Article

Reproducibility of straylight measurement by C-Quant for assessment of retinal straylight using the compensation comparison method.

Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, University of Lausanne, Avenue de France 15, 1000 Lausanne 7, Vaud, Switzerland.
Albrecht von Graæes Archiv für Ophthalmologie (Impact Factor: 1.93). 05/2011; 249(9):1367-71. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-011-1704-y
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Straylight gives the appearance of a veil of light thrown over a person's retinal image when there is a strong light source present. We examined the reproducibility of the measurements by C-Quant, and assessed its correlation to characteristics of the eye and subjects' age.
Five repeated straylight measurements were taken using the dominant eye of 45 healthy subjects (age 21-59) with a BCVA of 20/20: 14 emmetropic, 16 myopic, eight hyperopic and seven with astigmatism. We assessed the extent of reproducibility of straylight measures using the intraclass correlation coefficient.
The mean straylight value of all measurements was 1.01 (SD 0.23, median 0.97, interquartile range 0.85-1.1). Per 10 years of age, straylight increased in average by 0.10 (95%CI 0.04 to 0.16, p < 0.01]. We found no independent association of refraction (range -5.25 dpt to +2 dpt) on straylight values (0.001; 95%CI -0.022 to 0.024, p = 0.92). Compared to emmetropic subjects, myopia reduced straylight (-.011; -0.024 to 0.02, p = 0.11), whereas higher straylight values (0.09; -0.01 to 0.20, p = 0.09) were observed in subjects with blue irises as compared to dark-colored irises when correcting for age. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of repeated measurements was 0.83 (95%CI 0.76 to 0.90).
Our study showed that straylight measurements with the C-Quant had a high reproducibility, i.e. a lack of large intra-observer variability, making it appropriate to be applied in long-term follow-up studies assessing the long-term effect of surgical procedures on the quality of vision.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
105 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The earliest studies on 'disability glare' date from the early 20(th) century. The condition was defined as the negative effect on visual function of a bright light located at some distance in the visual field. It was found that for larger angles (>1degree) the functional effect corresponded precisely to the effect of a light with a luminosity equal to that of the light that is perceived spreading around such a bright source. This perceived spreading of light was called straylight and by international standard disability glare was defined as identical to straylight. The phenomenon was recognized in the ophthalmological community as an important aspect of the quality of vision and attempts were made to design instruments to measure it. This must not be confused with instruments that assess light spreading over small distances (<1 degree), as originating from (higher order) aberrations and defocus. In recent years a new instrument has gained acceptance (C-Quant) for objective and controllable assessment of straylight in the clinical setting. This overview provides a sketch of the historical development of straylight measurement, as well as the results of studies on the origins of straylight (or disability glare) in the normal eye, and on findings on cataract (surgery) and corneal conditions.
    Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik 11/2012; · 1.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To evaluate visual recovery and intraocular straylight in keratoconus patients 3 months and 1 year after corneal crosslinking (CXL) PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three eyes of 28 consecutive patients with mild to moderate keratoconus were included. The following were assessed at baseline, 3 months and 1 year after CXL: corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular straylight, spherical equivalent (SE), keratometry (Kmax and K min (Diopters D and axis), the regularity index and pachymetry. Changes from baseline were calculated using mixed linear regression models. RESULTS: The CDVA remained unchanged 3 months after CXL (-0.003 (95 % CI: -0.038 to 0.044); p = 0.880) and improved after 1 year (-0.042 (95 % CI: -0.078 to -0.007; p = 0.021)). The mean straylight value increased significantly by 0.27 (95 % CI: 0.18 to 0.35; p < 0.001) 3 months after CX and normalized to preoperative values after 1 year (0.06 (95 % CI: -0.03 to 0.14; p = 0.215)). SE improved from the mean preoperative value of -2.61 D (95 % CI: -3.83 to -1.39) by 1.95 (95 % CI: 1.03 to 2.86; p < 0.001) at 3 months and remained stable at the 1-year follow-up visit (2.17 (95 % CI: 1.21 to 3.12; p < 0.001)). Parameters of of keratometry changed only minimally. The regularity index remained almost unchanged at 3 months (2.45 (95 % CI: -4.97 to 9.88; p = 0.503)) and decreased by 6.97 (95 % CI: -14.08 to 0.14; p = 0.054). Pachymetry decreased by 44.0 μm (95 % CI: 56.1 to 31.9; p < 0.001) at 3 months and almost returned to preoperative values at 12 months (-11.3 μm (95 % CI: -27.9 to 5.3; p = 0.175)). CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with the decrease in CDVA and patients' complaints of disability due to glare, intraocular straylight increased 3 months after surgery. One year after CXL, there was an increase in CDVA due to an improved SE and regularity index, and intraocular straylight had normalized.
    Albrecht von Graæes Archiv für Ophthalmologie 08/2012; · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Etwa 50–60% aller Patienten mit chronischem Offenwinkelglaukom leiden auch an einem trockenen Auge mit einer Oberflächenstörung und haben eine verminderte Hornhautdicke. Bei bildgebenden Verfahren kommt es durch Symptome des trockenen Auges zu einer Abminderung und Verrauschung der gemessenen Signale, bei Perimetrieverfahren zu einer diffusen Empfindlichkeitsminderung. Mögliche Einflussfaktoren auf neue Perimetrieverfahren wie Frequenzverdopplungsperimetrie (FDT), Flicker-Defined-Form (FDF)-Perimetrie und Pulsarperimetrie (PP) entstehen beim trockenen Auge möglicherweise durch Streulicht und vermindertes Kontrastsehen. Bei Glaukompatienten mit Oberflächenstörungen sollten deshalb insbesondere Verfahren mit hoher Sensitivität und geringerer Spezifität bei Verlaufskontrollen einer kritischen Plausibilitätskontrolle durch den Untersucher unterzogen werden. Bei unkritischer Anwendung der genannten Verfahren besteht die Gefahr einer Überinterpretation im Sinne einer nicht vorhandenen Glaukomprogredienz. Gegebenenfalls ist eine Vorbehandlung mit Tränenersatzmitteln oder eine Umstellung auf unkonservierte topische Antiglaukomatosa sinnvoll. Danach sollten erneute Kontrollmessungen erfolgen, um ein pseudoprogredientes Glaukom auszuschließen.
    Der Ophthalmologe 109(11). · 0.53 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
13 Downloads
Available from
Jun 26, 2014