Article

Clipping of MCA aneurysms: how I do it.

Service de Neurochirurgie, Département de Neurosciences Cliniques, Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Faculté de médecine, Université de Genève, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Acta Neurochirurgica (Impact Factor: 1.55). 07/2011; 153(7):1361-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-011-1063-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Aneurysms located at the middle cerebral artery bifurcation remain a clear neurosurgical indication. We detail here the steps necessary to enable safe surgery for Sylvian fissure aneurysms.
An angiogram with 3D reconstruction is obtained and reviewed intraoperatively, just prior to the skin incision. During the exposure, the cistern is kept open by small cottonoids, thereby avoiding brain retraction. Continuous monitoring of MEPs along with ICG microscopic angio-fluorescence allows for detection of vascular compromise. Intraoperative angiography with 3D reconstruction allows for immediate correction of less than satisfactory surgical outcome.
Careful planning of surgical strategy followed by a minimally invasive technique (with continuous neuro-monitoring) ensures safe surgery. The availability of intra-operative radiological guidance allows for optimal management.

1 Bookmark
 · 
236 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the May 2009 issue of The Lancet Neurology, the 5-year follow-up results of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) were published. The authors concluded that, although the significant difference between coiling and neurosurgical clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in terms of death and severe disability after 1 year has vanished (primary endpoint), coiling should still be favored over neurosurgical clipping because mortality rates significantly favored coiling. In this commentary, it is this particular conclusion that is challenged by combining data from previous ISAT publications with the current 5-year follow-up results. This modified intent-to-treat analysis clearly demonstrates that the significant advantage in terms of mortality in favor of the endovascularly treated patients is no longer present, with a hazard ratio of 0.80 in favor of endovascular treatment (95% confidence interval: 0.60-1.05; P = .10). Therefore, for everyday clinical practice and decision making, coiling and clipping are to be considered equivalent in the long term.
    Neurosurgery 05/2010; 66(5):961-2. · 2.53 Impact Factor
  • Journal of Neurosurgery 05/2007; 106(4):734-5; author reply 735. · 3.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Pipeline embolization device (PED) (Chestnut Medical Technologies, Inc., Menlo Park, CA) is a new microcatheter-delivered endovascular construct designed to achieve the curative reconstruction of the parent arteries giving rise to wide-necked and fusiform intracranial aneurysms. We present our initial periprocedural experience with the PED and midterm follow-up results for a series of 53 patients. Patients harboring large and giant wide-necked, nonsaccular, and recurrent intracranial aneurysms were selected for treatment. All patients were pretreated with dual antiplatelet medications for at least 72 hours before surgery and continued taking both agents for at least 6 months after treatment. A control digital subtraction angiogram was typically performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Fifty-three patients (age range, 11-77 years; average age, 55.2 years; 48 female) with 63 intracranial aneurysms were treated with the PED. Small (n = 33), large (n = 22), and giant (n = 8) wide-necked aneurysms were included. A total of 72 PEDs were used. Treatment was achieved with a single PED in 44 aneurysms, with 2 overlapping PEDs in 17 aneurysms, and with 3 overlapping PEDs in 2 aneurysms. The mean time between the treatment and last follow-up digital subtraction angiogram was 5.9 months (range, 1-22 months). Complete angiographic occlusion was achieved in 56%, 93%, and 95% of aneurysms at 3 (n = 42), 6 (n = 28), and 12 (n = 18) months, respectively. The only aneurysm that remained patent at the time of the 12-month follow-up examination had been treated previously with stent-supported coiling. The presence of a preexisting endoluminal stent may have limited the efficacy of the PED reconstruction in this aneurysm. No aneurysms demonstrated a deterioration of angiographic occlusion during the follow-up period (i.e., no recanalizations). No major complications (stroke or death) were encountered during the study period. Three patients (5%), all with giant aneurysms, experienced transient exacerbations of preexisting cranial neuropathies and headache after the PED treatment. All 3 were treated with corticosteroids, and these symptoms resolved within 1 month. Endovascular reconstruction with the PED represents a safe, durable, and curative treatment of selected wide-necked, large and giant cerebral aneurysms. The rate of complete occlusion at the time of the 12-month follow-up examination approached 100% in the present study. To date, no angiographic recurrences have been observed during serial angiographic follow-up.
    Neurosurgery 05/2009; 64(4):632-42; discussion 642-3; quiz N6. · 2.53 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
147 Downloads
Available from
Jun 1, 2014