Article

Deletion of interleukin-6 improves pyruvate tolerance without altering hepatic insulin signaling in the leptin receptor-deficient mouse

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Metabolism: clinical and experimental (Impact Factor: 3.61). 05/2011; 60(11):1610-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2011.04.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Obesity is associated with increased circulating interleukin-6 (IL-6), which may contribute to hepatic insulin resistance by impairing insulin receptor signaling. This study was designed to assess the impact of the systemic absence of IL-6 on the development of insulin resistance and glucose intolerance in an obese mouse model. Systemic insulin, glucose, and pyruvate tolerance tests were performed in IL-6 knockout (IL6KO) mice that had been crossed with a genetically obese (leptin receptor-deficient mouse model [Lep(db)]) mouse model. Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis assessed cellular and molecular markers of insulin signaling, inflammation, and metabolism. Absence of IL-6 did not improve systemic glucose or insulin tolerance, but Lep(db) × IL6KO mice displayed a smaller blood glucose increase following a pyruvate challenge. These results suggest that loss of IL-6 in the context of obesity may locally reduce hepatic glucose production from a gluconeogenic precursor. Hepatic insulin-dependent insulin receptor autophosphorylation, Akt activation, and FoxO1 phosphorylation were similar between Lep(db) × IL6KO mice and Lep(db) controls. Basal gene expression of the gluconeogenic enzyme phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase was reduced in male Lep(db) × IL6KO mice relative to Lep(db) controls; but gene expression of another regulatory enzyme, glucose-6-phosphatase, remained unaltered. Absence of IL-6 reduced gene expression of serum amyloid A and RelA in female Lep(db) mice, but did not alter hepatic triglyceride accumulation or lipogenic gene expression. Overall, our results suggest that IL-6 may be detrimental in obesity by contributing to elevated hepatic glucose output.

Full-text

Available from: Leonidas G Koniaris, Feb 25, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
96 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: IntroductionImpaired healing and non-union of skeletal fractures is a major public health problem, with morbidity exacerbated in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). DM is prevalent worldwide and affects approximately 25.8 million US adults, with >90% having obesity-related type 2 DM (T2DM). While fracture healing in type 1 DM (T1DM) has been studied using animal models, an investigation into delayed healing in an animal model of T2DM has not yet been performed.MethodsMale C57BL/6J mice at 5 weeks of age were placed on either a control lean diet or an experimental high-fat diet (HFD) for 12 weeks. A mid-diaphyseal open tibia fracture was induced at 17 weeks of age and a spinal needle was used for intra-medullary fixation. Mice were sacrificed at days 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, and 35 for micro-computed tomography (μCT), histology-based histomorphometry and molecular analyses, and biomechanical testing.ResultsHFD-fed mice displayed increased body weight and impaired glucose tolerance, both characteristic of T2DM. Compared to control mice, HFD-fed mice with tibia fractures showed significantly (p<0.001) decreased woven bone at day 28 by histomorphometry and significantly (p<0.01) decreased callus bone volume at day 21 by μCT. Interestingly, fracture calluses contained markedly increased adiposity in HFD-fed mice at days 21, 28, and 35. HFD-fed mice also showed increased PPARγ immunohistochemical staining at day 14. Finally, calluses from HFD-fed mice at day 35 showed significantly (p<0.01) reduced torsional rigidity compared to controls.DiscussionOur murine model of T2DM demonstrated delayed fracture healing and weakened biomechanical properties, and was distinctly characterized by increased callus adiposity. This suggests altered mesenchymal stem cell fate determination with a shift to the adipocyte lineage at the expense of the osteoblast lineage. The up-regulation of PPARγ in fracture calluses of HFD-fed mice is likely involved in the proposed fate switching.
    PLoS ONE 06/2014; 9(6):e99656. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0099656 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic inflammation is an important contributor to the development and progression of metabolic syndrome. Recent evidence indicates that, in addition to innate immune cells, adaptive immune cells have an important role in this process. We previously showed that the serum level of B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) was increased in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. However, it is currently unknown whether BAFF and BAFF-R (BAFF-R) have a role in lipid metabolism in the liver. To address this issue, the role played by BAFF and BAFF-R signaling in the development of insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis was examined in BAFF-R(-/-) mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD). Furthermore, the effect of BAFF on lipid metabolism in hepatocytes was analyzed in vitro. BAFF-R(-/-) mice showed improvements in HFD-induced obesity and insulin resistance. In addition, the number of B cells, levels of serum IgG, and inflammation of visceral fat were reduced in these mice. However, the expression of steatogenic genes and fatty acid deposition in the liver was higher in these mice than in control mice. BAFF was also found to downregulate the expression of steatogenesis genes and enhance steatosis in hepatocytes through BAFF-R. Collectively, these data indicated that, in addition to its known functions in inflammation and glucose metabolism, BAFF has a protective role in hepatic steatosis by regulating lipid metabolism in the liver.Laboratory Investigation advance online publication, 14 January 2013; doi:10.1038/labinvest.2012.176.
    Laboratory Investigation 01/2013; DOI:10.1038/labinvest.2012.176 · 3.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Metabolism: clinical and experimental 09/2012; 61(12). DOI:10.1016/j.metabol.2012.09.001 · 3.61 Impact Factor