Article

Early failure of articular surface replacement XL total hip arthroplasty.

OrthoCarolina, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina 28207, USA.
The Journal of arthroplasty (impact factor: 1.79). 05/2011; 26(6 Suppl):14-8. DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.027 pp.14-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The ASR (articular surface replacement) XL (DePuy, Warsaw, Ind) metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty offers the advantage of stability and increased motion. However, an alarming number of early failures prompted the evaluation of patients treated with this system. A prospective study of patients who underwent arthroplasty with the ASR XL system was performed. Patients with 2-year follow-up or any revision were included. Failure rates, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, and radiographs were evaluated. Ninety-five patients (105 hips) were included. There were 16 revisions. Thirteen (12%) were aseptic acetabular failures. Eight were revised for aseptic loosening; 4, for metallosis; 1, for malposition; 2, for infection; and 1, for periprosthetic fracture. Mean time to revision was 1.6 years (0.18-3.4 years). The ASR XL with a revision rate of 12% is the second reported 1 piece metal-on-metal system with a significant failure rate at early follow-up. This particular class of implants has inherent design flaws that lead to early failure.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
34 Views

Keywords

1 piece metal-on-metal system
 
articular surface replacement
 
aseptic
 
Failure rates
 
failures
 
malposition
 
McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
 
Mean time
 
metallosis
 
particular class
 
patients
 
periprosthetic fracture
 
prospective study
 
radiographs
 
revision rate
 
significant failure rate
 
Warsaw
 

Garen D Steele