Developing and Testing a Clinical Information System Evaluation Tool Prioritizing Modifications Through End-User Input

Patient Care Services Clinical Information Systems, Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri 64108, USA.
The Journal of nursing administration (Impact Factor: 1.37). 06/2011; 41(6):252-8. DOI: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31821c4634
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The objectives were to develop and validate the Information System Evaluation Tool (ISET), use feedback to modify the institution's clinical information system (CIS), and determine the modifications' success.
The ability of a CIS to increase patient safety and care quality is dependent on its systems and processes. A survey was needed to provide the specificity necessary to make meaningful system improvements.
The ISET was pilot tested and revised before being administered before implementation of the CIS. It was administered at 2 times after implementation. The ISET was revised after analysis of the results, and comparisons were made between the times.
The ISET is a valid and reliable instrument. Perceptions of the CIS initially decreased, but had significantly improved by 16 months after implementation.
End-users must be convinced that the CIS supports their practice and improves care for adoption to be successful. The ISET measures these perceptions and highlights areas for improvement.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Health information technology (IT) benefits both patients and providers with respect to health care quality and perceived usefulness. Although existing research provides a preliminary understanding of nurses' perception of health IT, perceptions do not guide actions. This phenomenological study explored nurses' perceptions regarding electronic health records and bar code medication administration four months post implementation on a medical-surgical unit in an academic medical center. Ten staff nurses (8 females and 2 males) participated. We categorized the results into five themes from personal-level to organizational-level confirmed expectations: (1) nurses' interaction with computer, (2) nursing performance regarding task accomplishment, (3) unit-specific teamwork, (4) interdisciplinary teamwork, and (5) quality of care. We discovered that effective health IT must be congruent with nursing expectations. IT professionals, nursing and organizational leaders may use findings to structure an environment supportive of effective health IT in nursing practice.
    International Journal of Medical Informatics 11/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.11.001 · 2.72 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) graduates are expected to contribute to nursing knowledge through empirically based studies and testing the effectiveness of practice approaches that ultimately benefit patients and health care systems. This article describes publication practices of DNP graduates in the scholarly literature. Published studies (2005 to 2012) with at least one author with a DNP degree were identified. The search yielded 300 articles in 59 journals; 175 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. A codebook, consisting of 15 major categories, was used to extract relevant information. Original clinical investigations were the most frequent, followed by practice-focused patient and provider studies. The number of studies published in peer-reviewed journals with DNP-prepared authors increased over time. We recommend greater integration of translational science models into DNP curricula to achieve the goal of publishing scholarly products that use evidence to improve either practice or patient outcomes. [J Nurs Educ. 2013;52(x):xxx-xxx.].
    Journal of Nursing Education 07/2013; 52(8):1-10. DOI:10.3928/01484834-20130718-02 · 0.76 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our aim was to use the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach to prioritize the factors that influence nurses' satisfaction with a hospital information system. First, we reviewed the related literature to identify and select possible factors. Second, we developed an analytic hierarchy process framework with three main factors (quality of services, of systems, and of information) and 22 subfactors. Third, we developed a questionnaire based on pairwise comparisons and invited 10 experienced nurses who were identified through snowball sampling to rate these factors. Finally, we used Chang's fuzzy extent analysis method to compute the weights of these factors and prioritize them. We found that information quality was the most important factor (58%), followed by service quality (22%) and then system quality (19%). In conclusion, although their weights were not similar, all factors were important and should be considered in evaluating nurses' satisfaction.
    Computers, informatics, nursing: CIN 01/2014; 32(4). DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000000031 · 0.81 Impact Factor


Available from
Oct 27, 2014