Article

Do older athletes reach limits in their performance during marathon running?

INSERM U, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.
Age (Impact Factor: 3.45). 05/2011; 34(3):773-81. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-011-9271-z
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In the last decades, the participation of elderly trained people in endurance events such as marathon running has dramatically increased. Previous studies suggested that the performance of master runners (>40 years) during marathon running has improved. The aims of the study were (1) to analyze the changes in participation and performance trends of master marathon runners between 1980 and 2009, and (2) to compare the gender differences in performance as a function of age across the years. Running times of the best male and female runners between 20 and 79 years of age who competed in the New York City Marathon were analyzed. Gender differences in performance times were analyzed for the top 10 male and female runners between 20 and 65 years of age. The participation of master runners increased during the 1980-2009 period, to a greater extent for females compared to males. During that period, running times of master runners significantly (P < 0.01) decreased for males older than 64 years and for females older than 44 years, respectively. Gender differences in running times decreased over the last three decades but remained relatively stable across the ages during the last decade. These data suggest that male (≥65 years) and female (≥45 years) master runners have probably not yet reached their limits in marathon performance. The relative stability of gender differences in marathon running times across the different age groups over the last decade also suggests that age-related declines in physiological function do not differ between male and female marathoners.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Romuald Lepers, Oct 02, 2014
2 Followers
 · 
138 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to examine the participation and performance trends in wheelchair marathon for wheelchair (WC) and hand cycle (HC) athletes. Age and time performance data for all athletes in the WC and HC categories who completed the " New York City Marathon " from 1999 to 2010 were analyzed. During this period, there were 698 total finishers (132 women and 566 men) for WC athletes and 776 total finishers (141 women and 635 men) for HC athletes. Women accounted for ∼20% of the total field for both categories. For both men and women, the age of the winner and the mean age of all finishers were significantly (P < 0.01) younger for WC compared with HC athletes. For men, the race times were significantly (P < 0.01) shorter for the HC winner and overall finishers compared with WC counterpart. Since 2003, the sex difference in time performances for WC athletes stabilized at ∼25%, while the sex difference for HC athletes was more variable (15–45%). Future studies need to investigate the reasons why HC marathoners are older than WC marathoners and why the sex differences in marathon performance are much greater for disabled athletes than for able-bodied athletes. Résumé. Analyse des performances sur marathon desathì etes handisports. Le but de cetté etudé etait d'analyser la participation et les performances sur marathon desathì etes handisports en fauteuils roulants classiques (WC) et en fauteuils avec pédalage des bras ou Handbike (HC). L'ˆ age et les performances chronométriques de tous lesathì etes ayant participé au marathon de New-York, dans les catégories WC et HC, ont eté analysés entre 1999 et 2010. Durant cette période , un total de 698athì etes WC (132 femmes et 566 hommes) et 776athì etes HC (141 femmes et 635 hommes) ont terminé la course. Les femmes représentaient ∼20 % du total des arrivants dans les deux catégories. Lesathì etes en catégorie WC etait significativement (P < 0,01) plus jeunes en comparaison desathì etes HC, aussi bien chez les femmes que chez les hommes. Chez les hommes, les performances chronométriques etaient meilleures (P < 0,01) pour lesathì etes HC que pour lesathì etes WC. Depuis 2003, la différence de performance entre les hommes et les femmes s'est stabilisée aux alentours de 25 % pour lesathì etes WC, alors qu'ellé etait plus variables (15–45 %) pour lesathì etes HC. Des etudes ultérieures devront expliquer pourquoi sur marathon lesathì etes HC sont plus agés que lesathì etes WC, et pourquoi la différence de performance au marathon entre les hommes et les femmes est plus grande dans les catégories handisports que pour lesathì etes valides. Mots clés : Endurance, différence des genres,athì ete handisport, fauteuils roulants sportifs
    01/2013; DOI:10.1051/sm/2013078
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aims of this study were (1) to investigate the participation and performance trends at the '100 km Lauf Biel' in Switzerland from 1998 to 2010, and (2) to compare the age-related changes in 100-km running performance between males and females. For both sexes, the percent of finishers significantly (P < 0.01) decreased for the 18-29 and the 30-39-year age groups, while it significantly (P < 0.01) increased for the 40-49 and the 50-59-year age groups over the studied period. From 1998 to 2010, the mean age of the top ten finishers increased by 0.4 years per annum for both females (P = 0.02) and males (P = 0.003). The running time for the top ten finishers remained stable for females, while it significantly (P = 0.001) increased by 2.4 min per annum for males. There was a significant (P < 0.001) age effect on running times for both sexes. The best 100-km running times was observed for the age comprised between 30 and 49 years for males, and between 30 and 54 years for females, respectively. The age-related decline in running performance was similar until 60-64 years between males and females, but was greater for females compared to males after 65 years. Future studies should investigate the lifespan from 65 to 75 years to better understand the performance difference between male and female master ultra-marathoners.
    Age 07/2011; 34(4):1033-45. DOI:10.1007/s11357-011-9290-9 · 3.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The purpose of this study was to define predictor variables for recreational male Ironman triathletes, using age and basic measurements of anthropometry, training, and previous performance to establish an equation for the prediction of an Ironman race time for future recreational male Ironman triathletes. Methods: Age and anthropometry, training, and previous experience variables were related to Ironman race time using bivariate and multivariate analysis. Results: A total of 184 recreational male triathletes, of mean age 40.9 ± 8.4 years, height 1.80 ± 0.06 m, and weight 76.3 ± 8.4 kg completed the Ironman within 691 ± 83 minutes. They spent 13.9 ± 5.0 hours per week in training, covering 6.3 ± 3.1 km of swimming, 194.4 ± 76.6 km of cycling, and 45.0 ± 15.9 km of running. In total, 149 triathletes had completed at least one mara-thon, and 150 athletes had finished at least one Olympic distance triathlon. They had a personal best time of 130.4 ± 44.2 minutes in an Olympic distance triathlon and of 193.9 ± 31.9 minutes in marathon running. In total, 126 finishers had completed both an Olympic distance triathlon and a marathon. After multivariate analysis, both a personal best time in a marathon (P , 0.0001) and in an Olympic distance triathlon (P , 0.0001) were the best variables related to Ironman race time. Ironman race time (minutes) might be partially predicted by the following equation: (r 2 = 0.65, standard error of estimate = 56.8) = 152.1 + 1.332 × (personal best time in a marathon, minutes) + 1.964 × (personal best time in an Olympic distance triathlon, minutes). Conclusion: These results suggest that, in contrast with anthropometric and training charac-teristics, both the personal best time in an Olympic distance triathlon and in a marathon predict Ironman race time in recreational male Ironman triathletes.
    Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 08/2011; 2:121-129. DOI:10.2147/OAJSM.S23229