Patients, intimate partners and family experiences of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Qualitative systematic review

Department of Nursing, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Journal of Advanced Nursing (Impact Factor: 1.74). 05/2011; 67(12):2537-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05694.x
Source: PubMed


This paper is a report of an interpretive review of qualitative research on how an implantable cardioverter defibrillator affects adult recipients and their significant others.
An implantable cardioverter defibrillator detects pathological cardiac rhythms and automatically converts the rhythm with electrical counter shocks.
A systematic literature search was conducted for qualitative research papers published between January 1999 and January 2009. PubMed, Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge and CINAHL databases were searched with the following key words: internal defibrillator, implantable defibrillator and qualitative research.
Twenty-two papers were included. The critical appraisal skills programme and prompts were used to appraise studies. Thematic analysis and synthesis approaches were used to interpret evidence.
People with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator were found to experience physical, psychological and social changes. Shocks produce fear and anxiety, affecting relationships and sexual relations. The use of support groups and the use of the Internet are important in helping adjustment to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Women's responses to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator appear different than men's responses and include concerns about physical appearance and relationship issues. Postdischarge follow-up and educational programmes are still underdeveloped.
Patients need additional education, support and follow-up care after hospital discharge. Patients and significant others benefit from collaboration between patient associations and healthcare professional societies. Future research is needed to identify the specific challenges that women recipients face.

Download full-text


Available from: Domingo Palacios-Ceña,
    • "Cutitta et al. (2014) reported that most patients (64.6%) reported the ability to resume sex, but sexual activity was avoided by 51%. Similar to prior reports, lack of sexual interest, erectile dysfunction (ED), partner overprotectiveness, and fear of the device firing during sexual activity contributed to changes in sexual function (Berg et al., 2013; Palacios-Ceña et al., 2011). Heart failure as a chronic condition also impacts sexual function, with sexual problems experienced by approximately 60% of patients, and up to 81% reporting ED specifically (Jaarsma, Fridlund, & Mårtensson, 2014). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to examine change in sexual activity before and after cardiac diagnosis in men and women by medication class. Decline in sexual activity after cardiac diagnosis frequently occurs, with adverse effects of medications believed to play a role, although literature by subclass of drugs are conflicting. Mixed methods approach was used to evaluate cardiac patients' (N=211) self-reported medications and changes in sexual activity before and after cardiac diagnosis via mailed survey. Chi square, logistic regression, and thematic analysis were used. First and third generation beta blockers, class 1 calcium channel blockers, vasodilators, diuretics, and loop diuretics adversely affected sexual activity. Significant predictors of change in sexual activity were number of medications, education level, and income; the overall model predicted 25.7% of the variance in sexual activity. Sexual assessment and discussion of sexual concerns and side effects of medications by nurses are important to support sexual function. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Applied Nursing Research 04/2015; 28(3). DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2015.04.011 · 0.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "A recent review acknowledged the patients' experience of ICDs and shocks (especially inappropriate shocks) is a barrier to informed consent and inhibits decision-making [17] . Patients with ICDs report a number of emotional changes after receiving an ICD with frequent shocks having a negative effect on emotions including an increase in psychological stress and depressive symptoms [27] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This case report aims to outline the psychological effect an arrhythmia can have on a patient and their spouse and how anxiety has a profoundly negative effect on how a patient learns. This case report also highlights the difficulties nurses perceive in attempting to educate and engage the patient and spouse, and the problems in balancing nursing care between technology (in this case the need for constant cardiac monitoring) and more focused on patient concerns (fear of dying and defibrillator discharging). As nursing care incorporates the use of more advanced technology, it is important to ensure care remains patient-focused not technology-focused. The impact of anxiety on cognition and patient learning cannot be underestimated.
    07/2012; DOI:10.5430/jnep.v2n4px
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As faculty members, we frequently find that first-year doctoral students in nursing are confused about how to conduct a systematic integrated literature review. This could be due to its vague definition and a lack of recent literature that provides directions for conducting a systematic integrated literature review. This article aims to provide directions for conducting a systematic integrated literature review by identifying the essential components of published literature reviews in nursing. To achieve this goal, the literature was searched by using the keywords nursing, systematic, and review in multiple databases. A total of 267 articles were selected and are included in this systematic integrated literature review. The articles were then sorted by study design and analyzed in six areas of interests. Finally, a practical guideline for conducting systematic integrated literature reviews is proposed based on the analysis of the literature.
    Journal of Nursing Education 09/2012; 51(11):1-6. DOI:10.3928/01484834-20120914-02 · 0.91 Impact Factor
Show more