Article

A Structured Diet and Exercise Program Promotes Favorable Changes in Weight Loss, Body Composition, and Weight Maintenance

Exercise and Sport Nutrition Lab, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Journal of the American Dietetic Association (Impact Factor: 3.92). 06/2011; 111(6):828-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.03.013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A number of diet and exercise programs purport to help promote and maintain weight loss. However, few studies have compared the efficacy of different methods.
To determine whether adherence to a meal-replacement-based diet program (MRP) with encouragement to increase physical activity is as effective as following a more structured meal-plan-based diet and supervised exercise program (SDE) in sedentary obese women.
Randomized comparative effectiveness trial.
From July 2007 to October 2008, 90 obese and apparently healthy women completed a 10-week university-based weight loss trial while 77 women from this cohort also completed a 24-week weight maintenance phase.
Participants were matched and randomized to participate in an MRP or SDE program.
Weight loss, health, and fitness-related data were assessed at 0 and 10 weeks on all subjects as well as at 14, 22, and 34 weeks on participants who completed the weight maintenance phase.
Data were analyzed by multivariate analysis of variance for repeated measures.
During the 10-week weight loss phase, moderate and vigorous physical activity levels were significantly higher in the SDE group with no differences observed between groups in daily energy intake. The SDE group lost more weight (-3.1 ± 3.7 vs -1.6 ± 2.5 kg; P = 0.03); fat mass (-2.3 ± 3.5 vs -0.9 ± 1.6 kg; P = 0.02); centimeters from the hips (-4.6 ± 7 vs -0.2 ± 6 cm; P = 0.002) and waist (-2.9 ± 6 vs -0.6 ± 5 cm; P = 0.05); and, experienced a greater increase in peak aerobic capacity than participants in the MRP group. During the 24-week maintenance phase, participants in the SDE group maintained greater moderate and vigorous physical activity levels, weight loss, fat loss, and saw greater improvement in maximal aerobic capacity and strength.
In sedentary and obese women, an SDE-based program appears to be more efficacious in promoting and maintaining weight loss and improvements in markers of health and fitness compared to an MRP type program with encouragement to increase physical activity.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Richard Kreider, Jul 04, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
269 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Als Ursache für die hohe Prävalenz von Übergewicht und Adipositas wird unter anderem die Veränderung der Lebensumstände im Vergleich zu früheren Jahrzehnten, das sogenannte „obesogene“ Umfeld, gesehen. Der Rückgang der körperlichen Aktivität (KA) zugunsten eines sitzenden Lebensstils spielt hierbei vermutlich eine zentrale Rolle. Körperliche Aktivität beziehungsweise Inaktivität beeinflusst sowohl die Entstehung von Übergewicht und Adipositas als auch verschiedene metabolische Störungen. Der vorliegende Übersichtsbeitrag fasst den Stand des Wissens zum Zusammenhang zwischen KA und Übergewicht/Adipositas zusammen. Es werden der Begriff „Körperliche Aktivität“ definiert und verschiedene Methoden ihrer Messung vorgestellt. Außerdem werden Möglichkeiten zur Bewertung/Operationalisierung der ermittelten KA beschrieben, bevor anschließend epidemiologische Studien, die den Zusammenhang zwischen KA und Übergewicht/Adipositas bei Kindern/Jugendlichen und bei Erwachsenen untersucht haben, vorgestellt werden.
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 01/2011; 55(1). DOI:10.1007/s00103-011-1386-y · 1.01 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to determine whether sedentary obese women with knee OA initiating an exercise and weight loss program may experience more beneficial changes in body composition, functional capacity, and/or markers of health following a higher protein diet compared to a higher carbohydrate diet with or without GCM supplementation. Thirty sedentary women (54 ± 9 yrs, 163 ± 6 cm, 88.6 ± 13 kg, 46.1 ± 3% fat, 33.3 ± 5 kg/m2) with clinically diagnosed knee OA participated in a 14-week exercise and weight loss program. Participants followed an isoenergenic low fat higher carbohydrate (HC) or higher protein (HP) diet while participating in a supervised 30-minute circuit resistance-training program three times per week for 14-weeks. In a randomized and double blind manner, participants ingested supplements containing 1,500 mg/d of glucosamine (as d-glucosamine HCL), 1,200 mg/d of chondroitin sulfate (from chondroitin sulfate sodium), and 900 mg/d of methylsulfonylmethane or a placebo. At 0, 10, and 14-weeks, participants completed a battery of assessments. Data were analyzed by MANOVA with repeated measures. Participants in both groups experienced significant reductions in body mass (-2.4 ± 3%), fat mass (-6.0 ± 6%), and body fat (-3.5 ± 4%) with no significant changes in fat free mass or resting energy expenditure. Perception of knee pain (-49 ± 39%) and knee stiffness (-42 ± 37%) was decreased while maximal strength (12%), muscular endurance (20%), balance indices (7% to 20%), lipid levels (-8% to -12%), homeostasis model assessment for estimating insulin resistance (-17%), leptin (-30%), and measures of physical functioning (59%), vitality (120%), and social function (66%) were improved in both groups with no differences among groups. Functional aerobic capacity was increased to a greater degree for those in the HP and GCM groups while there were some trends suggesting that supplementation affected perceptions of knee pain (p < 0.08). Circuit style resistance-training and weight loss improved functional capacity in women with knee OA. The type of diet and dietary supplementation of GCM provided marginal additive benefits. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01271218.
    Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 06/2011; 8(1):8. DOI:10.1186/1550-2783-8-8 · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An estimated 72.5 million American adults are obese, and the growing US obesity epidemic is responsible for substantial increase in morbidity and mortality, as well as increased health care costs. Obesity results from a combination of personal and societal factors, but is often viewed as a character flaw rather than a medical condition. This leads to stigma and discrimination towards obese individuals and decreases the likelihood of effective intervention. Conditions related to obesity are increasingly common, such as metabolic syndrome, impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), all of which indicate high risk for type 2 diabetes (T2DM). This paper reviews the progression from obesity to diabetes, identifying physiological changes that occur along this path as well as opportunities for patient identification and disease prevention. Patients with prediabetes (defined as having IFG, IGT or both) and/or metabolic syndrome require interventions designed to preserve insulin sensitivity and β-cell function, both of which start to deteriorate prior to T2DM diagnosis. Lifestyle modification, including both healthy eating choices and increased physical activity, is essential for weight management and diabetes prevention. Although sustained weight loss is often considered by patients and physicians as being impossible to achieve, effective interventions do exist. Specifically, the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) and programs modelled along its parameters have shown repeated successes, even with long-term maintenance. Recent setbacks in the development of medications for weight loss further stress the importance of lifestyle management. By viewing obesity as a metabolic disorder rather than a personal weakness, we can work with patients to address this increasingly prevalent condition and improve long-term health outcomes.
    Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism 11/2011; 14(5):399-408. DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01536.x · 5.46 Impact Factor