discuss the advantages and the pitfalls of multi-class methods with emphasis on new strategies for sample preparation and recent technical developments. Finally, we present the applicability of these methods to the analysis of LIDs in protected environmental areas.
    TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 10/2013; 50:65-77. DOI:10.1016/j.trac.2013.04.008 · 6.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The reaction kinetics and reaction pathway of methadone and its main human metabolite, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) in chlorine containing waters were investigated by direct injection of individual reaction time aliquots in a liquid chromatography-quadrupole-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) system. Factors potentially affecting the rate of the reaction were evaluated in detail by means of a Box-Behnken experimental design in which methadone and EDDP were considered separately. Sample pH and chlorine concentration turned out to be the two significant variables, enhancing the kinetics with an increase in their values. Transformation products (TPs) were first searched over sample chromatograms by comparing control, blank and time zero samples to aliquots stopped at different reaction times. Their tentative identity was further inferred by generating their empirical formulae from their accurate single MS spectra and, subsequently, by interpreting their fragmentation pattern from their tandem MS (MS/MS) spectra. In total, 8 TPs, arising from intra-molecular cyclation, dehydrogenation, oxidation and chlorination, could be detected in the case of methadone, one of them being the EDDP and another 3 coming from EDDP, so being common to both the precursor drug and its metabolite. A tentative transformation pathway was proposed, and the reaction was evaluated under potential real circumstances by chlorinating two different river samples. In this way, it was possible to demonstrate that its extension is highly affected by the content of dissolved organic matter, so both compounds were highly or completely transformed in samples with a low anthropogenic impact, whereas they were considerably more stable in waters with a high concentration of organic matter. Finally, the ecotoxicity of precursors and transformation species was predicted by software tools, revealing that, in some cases, the toxicological responses displayed by the TPs were up to 100 times higher than those of methadone. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Water Research 11/2014; 68C:759-770. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2014.10.058 · 5.32 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
18 Downloads
Available from
Oct 22, 2014