Does State Regulation of Quality Impose Costs on Nursing Homes?

Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Health Policy Research Institute, Irvine, CA 92697-5800, USA.
Medical care (Impact Factor: 2.94). 06/2011; 49(6):529-34. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318207ef9e
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Government regulation is intended to enhance quality, safety, fairness, or competition in the regulated industry. Such regulation entails both direct and indirect costs.
To estimate the costs associated with the regulation of quality of the nursing home industry.
This study includes 11,168 free-standing nursing homes nationally, between 2004 and 2006.
Data included information from the Medicare cost reports, Minimum Data Set, Medicare Denominator file, OSCAR, and a survey of States' Certification and Licensing Offices conducted by the authors. These data were used to create variables measuring nursing homes costs, outputs, wages, competition, adjusted deficiency citations, ownership, state-fixed effects, and an index of each state's regulatory stringency. We estimated hybrid cost functions which included the regulatory stringency index.
The estimated cost functions demonstrated the typical behavior expected of nursing home cost functions. The stringency index was positively and significantly associated with costs, indicating that nursing homes located in states with more stringent regulatory requirements face higher costs, ceteris paribus. The average incremental costs of a 1 standard deviation increase in the stringency index resulted in a 1.1% increase in costs.
This study for the first time places a price tag on the regulation of quality in nursing homes. It offers an order of magnitude on the costs to the industry of complying with the current set of standards and given the current level of enforcement. Complementary studies of the benefits that these regulations entail are needed to gain a comprehensive assessment of the effect of the regulation.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper examines the impact of an endogenous cost function variable on the inefficiency estimates generated by stochastic frontier analysis (SFA). The specific variable of interest in this application is endogenous quality in nursing homes. We simulate a dataset based on the characteristics of for-profit nursing homes in California, which we use to assess the impact on SFA-generated inefficiency estimates of an endogenous regressor under a variety of scenarios, including variations in the strength and direction of the endogeneity and whether the correlation is with the random noise or the inefficiency residual component of the error term. We compare each of these cases when quality is included and excluded from the cost equation. We provide evidence of the impact of endogeneity on inefficiency estimates yielded by SFA under these various scenarios and when the endogenous regressor is included and excluded from the model.
    Journal of Productivity Analysis 04/2012; 39(2). DOI:10.1007/s11123-012-0277-z · 0.87 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Singapore faces a rapidly aging population. By 2030, 19% of her population will be aged 65 years and above. Other Asian countries face similar problems, with South Korea having the fastest aging population worldwide, followed by China and Thailand. With Singapore possessing an advanced aging population, its policy provides a useful case study of eldercare to cater to evolving population demographics. This article will focus specifically on nursing homes and analyze current policies toward them, synthesize recommendations to improve long term care, and justify a paradigm shift toward more holistic, humanistic, and multidimensional care.
    Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 02/2014; 15(6). DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.12.082 · 4.78 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The high cost of the US health care system does not buy uniformly high quality of care. Concern about low quality has prompted two major types of public policy responses: regulation, a top-down approach, and report cards, a bottom-up approach. Each can result in either functional provider responses, which increase quality, or dysfunctional responses, which may lower quality. What do we know about the impacts of these two policy approaches to quality? To answer this question, we review the extant literature on regulation and report cards. We find evidence of both functional and dysfunctional effects. In addition, we identify the areas in which additional research would most likely be valuable. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health Volume 35 is March 18, 2014. Please see for revised estimates.
    Annual Review of Public Health 10/2013; DOI:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082313-115826 · 6.63 Impact Factor