A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with endostar for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (Impact Factor: 4.55). 06/2011; 6(6):1104-9. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182166b6b
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Recombinant human endostatin is a novel inhibitor of tumor angiogenesis that acts specifically on neovascular endothelial cells. Studies have shown that endostar plus vinorelbine-cisplatin chemotherapy could improve objective response rates (ORR) and overall survival (OS) of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This study is to explore the clinical efficacy of endostar plus paclitaxel-carboplatin (TC) in advanced NSCLC patients.
A phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out. Patients were randomly assigned to the treatment (TC + endostar) or the control group (TC + placebo). The efficacy was evaluated at the end of each cycle. Follow-up continued until disease progression or death.
A total of 126 patients were enrolled, of whom 122 were evaluable, with 61 in each group. ORR was 39.3% in the treatment group versus 23.0% in the control group (p = 0.078), and the disease control rate was 90.2% versus 67.2% (p = 0.004), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 versus 6.3 months (p = 0.522) in the treatment and control groups, the 24-week rate of PFS was 78% versus 59% (p = 0.017), and the median OS was 17.6 versus 15.8 months (p = 0.696), respectively. There were no significant differences, either in the incidence of adverse events or serious adverse events, between the two groups.
In previously untreated, advanced NSCLC patients, treatment with TC plus endostar seemed to improve ORR. However, the differences in PFS or OS between the two groups were not statistically significant. Treatment with TC plus endostar exhibited a good safety profile.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Based on promising efficacy in a single-arm study, a randomized phase II trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of adding rh-endostatin (Endostar) to first-line standard etoposide and carboplatin (EC) chemotherapy for treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. One hundred forty Chinese patients with pathologically confirmed, extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned to EC alone or rh-endostatin + EC for 4-6 cycles, followed by single-agent rh-endostatin until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival, Objective response rate (ORR), and quality of life. Median PFS was 6.4 months with rh-endostatin + EC (n = 69) and 5.9 months with EC (n = 69) (hazard ratio 0.8 [95% confidence interval 0.6-1.1]). PFS was significantly higher with rh-endostatin + EC than with EC (hazard ratio 0.4 [0.2-0.9; p = 0.020]) in female. Median overall survival was similar in both groups (12.1 versus 12.4 months, respectively [p = 0.82]). ORR was higher in the rh-endostatin + EC group (75.4%) than in the EC group (66.7%) (p = 0.348). The efficacy of rh-endostatin + EC relative to that of EC was reflected by greater improvements in patient-assessed quality of life scores after 4 and 6 weeks of treatment. There was no difference between each regimen in the incidence of nonhematological or Grade III-IV hematological toxicities. Addition of rh-endostatin to EC for the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer had an acceptable toxicity profile, but did not improve overall survival, PFS, and ORR.
    Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 01/2015; 10(1):206-11. DOI:10.1097/JTO.0000000000000343 · 4.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PEGylated recombinant human endostatin (M2ES) exhibited prolonged serum half-life and enhanced antitumor activity when compared with endostatin. A non-clinical study was performed to evaluate the toxicokinetics and safety of M2ES in rhesus monkeys. After intravenous (IV) infusions of M2ES at a dose level of 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg in rhesus monkeys, the concentration-time curves of M2ES were best fitted to a non-compartment model, and area under the curve (AUC) was positively correlated with the dosage. M2ES had a tendency to accumulate in vivo following successive IV infusions. Serum anti-M2ES IgG antibodies were generated quickly during IV administration, and the antibody level in serum did not significantly decrease after four-week recovery period. Animals administered IV infusions twice weekly (M2ES at 10 or 30 mg/kg body weight per day) for 3 months developed mild or moderate vacuolation of proximal tubule epithelial cell in proximal convoluted tubule of kidney, but this adverse-effect was reversible. In summary, M2ES was well tolerated and did not cause any serious toxicity. These pre-clinical safety data contribute to the initiation of the ongoing clinical study.
    Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 05/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.05.019 · 2.14 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: IntroductionThe aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of dicycloplatin plus paclitaxel with those of carboplatin plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Material and methodsIn this study, 240 NSCLC patients with stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) and stage IV disease were randomly assigned (1: 1) to receive dicycloplatin 450 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC = 5, in combination with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (D + P or C + P) every 3 weeks for up to 4 to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was response rate. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events.ResultsThe response rates for the D + P and C + P arm were 36.44% and 30.51%, respectively (p = 0.33). The median PFS was 5.6 months in the D + P arm and 4.7 months in the C + P arm (p = 0.31). The median OS was 14.9 months for D + P and 12.9 months for C + P (p = 0.37). Adverse events in the two arms were well balanced. The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was hematologic toxicity.ConclusionsPatients treated with D + P had similar response and survival rates to those treated with C + P, and toxicities of both treatments were generally tolerable.
    Archives of Medical Science 08/2014; 10(4):717-724. DOI:10.5114/aoms.2014.44862 · 1.89 Impact Factor
    This article is viewable in ResearchGate's enriched format