Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis of the HEART2D Trial Demonstrates Lower Cardiovascular Risk in Older Patients Targeting Postprandial Versus Fasting/Premeal Glycemia

Department of Internal Medicine, Hadassah Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
Diabetes care (Impact Factor: 8.57). 05/2011; 34(7):1511-3. DOI: 10.2337/dc10-2375
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To identify the Hyperglycemia and Its Effect After Acute Myocardial Infarction on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (HEART2D) trial subgroups with treatment difference.
In 1,115 type 2 diabetic patients who had suffered from an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the HEART2D trial compared two insulin strategies targeting postprandial or fasting/premeal glycemia on time until first cardiovascular event (cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome). The HEART2D trial ended prematurely for futility. We used the classification and regression tree (CART) to identify baseline subgroups with potential treatment differences.
CART estimated the age of >65.7 years to best predict the difference in time to first event. In the subgroup aged>65.7 years (prandial, n=189; basal, n=210), prandial patients had a significantly longer time to first event and a lower proportion experienced a first event (n=56 [29.6%] vs. n=85 [40.5%]; hazard ratio 0.69 [95% CI 0.49-0.96]; P=0.029), despite similar A1C levels.
Older type 2 diabetic AMI survivors may have a lower risk for a subsequent cardiovascular event with insulin targeting postprandial versus fasting/premeal glycemia.

Download full-text


Available from: Scott J Jacober, Jul 08, 2015
  • Source
    Diabetes care 10/2011; 34(10):2333-5. DOI:10.2337/dc11-1442 · 8.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Although traditionally used as a final treatment option, early use of insulin is a therapeutic option after metformin failure in type 2 diabetes. Injection of native insulin lacks the rapid onset of action after food ingestion and the chronic maintenance of a steady-state low-level basal insulin in fasting periods. These limitations have fuelled the development of insulin analogues, which mainly fall into two different categories: short-acting and long-acting analogues. AREAS COVERED: We review the recent literature investigating the efficacy and safety of insulin analogues in human diabetes, with emphasis on type 2 diabetes, as about 30% of these patients are being treated with insulin. We also examine novel developments in this area, including the new long-acting basal analogues whose longer duration of action might reduce dosing frequency to three times a week. EXPERT OPINION: Insulin analogues show some advantage compared with native insulin. However, improvements in reducing their pharmacological variability would be expected to lower the risk of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, as well as to simplify and perhaps also encourage optimal insulin titration in real-life clinical practice. Extending the duration of insulin effect would also allow for greater flexibility and potentially reduce the frequency of blood glucose monitoring.
    Expert opinion on biological therapy 01/2012; 12(2):209-21. DOI:10.1517/14712598.2012.648181 · 3.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although insulin products and treatment strategies have improved significantly, clinical challenges still exist. Meeting glycemic goals while minimizing glucose variability and hypoglycemia is of utmost importance when considering existing insulin therapies and designing investigational insulin treatments. A PubMed search identified relevant, peer-reviewed articles related to the evolution of insulin development for this nonsystematic review. Search terms included "animal insulin," "synthetic insulin," "regular human insulin," "insulin lispro," "insulin aspart," "insulin glulisine," "insulin glargine," "insulin detemir," "insulin degludec," "biphasic human insulin," "insulin premixes," "ultra-long acting," "oral insulin," and "inhaled insulin." While the discovery of animal insulin significantly decreased mortality rates from diabetes, issues with availability and large variability between batches led to difficulty in determining proper doses and, subsequently, challenges in achieving glycemic control and avoiding hypoglycemia. The development of synthetic insulin created a more readily available supply, but hypoglycemia still persisted. Recombinant DNA technology solved insulin production problems and allowed for the development of better retarding agents, but pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles still did not mimic natural insulin. Insulin premixes offered improved glycemic control, decreased intrapatient variability versus self-mixing, and required fewer injections per day; however, patient adherence remained a problem due to the need to inject 30-60 minutes before a meal for optimal control. This prompted the development of rapid-acting insulin analogs that could be injected right before a meal and long-acting insulin analogs with flatter time-action profiles. Despite advances in insulin development, a need to provide more physiologic basal insulin coverage and reduce hypoglycemic risk in patients with diabetes remains. Newer insulin analogs and more convenient routes of insulin delivery have shown promising safety and efficacy results. Many patients with diabetes have not reached glycemic goals on currently available insulins. Additional studies are necessary to tailor optimal insulin delivery strategies to specific subsets of diabetes patients.
    Advances in Therapy 07/2012; 29(7):590-619. DOI:10.1007/s12325-012-0034-8 · 2.44 Impact Factor