Incident cognitive impairment is elevated in the stroke belt: The REGARDS Study

Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-2041, USA.
Annals of Neurology (Impact Factor: 9.98). 08/2011; 70(2):229-36. DOI: 10.1002/ana.22432
Source: PubMed


To determine whether incidence of impaired cognitive screening status is higher in the southern Stroke Belt region of the United States than in the remaining United States.
A national cohort of adults age ≥45 years was recruited by the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study from 2003 to 2007. Participants' global cognitive status was assessed annually by telephone with the Six-Item Screener (SIS) and every 2 years with fluency and recall tasks. Participants who reported no stroke history and who were cognitively intact at enrollment (SIS >4 of 6) were included (N = 23,913, including 56% women; 38% African Americans and 62% European Americans; 56% Stroke Belt residents and 44% from the remaining contiguous United States and the District of Columbia). Regional differences in incident cognitive impairment (SIS score ≤4) were adjusted for age, sex, race, education, and time between first and last assessments.
A total of 1,937 participants (8.1%) declined to an SIS score ≤4 at their most recent assessment, over a mean of 4.1 (±1.6) years. Residents of the Stroke Belt had greater adjusted odds of incident cognitive impairment than non-Belt residents (odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.30). All demographic factors and time independently predicted impairment.
Regional disparities in cognitive decline mirror regional disparities in stroke mortality, suggesting shared risk factors for these adverse outcomes. Efforts to promote cerebrovascular and cognitive health should be directed to the Stroke Belt.

31 Reads
  • Source
    • "Differences in performance between European Americans and African Americans have generally been considered to reflect nonequivalence of similarly labeled years of education (Manly, Jacobs, Touradji, Small, & Stern, 2002). Other factors, such as geographic region may also be involved, since there is evidence that older community residents in the south may perform more poorly than those living elsewhere (Fillenbaum, Unverzagt, Ganguli, Welsh-Bohmer, & Heyman, 2002; Wadley, Unverzagt, McGuire, et al., 2011). Why the performance of Cache County European Americans was better than that of the CERAD clinic volunteers is unclear. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recall of the four-item constructional praxis measure was a later addition to the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) neuropsychological battery. Norms for this measure, based on cognitively intact African Americans age ≥70 (Indianapolis-Ibadan Dementia Project, N=372), European American participants age ≥66 (Cache County Study of Memory, Health and Aging, N=507), and European American CERAD clinic controls age ≥50 (N = 182), are presented here. Performance varied by site; by sex, education, and age (African Americans in Indianapolis); education and age (Cache County European Americans); and only age (CERAD European American controls). Performance declined with increased age, within age with less education, and was poorer for women. Means, standard deviations, and percentiles are presented separately for each sample.
    The Clinical Neuropsychologist 11/2011; 25(8):1345-58. DOI:10.1080/13854046.2011.614962 · 1.72 Impact Factor

  • Annals of Neurology 10/2011; 70(4):666; author reply 666-7. DOI:10.1002/ana.22618 · 9.98 Impact Factor
  • Article: Reply.

    Annals of Neurology 10/2011; 70(4):666-7. DOI:10.1002/ana.22617 · 9.98 Impact Factor
Show more

Full-text (3 Sources)

31 Reads
Available from
May 17, 2014