First experiences with negative pressure wound therapy and instillation in the treatment of infected orthopaedic implants: a clinical observational study.

Department of Orthopedic Oncology and Septic Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
International Orthopaedics (Impact Factor: 2.32). 05/2011; 35(9):1415-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1274-y
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Infections associated with orthopaedic implants remain a serious complication. The main objective in acute infection control is component retention, whereas this option is usually not considered for chronic infections.
This multi-centre prospective, non-randomised observational study investigated one possible treatment option for implant retention in combination with negative pressure wound therapy with instillation (NPWTi). Thirty-two patients with an infected orthopaedic implant were analysed. Twenty-two patients had an acute infection (< 8 weeks after implantation) and ten patients had a chronic infection (> 8 weeks and < 36 weeks after implant placement). Polyhexanide was used as the instillation solution in 31 of the 32 cases.
Nineteen patients (86.4%) with an acute infection and eight patients (80%) with a chronic infection retained their implant at 4-6 months follow-up after treatment.
Our study showed that NPWTi can be used as adjunctive therapy for salvage of acutely infected orthopaedic implants and may even be considered for early chronically infected implants.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the current literature about how successfully periprosthetic hip joint infections can be managed by debridement and prosthesis retention. A literature search was performed through PubMed until September 2013. Search terms were "DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and retention)" alone and in combination with "hip" as well as "hip infection + prosthesis retention". A total of 11 studies reporting on 292 cases could be identified. Five different treatment modalities have been described with varying success rates (debridement-21% infection eradication rate; debridement + lavage-75% infection eradication rate; debridement, lavage, with change of modular prosthesis components-70.4% infection eradication rate; debridement, lavage, change of modular prosthesis components + vacuum-assisted closure-92.8% infection eradication rate; acetabular cup removal + spacer head onto retained stem-89.6% infection eradication rate). With regard to the postoperative antibiotic therapy, no general consensus could be drawn from the available data. Debridement, antibiotic therapy, irrigation, and prosthesis retention is an acceptable solution in the management of early and acute hematogenous periprosthetic hip joint infections. The current literature does not allow for generalization of conclusions with regard to the best treatment modality. A large, multi-center study is required for identification of the optimal treatment of these infections.
    World journal of orthopedics. 07/2014; 5(3):218-24.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) in wound healing after femoral neck fracture (FNF) treated with hip hemiarthroplasty (HA) and its influence on postoperative seromas, wound secretion, as well as time and material consumption for dressing changes. The study is a prospective randomised evaluation of iNPWT in patients with large surgical wounds after FNF. Patients were randomised either to be treated by iNPWT (group A) or a standard wound dressing (group B). Follow-up included ultrasound measurements of seroma volumes on postoperative days 5 and 10, duration of wound secretion, and time and material spent for wound dressing changes. For comparison of the means, we used the t-test for independent samples, P > 0·05 was considered significant. There were 21 patients randomised in this study. Group A (11 patients, 81·6 ± 5·2 years of age) developed a seroma of 0·257 ± 0·75 cm3 after 5 days and had a secretion of 0·9 ± 1·0 days, and the total time for dressing changes was 14·8 ± 3·9 minutes, whereas group B (ten patients, 82·6 ± 8·6 years of age) developed a seroma of 3·995 ± 5·01 cm3 after 5 days and had a secretion of 4·3 ± 2·45 days, and the total time for dressing changes was 42·9 ± 11·0 minutes. All mentioned differences were significant. iNPWT has been used on many different types of traumatic and non-traumatic wounds. This prospective, randomised study has demonstrated decreased development of postoperative seromas, reduction of total wound secretion days and reduction of needed time for dressing changes.
    International Wound Journal 08/2014; · 1.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Journal of wound care. 10/2012; 21(Sup10):S11-S15.


1 Download
Available from