Article
Thermal thresholds for teratogenicity, reproduction, and development.
Center for Biomedical Physics, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, USA.
International Journal of Hyperthermia (impact factor:
1.92).
01/2011;
27(4):374-87.
DOI:10.3109/02656736.2011.553769
pp.374-87
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: CEM43°C thermal dose thresholds: a potential guide for magnetic resonance radiofrequency exposure levels?
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To define thresholds of safe local temperature increases for MR equipment that exposes patients to radiofrequency fields of high intensities for long duration. These MR systems induce heterogeneous energy absorption patterns inside the body and can create localised hotspots with a risk of overheating. METHODS: The MRI + EUREKA research consortium organised a "Thermal Workshop on RF Hotspots". The available literature on thresholds for thermal damage and the validity of the thermal dose (TD) model were discussed. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The following global TD threshold guidelines for safe use of MR are proposed: 1. All persons: maximum local temperature of any tissue limited to 39 °C 2. Persons with compromised thermoregulation AND (a) Uncontrolled conditions: maximum local temperature limited to 39 °C (b) Controlled conditions: TD < 2 CEM43°C 3. Persons with uncompromised thermoregulation AND (a) Uncontrolled conditions: TD < 2 CEM43°C (b) Controlled conditions: TD < 9 CEM43°C The following definitions are applied: Controlled conditions A medical doctor or a dedicated trained person can respond instantly to heat-induced physiological stress Compromised thermoregulation All persons with impaired systemic or reduced local thermoregulation KEY POINTS : • Standard MRI can cause local heating by radiofrequency absorption. • Monitoring thermal dose (in units of CEM43°C) can control risk during MRI. • 9 CEM43°C seems an acceptable thermal dose threshold for most patients. • For skin, muscle, fat and bone,16 CEM43°C is likely acceptable.European Radiology 04/2013; · 3.22 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
1-g volume
blood volume
cell differentiation
cell proliferation
convective exchange
entire 28-day embryo
Foetal exposures
foetal temperature
healthy adult female
heat dissipation
heat exchange
higher power Doppler ultrasound devices
human embryo
limited ability
lower values
maternal core body temperature increases
maximum spatial peak temporal average intensity
measurable temperature increases
temperature elevations
whole body average