Article

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Paclitaxel-Carboplatin Alone or with Endostar for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (Impact Factor: 5.8). 06/2011; 6(6):1104-9. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182166b6b
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Recombinant human endostatin is a novel inhibitor of tumor angiogenesis that acts specifically on neovascular endothelial cells. Studies have shown that endostar plus vinorelbine-cisplatin chemotherapy could improve objective response rates (ORR) and overall survival (OS) of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This study is to explore the clinical efficacy of endostar plus paclitaxel-carboplatin (TC) in advanced NSCLC patients.
A phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out. Patients were randomly assigned to the treatment (TC + endostar) or the control group (TC + placebo). The efficacy was evaluated at the end of each cycle. Follow-up continued until disease progression or death.
A total of 126 patients were enrolled, of whom 122 were evaluable, with 61 in each group. ORR was 39.3% in the treatment group versus 23.0% in the control group (p = 0.078), and the disease control rate was 90.2% versus 67.2% (p = 0.004), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 versus 6.3 months (p = 0.522) in the treatment and control groups, the 24-week rate of PFS was 78% versus 59% (p = 0.017), and the median OS was 17.6 versus 15.8 months (p = 0.696), respectively. There were no significant differences, either in the incidence of adverse events or serious adverse events, between the two groups.
In previously untreated, advanced NSCLC patients, treatment with TC plus endostar seemed to improve ORR. However, the differences in PFS or OS between the two groups were not statistically significant. Treatment with TC plus endostar exhibited a good safety profile.

0 Followers
 · 
127 Views
  • Source
    • "human endostatin with a nine amino acid sequence at the N-terminus (MGGSHHHHH), expressed by E. coli, was approved by the CFDA for good clinical responses (Cui et al., 2013; Han et al., 2011). To explain this difference, we analyzed the structure of P. pastoris-expressed and E. coli-expressed endostatin, and found that almost 93% of P. pastoris-expressed endostatin was truncated and lost its zinc binding capacity. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PEGylated recombinant human endostatin (M2ES) exhibited prolonged serum half-life and enhanced antitumor activity when compared with endostatin. A non-clinical study was performed to evaluate the toxicokinetics and safety of M2ES in rhesus monkeys. After intravenous (IV) infusions of M2ES at a dose level of 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg in rhesus monkeys, the concentration-time curves of M2ES were best fitted to a non-compartment model, and area under the curve (AUC) was positively correlated with the dosage. M2ES had a tendency to accumulate in vivo following successive IV infusions. Serum anti-M2ES IgG antibodies were generated quickly during IV administration, and the antibody level in serum did not significantly decrease after four-week recovery period. Animals administered IV infusions twice weekly (M2ES at 10 or 30 mg/kg body weight per day) for 3 months developed mild or moderate vacuolation of proximal tubule epithelial cell in proximal convoluted tubule of kidney, but this adverse-effect was reversible. In summary, M2ES was well tolerated and did not cause any serious toxicity. These pre-clinical safety data contribute to the initiation of the ongoing clinical study.
    Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 01/2014; · 2.14 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The tumor vasculature is an increasingly attractive target for development of anticancer drugs. The fundamental principle for antiangiogenic cancer therapy is based on the inhibitory effect of chemical compounds, proteins or nucleotides on tumor angiogenesis. Indeed, in almost all preclinical tumor models, antiangiogenic monotherapy with different agents shows potent effects on suppression of tumor growth. However, antiangiogenic monotherapy has barely produced any clinical benefits in cancer patients. Although in combination with chemotherapy some antiangiogenic drugs demonstrate survival improvement in patients with certain types of cancers, the overall benefits by addition of antiangiogenic drugs (ADs) to chemotherapy remain modest. The disparity of AD responses between preclinical models and clinical cancer patients has raised important issues, which include: 1) Are current animal tumor models appropriate for assessing the therapeutic efficacy of ADs for clinical development? 2) What are the key differences between mouse tumor models and human cancer patients? 3) Are anti-VEGF drugs off target in cancer patients? 4) What are alternative options for improvement of the clinical benefits of ADs? In this short review, I discuss these critical issues in relation to the clinical practice of ADs.
    The International journal of developmental biology 01/2011; 55(4-5):557-62. DOI:10.1387/ijdb.103236yc · 2.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Particulate carriers are necessary to control the release of endostar and prolong its circulation in vivo. The purpose of this study was to identify a suitable carrier for the capsulation and delivery of endostar. We prepared a series of poly (DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) and poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG)-modified PLGA (PEG-PLGA) particulate carriers, and then characterized them according to their ability to prolong the circulation of endostar, their physicochemical properties, endostar-loading content, and in vitro and in vivo particulate carrier release profiles. All the particulate carriers had spherical core shell structures. The PEG-PLGA material and nanosize range appeared to enable the carriers to encapsulate more endostar, release endostar faster in vitro, and accumulate more endostar in vivo. The drug loading capacity of PEG-PLGA and PLGA nanoparticles was 8.03% ± 3.41% and 3.27% ± 5.26%, respectively, and for PEG-PLGA and PLGA microspheres was 15.32% ± 5.61% and 9.21% ± 4.73%. The cumulative amount of endostar released from the carriers in phosphate-buffered saline over 21 days was 23.79%, 20.45%, 15.13%, and 10.41%, respectively. Moreover, the terminal elimination half-life of endostar in the rabbit was 26.91 ± 7.93 hours and 9.32 ± 5.53 hours in the PEG-PLGA group and the PLGA nanoparticle group. Peak endostar concentration was reached at day 7 in the group treated with subcutaneous injection of PEG-PLGA microspheres and at day 14 in the group receiving subcutaneous injection of PLGA microspheres. Endostar was detectable in vivo in both groups after injection of the particulate carriers. PEG-PLGA nanoparticles might be better than other nanoparticulate carriers for encapsulation and distribution of endostar.
    International Journal of Nanomedicine 07/2011; 6:1535-41. DOI:10.2147/IJN.S21881 · 4.38 Impact Factor
Show more