gp100 Peptide Vaccine and Interleukin-2 in Patients with Advanced Melanoma

Indiana University Health Goshen Center for Cancer Care, Goshen, IN 46526, USA.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 55.87). 06/2011; 364(22):2119-27. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1012863
Source: PubMed


Stimulating an immune response against cancer with the use of vaccines remains a challenge. We hypothesized that combining a melanoma vaccine with interleukin-2, an immune activating agent, could improve outcomes. In a previous phase 2 study, patients with metastatic melanoma receiving high-dose interleukin-2 plus the gp100:209-217(210M) peptide vaccine had a higher rate of response than the rate that is expected among patients who are treated with interleukin-2 alone.
We conducted a randomized, phase 3 trial involving 185 patients at 21 centers. Eligibility criteria included stage IV or locally advanced stage III cutaneous melanoma, expression of HLA*A0201, an absence of brain metastases, and suitability for high-dose interleukin-2 therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive interleukin-2 alone (720,000 IU per kilogram of body weight per dose) or gp100:209-217(210M) plus incomplete Freund's adjuvant (Montanide ISA-51) once per cycle, followed by interleukin-2. The primary end point was clinical response. Secondary end points included toxic effects and progression-free survival.
The treatment groups were well balanced with respect to baseline characteristics and received a similar amount of interleukin-2 per cycle. The toxic effects were consistent with those expected with interleukin-2 therapy. The vaccine-interleukin-2 group, as compared with the interleukin-2-only group, had a significant improvement in centrally verified overall clinical response (16% vs. 6%, P=0.03), as well as longer progression-free survival (2.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 3.9 vs. 1.6 months; 95% CI, 1.5 to 1.8; P=0.008). The median overall survival was also longer in the vaccine-interleukin-2 group than in the interleukin-2-only group (17.8 months; 95% CI, 11.9 to 25.8 vs. 11.1 months; 95% CI, 8.7 to 16.3; P=0.06).
In patients with advanced melanoma, the response rate was higher and progression-free survival longer with vaccine and interleukin-2 than with interleukin-2 alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; number, NCT00019682.).

Download full-text


Available from: Brendan D Curti,
1 Follower
70 Reads
  • Source
    • "Table 2.2 Spectrum of current vaccine platforms in Phase II/III clinical studies—cont'd Vaccine platform Example Cancer type References Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) Yeast ras Pancreatic Remondo et al. (2009), Wansley et al. (2008) Listeria Listeria mesothelin Pancreatic Singh and Paterson (2006) Alpha-and adenoviruses Adeno-CEA, alpha-CEA Carcinoma MacDonald and Johnston (2000) Peptides/proteins Peptide gp100 (modified), MUC-1 (Stimuvax), HER2/neu Melanoma, lung Disis (2009), Butts et al. (2005), Pejawar-Gaddy et al. (2010), Finn et al. (2011), Schwartzentruber et al. (2011), Sosman et al. (2008), Salazar et al. (2009), Brichard and Lejeune (2008), Disis (2011) "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Therapeutic cancer vaccines have the potential of being integrated in the therapy of numerous cancer types and stages. The wide spectrum of vaccine platforms and vaccine targets is reviewed along with the potential for development of vaccines to target cancer cell "stemness," the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype, and drug-resistant populations. Preclinical and recent clinical studies are now revealing how vaccines can optimally be used with other immune-based therapies such as checkpoint inhibitors, and so-called nonimmune-based therapeutics, radiation, hormonal therapy, and certain small molecule targeted therapies; it is now being revealed that many of these traditional therapies can lyse tumor cells in a manner as to further potentiate the host immune response, alter the phenotype of nonlysed tumor cells to render them more susceptible to T-cell lysis, and/or shift the balance of effector:regulatory cells in a manner to enhance vaccine efficacy. The importance of the tumor microenvironment, the appropriate patient population, and clinical trial endpoints is also discussed in the context of optimizing patient benefit from vaccine-mediated therapy.
    Advances in Cancer Research 06/2014; 121:67-124. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-800249-0.00002-0 · 5.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The triple combination of a TLR7 agonist, CD40 agonist and IL-2 was critical for the induction of effective anti-tumor immunity as we recently reported (Hailemichael et al., 2013). However, most clinical trials of peptide or protein vaccines thus far have used IFA and TLR agonist (Speiser et al., 2005) or TLR agonist and anti-CD40 (Ahonen et al., 2004) or IL-2 (Schwartzentruber et al., 2011), but never this powerful triple combination (covax). If the murine system is at all predictive of human T cell responses, the full potential of anti-tumor T cell responses will not be unlocked until multiple synergistic immunostimulators, which by themselves may prove quite weak, are combined (Mellman et al., 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cancer vaccines can induce robust activation of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells that can destroy tumors. Understanding the mechanism by which cancer vaccines work is essential in designing next-generation vaccines with more potent therapeutic activity. We recently reported that short peptides emulsified in poorly biodegradable, Incomplete Freund's Adjuvant (IFA) primed CD8+ T cells that did not localize to the tumor site but accumulated at the persisting, antigen-rich vaccination site. The vaccination site eventually became a T cell graveyard where T cells responded to chronically released gp100 peptide by releasing cytokines, including interferon - γ (IFN-γ), which in turn upregulated Fas ligand (FasL) on host cells, causing apoptosis of Fas(+) T cells. T cells that escaped apoptosis rapidly became exhausted, memory formation was poor, and therapeutic impact was minimal. Replacing the non-biodegradable IFA-based formulation with water-based, short-lived formulation in the presence of immunostimulatory molecules allowed T cells to traffic to tumors, causing their regression. In this review, we discuss recent advances in immunotherapeutic approaches that could enhance vaccine-primed immune cells fitness and render the tumor microenvironment more accessible for immune cell infiltration.
    The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology 05/2014; 53. DOI:10.1016/j.biocel.2014.04.019 · 4.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "However, a similar regimen could lead to an opposite effect with the accumulation of TREG and CD8+ T-cells in tumors (27, 28). A phase III study of melanoma patients using a gp100 peptide vaccine with interleukin (IL)-2 administration led to equally promising results with discovery of TREG expansion in responding patients (29). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is recently shown that beneficial environmental microbes stimulate integrated immune and neuroendocrine factors throughout the body, consequently modulating regulatory T-lymphocyte phenotypes, maintaining systemic immune balance, and determining the fate of preneoplastic lesions toward regression while sustaining whole body good health. Stimulated by a gut microbiota-centric systemic homeostasis hypothesis, we set out to explore the influence of the gut microbiome to explain the paradoxical roles of regulatory T-lymphocytes in cancer development and growth. This paradigm shift places cancer prevention and treatment into a new broader context of holobiont engineering to cultivate a tumor-suppressive macroenvironment.
    Frontiers in Immunology 04/2014; 5:157. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2014.00157
Show more