Commentary: Teachers: Researchers: Altruistic: Self-centered?

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA. .
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education (Impact Factor: 0.7). 11/2010; 38(6):408-9. DOI: 10.1002/bmb.20455
Source: PubMed
  • Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 11/2006; 34(6):447-8. · 0.70 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 11/2006; 31(6):422 - 423. · 0.70 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Academicians have been arguing for decades about whether or not faculty research supports undergraduate instruction. Those who say it does—a group that includes most administrators and faculty members—cite many ways in which research can enrich teaching, while those on the other side cite numerous studies that have consistently failed to show a measurable linkage between the two activities. This article proposes that the two sides are debating different propositions: whether research can support teaching in principle and whether it has been shown to do so in practice. The article reviews the literature on the current state of the research-teaching nexus and then examines three specific strategies for integrating teaching and scholarship: bringing research into the classroom, involving undergraduates in research projects, and broadening the definition of scholarship beyond frontier discipli-nary research. Finally, ways are suggested to better realize the potential synergies between faculty research and undergraduate education.
    Journal of Engineering Education. 01/2007; 96:283-294.