The complexities of TGF-β action during mammary and squamous cell carcinogenesis.

Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, California 94143-0512, USA.
Current pharmaceutical biotechnology (Impact Factor: 2.51). 05/2011; 12(12):2138-49. DOI: 10.2174/138920111798808284
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Many advanced tumors produce excess amounts of Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β), which is a potent growth inhibitor of normal epithelial cells. However, in tumors its homeostatic action on cells can be diverted along several alternative pathways. Thus, TGF-β signaling has been reported to elicit a preventative or tumor suppressive effect during the earlier stages of tumorigenesis, but later in tumor development, when carcinoma cells become refractory to TGF-β-mediated growth inhibition, response to TGF-β signaling elicits predominantly tumor progressing effects. This is not a simple switch from suppression to progression, but more like a rheostat, involving multiple complementary and antagonizing activities that slowly tip the balance from one to the other. This review will focus on the multiple activities of TGF-β in regulation of two epithelial tumor types, namely squamous cell carcinoma and breast cancer. Basic findings in current mouse models of cancer are presented, as well as a discussion of the complicating issue of outcome of altered TGFβ signaling depending on genetic variability between mouse strains. This review also discusses the role TGF-β within the tumor microenvironment particularly its ability to polarize the microenvironment towards a pro-tumorigenic milieu.

Download full-text


Available from: Rosemary J Akhurst, May 14, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cancer cells that disseminate to metastatic sites may progress to frank metastasis or persist as dormant micrometastasis. Significant progress has been made in defining the genetic and phenotypic cancer-cell-autonomous determinants of metastasis and in the understanding of the cross-talk between metastasizing tumor cells and the metastatic microenvironment. However several questions remain open, in particular the identity of microenvironmental factors that keep micrometastatic cells in a state of dormancy and those that promote survival, proliferation and progression of such cells. Significantly more information is available on the latter factors than on microenvironmental cells and molecules that restrain micrometastasis. This mini-review summarizes findings suggesting that: •The interactions between the metastatic microenvironment and cancer cells metastasizing to this microenvironment are unique to each metastatic microenvironment.•cells or molecules in the metastatic microenvironment could act as "double agents" exerting pro- or anti-malignant functions.•In the early phases of tumor progression, the interactions between cancer cells and the metastatic microenvironment are inhibitory whereas in later stages such interactions promote progression towards metastasis. In view of the above, it is not unlikely that metastases residing in different microenvironments may require “individualized” treatment modalities.
    Cancer letters 08/2013; 352(1). DOI:10.1016/j.canlet.2013.08.029 · 5.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many advanced tumors produce excessive amounts of Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β) which, in normal epithelial cells, is a potent growth inhibitor. However, in oncogenically activated cells, the homeostatic action of TGF-β is often diverted along alternative pathways. Hence, TGF-β signaling elicits protective or tumor suppressive effects during the early growth-sensitive stages of tumorigenesis. However, later in tumor development when carcinoma cells become refractory to TGF-β-mediated growth inhibition, the tumor cell responds by stimulating pathways with tumor progressing effects. At late stages of malignancy, tumor progression is driven by TGF-β overload. The tumor microenvironment is a target of TGF-β action that stimulates tumor progression via pro-tumorigenic effects on vascular, immune, and fibroblastic cells. Bone is one of the richest sources of TGF-β in the body and a common site for dissemination of breast cancer metastases. Osteoclastic degradation of bone matrix, which accompanies establishment and growth of metastases, triggers further release of bone-derived TGF-β. This leads to a vicious positive feedback of tumor progression, driven by ever increasing levels of TGF-β released from both the tumor and bone matrix. It is for this reason, that pharmaceutical companies have developed therapeutic agents that block TGF-β signaling. Nonetheless, the choice of drug design and dosing strategy can affect the efficacy of TGF-β therapeutics. This review will describe pre-clinical and clinical data of four major classes of TGF-β inhibitor, namely i) ligand traps, ii) antisense oligonucleotides, iii) receptor kinase inhibitors and iv) peptide aptamers. Long term dosing strategies with TGF-β inhibitors may be ill-advised, since this class of drug has potentially highly pleiotropic activity, and development of drug resistance might potentiate tumor progression. Current paradigms for the use of TGF-β inhibitors in oncology have therefore moved towards the use of combinatorial therapies and short term dosing, with considerable promise for the clinic.
    International journal of biological sciences 07/2012; 8(7):964-78. DOI:10.7150/ijbs.4564 · 4.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is essential for the metastasis of tumor cells and maintaining their stemness. This study aimed to examine whether endothelial cells, which are most closely located to tumor cells in vivo, play a role in inducing EMT in tumor cells or not. METHODS: Concentrated culture medium of bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAEC) was applied to tumor cell lines (A549 and PANC-1) and epithelial cell line (NMuMg). Cadherin conversion, expressions of α-smooth muscle actin and ZO-1, actin fiber formation and cell migration were examined as hallmarks of the induction of EMT in these cell lines. Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) antibodies were used to neutralize TGFβ1, TGFβ2 and TGFβ3. Expression and release of TGFβ proteins in BAEC as well as porcine and human endothelial cells were assessed by Western blotting and ELISA, respectively. RESULTS: Conditioned medium of BAEC induced EMT in the examined cell lines. All endothelial cells from various species and locations expressed TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 proteins and much lower level of TGFβ3 protein. Conditioned medium from these endothelial cells contained TGFβ1 and TGFβ2, but TGFβ3 could not be detected. Neutralizing antibody against each of TGFβ1 or TGFβ2 did not reverse endothelium-dependent EMT, but simultaneous neutralization of both TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 completely abolished it. CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial cells may play a role in the induction and maintenance of EMT in tumor cells by constitutively releasing TGFβ1 and TGFβ2. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: The present results provide a novel strategy of the inhibition of tumor metastasis by targeting vascular endothelium.
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 05/2013; 1830(10). DOI:10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.05.009 · 4.66 Impact Factor