Patterns of medication use during pregnancy in rheumatoid arthritis.

Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Arthritis care & research 05/2011; 63(5):721-8. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20422
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To characterize therapies prescribed during pregnancy to women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
We conducted a cohort study of women with RA with pregnancies using health care utilization data from 2002-2008. We examined the distribution of RA drugs by therapeutic classes, including nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)/coxibs, glucocorticoids, nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and biologic DMARDs, during 90-day pregnancy trimesters and the 180 days prior to pregnancy. Drugs were characterized according to the Food and Drug Administration risk classification system. Differences in exposure by period were determined by chi-square tests.
A total of 393 pregnancies were identified among 34,169 women with RA. Seventy-two percent of pregnancies ended in a delivery. Approximately 24% of women with RA received a DMARD during preconception. At any point during pregnancy, 23% of women with deliveries were dispensed ≥1 DMARD and the proportion of use declined from the first to the third trimester (P = 0.03). Similar to DMARD therapy, use of NSAIDs/coxibs and exposure to category D/X medications were significantly lower compared to prepregnancy use (P < 0.05). In contrast, more women were prescribed glucocorticoids during pregnancy than before pregnancy. Use of biologics occurred in 12.5% of pregnancies. Compared to women with deliveries, women who experienced abortions were more frequently exposed to NSAIDs/coxibs (P < 0.05). Dispensing of category D/X medications was also higher in women with spontaneous abortions and primarily involved methotrexate (P < 0.05).
Approximately 24% of women with RA received a DMARD in the 180 days before conception, and the proportion dropped during pregnancy. Glucocorticoid use remained high throughout pregnancy. Our results suggest that continued efforts directed at counseling women and their physicians about the potential risks/benefits of RA therapies during pregnancy are warranted.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of different data sources for pregnancy-related research in patients with rheumatic diseases. We describe challenges in studying adverse pregnancy outcomes in the setting of observational research, with a particular focus on the studies of maternal drug exposures. We discuss potential threats to validity in the assessment of exposure and outcomes and controlling for confounding; present findings from selected pregnancy-related observational studies conducted using data from registries and health plans; and highlight future research opportunities for pregnancy research. Registry and health plan data contribute complementary information to each other. Used together, linked data sources may allow clinicians, researchers, and patients to obtain a more complete understanding of the risk and benefits associated with maternal drug exposure and of the risk factors associated with adverse birth outcomes in women with rheumatic disease.
    Current opinion in rheumatology 05/2014; 26(3):315-20. · 5.07 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease of synovial joints, can lead to chronic pain and structural joint damage, as well as other organ involvement, especially if not adequately controlled. Because it can affect women in their reproductive years, care of pregnant women with RA requires a delicate balance of maintaining disease control while limiting potential toxicity to the fetus and neonate. While most women experience a substantial improvement in disease activity during pregnancy, for some women their RA remains active. It can even manifest itself for the first time during pregnancy or early in the post-partum period. Optimizing disease control prior to conception is key, but utilizing disease-modifying treatments effectively and safely throughout pregnancy and lactation requires open dialogue and shared decision making. This review provides evidence-based recommendations for use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic response modifiers to guide rheumatologists in their care of pregnant and lactating women with RA and serves as a guide to counsel male patients with RA on family planning decisions.
    Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease 10/2014; 6(5):169-84.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present work reviews the available data on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during pregnancy and the postpartum period. The data generally support some improvement in RA during pregnancy, but these data are not consistent, and a subgroup of patients may have significant disability and flares. The literature supports a tendency toward postpartum flares. Babies born to mothers with RA are found to have lower birth weight, intrauterine growth restriction, and an increased risk of delivery by cesarean section. Limited safety information is available for medications used for treatment during pregnancy and lactation. There are many options for treatment during the first trimester and throughout pregnancy, but each decision must be made on an individual basis. Whereas methotrexate and leflunomide are contraindicated in pregnancy, sulfasalazine is generally considered useful, as is hydroxychloroquine (despite the latter's FDA pregnancy category C rating). Of the biologics, the tumor necrosis factor (TNFi) are classified as category B; the other biologics vary between categories B and C, but more human data are available on TNFi. Drug Dev Res 72:689–702, 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Drug Development Research 12/2011; 72(8). · 0.87 Impact Factor


Available from