Decision-Making and Outcomes of Feeding Tube Insertion: A Five-State Study

Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Impact Factor: 4.22). 05/2011; 59(5):881-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03385.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine family member's perceptions of decision-making and outcomes of feeding tubes.
Mortality follow-back survey. Sample weights were used to account for oversampling and survey design. A multivariate model examined the association between feeding tube use and overall quality of care rating regarding the last week of life.
Nursing homes, hospitals, and assisted living facilities.
Respondents whose relative had died from dementia in five states with varying feeding tube use.
Respondents were asked about discussions, decision-making, and outcomes related to their loved ones' feeding problems.
Of 486 family members surveyed, representing 9,652 relatives dying from dementia, 10.8% reported that the decedent had a feeding tube, 17.6% made a decision not to use a feeding tube, and 71.6% reported that there was no decision about feeding tubes. Of respondents for decedents with a feeding tube, 13.7% stated that there was no discussion about feeding tube insertion, and 41.6% reported a discussion that was shorter than 15 minutes. The risks associated with feeding tube insertion were not discussed in one-third of the cases, 51.8% felt that the healthcare provider was strongly in favor of feeding tube insertion, and 12.6% felt pressured by the physician to insert a feeding tube. The decedent was often physically (25.9%) or pharmacologically restrained (29.2%). Respondents whose loved ones died with a feeding tube were less likely to report excellent end-of-life care (adjusted odds ratio=0.42, 95% confidence interval=0.18-0.97) than those who were not.
Based on the perceptions of bereaved family members, important opportunities exist to improve decision-making in feeding tube insertion.

Download full-text


Available from: Vincent Mor, Apr 24, 2014
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To answer frequently asked questions about management of end-stage pneumonia, poor nutritional intake, and dehydration in advanced dementia. Ovid MEDLINE was searched for relevant articles published until February 2015. No level I studies were identified; most articles provided level III evidence. The symptom management suggestions are partially based on recent participation in a Delphi procedure to develop a guideline for optimal symptom relief for patients with pneumonia and dementia. Feeding tubes are not recommended for patients with end-stage dementia. Comfort feeding by hand is preferable. Use of parenteral hydration might be helpful but can also contribute to discomfort at the end of life. Withholding or withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration is generally not associated with manifestations of discomfort if mouth care is adequate. Because pneumonia usually causes considerable discomfort, clinicians should pay attention to symptom control. Sedation for agitation is often useful in patients with dementia in the terminal phase. Symptomatic care is an appropriate option for end-stage manifestations of advanced dementia. The proposed symptom management guidelines are based on a literature review and expert consensus. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.
    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien 04/2015; 61(4):337-341. · 1.40 Impact Factor
  • New England Journal of Medicine 02/2015; 372(7):678-82. DOI:10.1056/NEJMms1410321 · 54.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review addresses current controversies regarding appropriate indications for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) insertion. We address specific indications, namely, dementia, stroke, aspiration, motor neurone disease/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and head and neck cancer. We recommend practical strategies for improving patient selection. There is now a general consensus in the United States that PEG feeding does not benefit patients with advanced dementia. 'Early' PEG insertion following stroke is similarly of no benefit. It is currently unclear whether patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and head and neck tumors should have PEG or radiologically inserted gastrostomy. Decisions relating to PEG insertion remain difficult. The gastroenterologist, working as a member of a multidisciplinary nutrition team, needs to take a lead role in this regard, rather than functioning as a technician.
    Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 01/2015; 31(2). DOI:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000152 · 3.66 Impact Factor