Article

Unpacking the hedonic paradox: A dynamic analysis of the relationships between financial capital, social capital and life satisfaction.

Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK University of Exeter, UK University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
British Journal of Social Psychology (Impact Factor: 1.76). 05/2011; DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02035.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Does money buy happiness? Or is happiness derived from looking outwards towards our social networks? Many researchers have answered these questions by exploring whether the best predictor of well-being is either economic or social (or some fixed combination of the two). This paper argues for a dynamic perspective on the capacity for economic and social factors to predict well-being. In two studies, we show that both money (individual income) and community (social capital) can be the basis for individual happiness. However, the relative influence of each factor depends on the context within which happiness is considered, and how this shapes the way people define the self. Study 1 primes either money or community in the laboratory and demonstrates that such priming shifts individual values (so that they are economic vs. communal) and determines the extent to which income is more (vs. less) predictive of life satisfaction than social relations. Study 2 looks at these same priming processes in the external world (with people travelling to vs. from work). Both studies show that while money can become the basis of happiness when the self is defined in economic terms, the role of community relations in predicting happiness is more stable across contexts.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
274 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper exploits the richness and large sample size of the Gallup/Healthways US daily poll to illustrate significant differences in the dynamics of two key measures of subjective well-being: emotions and life evaluations. We find that there is no day-of-week effect for life evaluations, represented here by the Cantril Ladder, but significantly more happiness, enjoyment, and laughter, and significantly less worry, sadness, and anger on weekends (including public holidays) than on weekdays. We then find strong evidence of the importance of the social context, both at work and at home, in explaining the size and likely determinants of the weekend effects for emotions. Weekend effects are twice as large for full-time paid workers as for the rest of the population, and are much smaller for those whose work supervisor is considered a partner rather than a boss and who report trustable and open work environments. A large portion of the weekend effects is explained by differences in the amount of time spent with friends or family between weekends and weekdays (7.1 vs. 5.4 hours). The extra daily social time of 1.7 hours in weekends raises average happiness by about 2%.Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
    Social Indicators Research 07/2011; · 1.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research on the determinants and implications of career success, and in particular on how they are related to health among Chinese workers is scarce. This research explores the impact and relevance of individual attitudes of trust and organizational citizenship behavior on objective and subjective career success, and their relevance to physical and mental health. Further, we explore the moderating role of career system on the relationships between work attitudes and career success. Using a random sample of 10372 people in China we used multi-level linear regression methodology to explore a mediation-moderation model based on organizational theories. We found support for the impact of organizational citizenship behaviors and trust, for both objective and subjective career success as mediators of mental and physical health, and for career system as a moderator, with significant differences emerging between workers employed in the public and private sectors. The results are important as they shed light on relationship between work and life attitudes on outcomes of high relevance at national level. The original contribution would be of interest to policy makers at both organizational and national level.
    Journal of Vocational Behavior 02/2014; 84(3):248-258. · 2.82 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

View
34 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014