Feasibility of magnetic bead technology for concentration of mycobacteria in sputum prior to fluorescence microscopy

FIND, Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Kampala, Uganda.
BMC Infectious Diseases (Impact Factor: 2.61). 05/2011; 11(1):125. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-125
Source: PubMed


Direct sputum smear microscopy is the mainstay of TB diagnosis in most low and middle income countries, and is highly specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in such settings. However it is limited by low sensitivity, particularly in HIV co-infected patients. Concentration by centrifugation has been reported to be more sensitive than direct smear preparation, but is only suitable for referral laboratories. Simpler concentration methods that could be applied in peripheral laboratories are urgently needed.
We evaluated the feasibility of an early prototype ligand-coated magnetic bead technology to concentrate M. tuberculosis prior to detection by LED-based fluorescence microscopy compared with direct Ziehl-Neelsen microscopy and direct and concentrated fluorescence microscopy in a reference laboratory in Kampala, Uganda. Results were compared with MGIT 960 liquid culture and Lowenstein-Jensen culture.
Compared to culture, concentrated FM had significantly higher sensitivity than direct ZN (74.8% and 51.4%), magnetic bead-FM (65.4%) and direct FM (58.9%). The sensitivity of magnetic bead FM was significantly higher than direct ZN (p<0.001) but not significantly higher than direct FM (p=0.210). The specificity of magnetic bead FM and concentrated FM was significantly lower than direct ZN (88.6%, 94.3% and 98.9% respectively) and direct FM (99.4%). There was no significant difference in specificity between magnetic bead FM and concentrated FM. Allowing for blinded resolution of discrepant results, the specificity of magnetic bead FM increased to 93.1%. Direct microscopy was simpler than concentrated FM and Magnetic bead FM which both had a similar number of steps.
The sensitivity of the early prototype magnetic bead FM was lower than concentrated FM, similar to direct FM, and significantly higher than direct ZN. Both magnetic bead and concentration by centrifugation led to reduced specificity compared with the direct smear methods. Some magnetic bead FM false positive results were not easily explained and should be further investigated. The prototype version of the magnetic bead procedure tested here was of similar complexity to concentration by centrifugation. As such, if the sensitivity of the magnetic bead FM could be improved in future versions of the technology, this may offer a viable alternative to centrifugation.

Download full-text


Available from: Heidi Albert, Sep 17, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diagnosis represents only one aspect of tuberculosis (TB) control but is perhaps one of the most challenging. The drawbacks of current tools highlight several unmet needs in TB diagnosis i.e. necessity for accuracy, rapidity of diagnosis, affordability, simplicity, and the ability to generate same-day results at point-of-care (POC). When a return visit is required to access test results, time to treatment is prolonged and default rates are significant. However, a good diagnostic tool is also critically dependent on obtaining an adequate biological sample. Here we review the accuracy and potential impact of established and newer potential POC diagnostic tests for TB including smear microscopy, the Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Cepheid) and the Determine TB LAM antigen test (Alere). Novel experimental approaches and detection technologies for POC diagnosis of active TB, including nucleic acid amplification tests, detection of volatile organic compounds or metabolites, mass spectroscopy, microfluidics, SERS, electrochemical approaches, and aptamers amongst others, are discussed. We also discuss future applications, including the potential POC diagnosis of drug-resistant TB and presumed latent TB infection. Challenges to the development and roll-out of POC tests for TB are also reviewed.
    Respirology 11/2012; 18(2). DOI:10.1111/resp.12022 · 3.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A magnetic-bead protocol and standard centrifugation protocol yielded Mycobacterium tuberculosis in 40/50 sputum specimens in respectively 12±1 days and 11±2 days (p>0.05, Student test). Manipulation took respectively 35 ± 5 min and 45 ± 10 min (p<0.05). Magnetic-bead protocol could advantageously replace centrifugation for culturing M. tuberculosis from sputum.
    Journal of clinical microbiology 02/2013; 51(5). DOI:10.1128/JCM.03428-12 · 3.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Concentration of mycobacteria from sputum by centrifugation prior to acid-fast microscopy increases case finding compared to direct microscopy of the sputum (direct smear). However, centrifugation has to be performed outside the safety cabinet and many laboratories do not have access to a centrifuge. Magnetic bead extraction of the mycobacteria is an alternative method that can be performed in cabinet with just a magnet. Magnetic TB-Bead (Microsens Medtech Ltd) extraction of mycobacteria from sputum prior to microscopy was compared to direct smear on 78 sputum samples. Microscopy of the TB-Bead extracts identified all of 26 of the direct smear positive samples either with the same microscopy score or, in 19/27 of samples, with an increased microscopy score which aided microscopy detection. In addition, microscopy of the TB-Bead extracts identified 10 additional positive samples compared to direct smear; which represents a statistically significant increase in case finding of 38% (p=0.002) compared to direct smear. In a separate study, TB-Beads enabled a further 4 positive samples to be detected from 30 centrifuged pellets that were originally smear negative; two of these were subsequently found to be positive when the original deposits were reinvestigated by smear microscopy. By concentrating mycobacteria from sputum and sputum deposits, TB-Beads has been demonstrated to increase the number of positive sputum samples which could increase case-finding. The TB-Bead method is simple and rapid and compatible with use within a safety cabinet.
    Journal of microbiological methods 03/2013; 93(2). DOI:10.1016/j.mimet.2013.02.010 · 2.03 Impact Factor
Show more