The ability of intensive care units to maintain zero central line-Associated bloodstream infections

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA.
Archives of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 17.33). 05/2011; 171(9):856-8. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.161
Source: PubMed
5 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite considerable efforts to improve healthcare quality and patient safety, broad measures of patient outcomes show little improvement. Many factors, including limited programme evaluations and understanding of whether quality improvement (QI) efforts are sustained, potentially contribute to the lack of widespread improvements in quality. This study examines whether hospitals participating in a Veterans Health Affairs QI collaborative have made and then sustained improvements. Separate patient-level risk-adjusted time-series models for two primary outcomes (hospital length of stay (LOS) and rate of discharges before noon) as well as three secondary outcomes (30-day all-cause hospital readmission, in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality). The models considered 2 years of pre-intervention data, 1 year of data to measure improvements and then 2 years of post-intervention data to see whether improvements were sustained. Among 130 Veterans Affairs hospitals, 35% and 46% exhibited improvements beyond baseline trends on LOS and discharges before noon, respectively. 60% of improving LOS hospitals exhibited sustained improvements, but only 32% for discharges by noon. Additional subgroup analyses by hospital size and region found a similar performance across most groups. This quasi-experimental evaluation found lower rates of improvements than normally reported in studies of QI collaboratives. The most striking observation was that a majority of hospitals increased their rates of discharges before noon, but after completing the collaborative their performance declined. Future work needs to qualitatively and quantitatively assess what organisational features distinguish those hospitals that can improve and sustain quality.
    BMJ quality & safety 04/2012; 21(8):663-9. DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000243 · 3.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many efforts to improve healthcare safety have focused on redesigning processes of care or retraining clinicians. Far less attention has been focused on the use of new technologies to improve safety. We present the results of a unique collaboration between the VA National Center for Patient Safety (NCPS) and the Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth College. Each year, the NCPS identifies safety problems across the VA that could be addressed with newly-engineered devices. Teams of Thayer students and faculty participating in a senior design course evaluate and engineer a solution for one of the problems. Exemplar projects have targeted surgical sponge retention, nosocomial infections, surgical site localization, and remote monitoring of hospitalized patients undergoing diagnostic testing and procedures. The program has served as an avenue for engineering students and health care workers to solve problems together. The success of this academic-clinical partnership could be replicated in other settings.
    Journal of Healthcare Engineering 09/2012; 3(3):431-442. DOI:10.1260/2040-2295.3.3.431 · 0.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are a significant cause of preventable harm. A collaborative project involving a multifaceted intervention was used in the Michigan Keystone Project and associated with significant reductions in these infections. This intervention included the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program, a multifaceted approach to CLABSI prevention, and the monitoring and reporting of infections. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the multifaceted intervention from the Michigan Keystone program could be implemented in Connecticut and to evaluate the impact on CLABSI rates in intensive care units (ICUs). The primary outcome was the NHSN-defined rate of CLABSI. Seventeen ICUs, representing 14 hospitals and 104,695 catheter days were analyzed. The study period included up to four quarters (12 months) of baseline data and seven quarters (21 months) of postintervention data. The overall mean (median) CLABSI rate decreased from 1.8 (1.8) infections per 1,000 catheter days at baseline to 1.1 (0) at seven quarters postimplementation of the intervention. This study demonstrated that the multifaceted intervention used in the Keystone program could be successfully implemented in another state and was associated with a reduction in CLABSI rates in Connecticut. Moreover, even though the statewide baseline CLABSI rate in Connecticut was low, rates were reduced even further and well below national benchmarks.
    Journal for Healthcare Quality 01/2013; 35(5). DOI:10.1111/j.1945-1474.2012.00210.x · 1.40 Impact Factor
Show more