Article

Universal GFR determination based on two time points during plasma iohexol disappearance

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kidney International (Impact Factor: 8.52). 06/2011; 80(4):423-30. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2011.155
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT An optimal measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) should minimize the number of blood draws, and reduce procedural invasiveness and the burden to study personnel and cost, without sacrificing accuracy. Equations have been proposed to calculate GFR from the slow compartment separately for adults and children. To develop a universal equation, we used 1347 GFR measurements from two diverse groups consisting of 527 men in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study and 514 children in the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children cohort. Both studies used nearly identical two-compartment (fast and slow) protocols to measure GFR. To estimate the fast component from markers of body size and of the slow component, we used standard linear regression methods with the log-transformed fast area as the dependent variable. The fast area could be accurately estimated from body surface area by a simple parameter (6.4/body surface area) with no residual dependence on the slow area or other markers of body size. Our equation measures only the slow iohexol plasma disappearance curve with as few as two time points and was normalized to 1.73 m2 body surface area. It is of the form: GFR=slowGFR/[1+0.12(slowGFR/100)]. In a random sample utilizing a third of the patients for validation, there was excellent agreement between the calculated and measured GFR with low root mean square errors being 4.6 and 1.5 ml/min per 1.73 m2 for adults and children, respectively. Thus, our proposed simple equation, developed in a combined patient group with a broad range of GFRs, may be applied universally and is independent of the injected amount of iohexol.

Full-text

Available from: Derek K Ng, May 30, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
215 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Formal evaluation of kidney function before and after hematopoietic cell transplant is important to determine conditioning regimens, type of transplant, and medication dosing. Serum creatinine and estimating equations may not accurately assess kidney function. Existing estimating equations for GFR were compared with an iohexol measure of GFR in a prospective cohort study of 50 patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant and subsequent care at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Institute from 2009 to 2013. Patients underwent iohexol GFR, serum creatinine, and cystatin C determination at baseline and day 100 posthematopoietic cell transplant. Iohexol GFR measurements were compared with the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration, Inker CKD Epidemiology Collaboration cystatin C with and without serum creatinine, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, and Cockcroft-Gault estimating equations using Bland-Altman analysis and McNemar's test. The iohexol measurements were also compared with blood samples collected simultaneously on filter paper. Mean differences between iohexol GFR and eGFR on the basis of Bland-Altman analyses ranged from -20.6 to +15.4 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) at baseline and -12.7 to +12.9 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) at day 100. The CKD Epidemiology Collaboration and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease estimating equations classified 64% of patients with a GFR<90 at baseline compared with 38% by iohexol GFR (P=0.003 and P<0.01, respectively). No statistically significant differences were seen at day 100. The filter paper GFR had a mean difference of 0 at baseline and 5.9 at day 100. Additionally, 21%-37% and 57%-89% of eGFRs were within 10% and 30%, respectively, of the iohexol GFR at baseline, and 16%-34% and 72%-84% were within 10% and 30%, respectively, of the iohexol GFR at day 100; 98% of the filter paper estimates at baseline were within 30%, and 46% were within 10% of iohexol GFR. The estimating equations are neither accurate nor precise in the hematopoietic cell transplant population, and clinical decision may require measurement of GFR. Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Nephrology.
    Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 02/2015; 10(4). DOI:10.2215/CJN.06470614 · 5.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: CKD identification after pediatric heart transplantation (PHT) is limited by inaccuracies in estimates of GFR. We hypothesized that GFR can be measured by a modified iohexol clearance protocol in PHT recipients and that the CKiD formula provides a better estimate of GFR than other estimating equations. A cross-sectional study of PHT recipients, ages 2–18 yr, undergoing coronary angiography was undertaken. The angiography dose of iohexol was divided by the area under the curve from three iohexol levels post-infusion to calculate GFR. Agreement between iGFR and multiple estimating equations (eGFR) was assessed. In 31 subjects, median age was 15.0 yr (IQR 7.6, 16.6). Mean iGFR was 93.8 (s.d. 22.5) mL/min/1.73 m2; 16 (52%) had an iGFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m2. The full CKiD formula (mean eGFR 88.9, s.d. 14.9) had low bias (−5.0), narrowest 95% limits of agreement (−42.0, 32.1), highest 30% (94%) and 10% (52%) accuracy, and highest correlation coefficient (0.576) relative to iGFR. We describe a novel modified iohexol clearance method to assess GFR after PHT. Over half of the cohort had an iGFR <90, suggesting CKD. The full CKiD formula performs best with respect to bias, accuracy, and correlation.
    Pediatric Transplantation 08/2014; 18(7). DOI:10.1111/petr.12331 · 1.63 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Renal function is often estimated using one of several glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations. However, there is no consensus which estimating equation performs best in patients with advanced renal failure. We compared the performance of five different estimated GFR (eGFR) equations [Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Mayo Clinic and Lund-Malmö] with measured GFR (plasma iohexol clearance) in 2098 referred CKD patients with mGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2). There were 398 patients with an mGFR ≤10 mL/min/1.73 m(2), 1974 with a measured GFR (mGFR) 11-20 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 749 patients with mGFR 21-30 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Across the entire range, the median bias of eGFR was lowest for the Lund-Malmö equation (0.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), followed by the CKD-EPI (1.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), the MDRD (1.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), Mayo Clinic equation (1.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and Cockcroft-Gault equation (4.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). The best accuracy within 30% of mGFR was also for Lund-Malmö (76%), while it was similar for CKD-EPI, MDRD and Mayo (65-67%). The Cockcroft-Gault had the worst accuracy of only ∼54%.The median bias was stable across mGFR categories, while the accuracy within 30% of mGFR became worse with decreasing mGFR. All equations performed best among patients with hereditary kidney diseases and tubulointerstitial disease. Accuracy was generally worse for patients >65 years of age and for those with diabetic nephropathy. In patients with advanced renal failure, the GFR-estimating equations show reasonably good performance on the population level. On the individual patient level, they are inaccurate, especially in elderly patients and those with diabetic nephropathy.
    Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 07/2013; DOI:10.1093/ndt/gft226 · 3.49 Impact Factor