Effects of a low-fat dietary intervention on glucose, insulin, and insulin resistance in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Dietary Modification trial.

Division of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Impact Factor: 6.5). 07/2011; 94(1):75-85. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.110.010843
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Glycemic effects of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) low-fat dietary intervention are unknown.
Our objective was to analyze the effects of the WHI low-fat dietary intervention on serum glucose and insulin and insulin resistance up to 6 y after random assignment.
Postmenopausal WHI Dietary Modification trial intervention (DM-I) and comparison (DM-C) participants with blood measures at least at baseline and year 1 (n = 2263) were included. Anthropometric measures, dietary assessments, serum glucose and insulin concentrations, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) measures, and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) values were obtained at baseline, year 1, year 3, and year 6. Changes in measures were compared between groups at years 1, 3, and 6 overall and within stratified analyses.
Mean (±SD) differences in changes at year 1 between the DM-I and DM-C groups were as follows: glucose, -1.7 ± 17.9 mg/dL; insulin, -0.7 ± 5.1 μIU/mL; HOMA-IR, -0.2 ± 1.9; and QUICKI, 0.004 ± 0.019 (all P < 0.05). Similar findings resulted from repeated-measures analyses comparing the intervention and comparison groups over the 6 y. Whereas normoglycemic women at baseline had a decrease in glucose at year 1 that was 1.9 ± 17.2 mg/dL greater in the DM-I than in the DM-C group, diabetic women had an increase in glucose that was 7.9 ± 20.3 mg/dL greater in the DM-I than in the DM-C group (P for interaction <0.001).
A low-fat diet was not significantly associated with adverse glycemic effects up to 6 y after random assignment in postmenopausal women. However, diabetic women experienced adverse glycemic effects of the low-fat diet. This trial is registered at as NCT00000611.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the long-term effects ( ≥ 12 months) of high-fat (HF) v. low-fat (LF) diet consumption on the indicators of glycaemic control as well as cardiovascular risk factors in pre-diabetic and diabetic individuals. Literature search was carried out using the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Trial Register until November 2013. Study-specific weighted mean differences (MD) were pooled using a random-effects model of the Cochrane software package Review Manager 5.1 and Stata 12.0 was used for meta-regressions. A total of fourteen trials met the inclusion criteria and a maximum of 1753 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. HF regimens were found to result in a significant decrease in TAG levels (MD - 0·19 mmol/l, 95 % CI - 0·23, - 0·14, P< 0·001; I 2= 0 %, P= 0·58) and diastolic blood pressure (MD - 1·30 mmHg, 95 % CI - 1·73, - 0·87, P< 0·001; I 2= 0 %, P= 0·60) and a significant increase in HDL-cholesterol levels (MD 0·05 mmol/l, 95 % CI 0·01, 0·08, P= 0·01; I 2= 57 %, P= 0·01). In addition, MD in the reductions of fasting glucose levels ( - 0·41 mmol/l, 95 % CI - 0·74, - 0·08, P= 0·01; I 2 = 56 %, P= 0·02) were significantly high in patients with type 2 diabetes adhering to a HF diet. HF and LF diets might not be of equal value in the management of either pre-diabetes or type 2 diabetes, leading to emphasis being placed on the recommendations of HF diets.
    The British journal of nutrition 03/2014; · 3.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE Impaired insulin sensitivity increases the risk of cardiovascular disease. Although calorie restriction and weight loss increase insulin sensitivity, the effects of modifying macronutrient composition on insulin sensitivity are uncertain. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects on insulin sensitivity of a carbohydrate-rich diet (CARB; similar to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension [DASH] diet), a protein-rich diet (PROT; protein predominantly from plant sources), and an unsaturated fat-rich diet (UNSAT; predominantly monounsaturated).RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This study was a randomized, controlled, three-period, crossover feeding study. The study participants were 164 individuals with pre- or stage 1 hypertension without diabetes. Diets were administered for 6 weeks each, with a washout period between diets of 2-4 weeks. Weight was held constant throughout the study. For our primary outcome, we calculated the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) using the end-of-period fasting serum glucose and insulin. QUICKI is a validated measure of insulin sensitivity. The primary analyses used generalized estimating equations.RESULTSAt baseline, mean (SD) BMI was 30.2 (6.1) kg/m(2), and mean (SD) QUICKI was 0.35 (0.04). The UNSAT diet increased QUICKI by 0.005, more than the CARB diet (P = 0.04). PROT had no significant effect compared with CARB.CONCLUSIONSA diet that partially replaces carbohydrate with unsaturated fat may improve insulin sensitivity in a population at risk for cardiovascular disease. Given the well-recognized challenges of sustaining weight loss, our results suggest an alternative approach for improving insulin sensitivity.
    Diabetes care 12/2012; · 7.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Some popular weight loss diets restricting carbohydrates (CHO) claim to be more effective, and have additional health benefits in preventing cardiovascular disease compared to balanced weight loss diets.
    PLoS ONE 01/2014; 9(7):e100652. · 3.53 Impact Factor


Available from