Perceived coercion and the therapeutic relationship: a neglected association?

Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) (Impact Factor: 2.81). 05/2011; 62(5):471-6. DOI: 10.1176/
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Increasing patient autonomy and decreasing coercion are frequently cited goals in mental health care. Research suggests that the therapeutic relationship and patients' experiences of coercion may be associated. This study investigated the association between the therapeutic relationship and perceived coercion in psychiatric admissions.
Associations between perceived coercion and the therapeutic relationship and sociodemographic and clinical variables were examined by using data from structured interviews with 164 patients consecutively admitted to two psychiatric hospitals in Oxford, England.
High levels of coercion were experienced by 48% of voluntarily and 89% of involuntarily admitted patients. A high perceived coercion score was significantly associated with involuntary admission and a poor rating of the therapeutic relationship. The therapeutic relationship confounded legal status as a predictor of perceived coercion.
Similar factors may influence patients' experience of both coercion and the therapeutic relationship during psychiatric hospital admission. Hospitalization, even when voluntary, was viewed as more coercive when patients rated their relationship with the admitting clinician negatively. Interventions to improve the therapeutic relationship may reduce perceptions of coercion.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Therapeutic relationships are considered a key component of good psychiatric care, yet its association with outcomes for individuals with psychosis remains unclear. 569 service users with psychotic disorders and care coordinators in community settings rated their therapeutic relationship; outcomes were assessed 18 months later. In multivariate analyses, a small but significant association was found between service user ratings and instances of psychiatric hospital admissions, self harm and suicide attempts over an 18 month period. Care coordinator ratings were associated with instances of psychiatric hospital admissions and harm to others over the 18 months and level of functioning at 18 months. The differential findings and small effect size suggests that the therapeutic relationship needs further definition for this patient group in this setting. Nevertheless, clinicians should prioritise interactions that strengthen therapeutic relationships.
    Psychiatry Research 12/2014; · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Legal leverage is broadly defined as the use of legal authority to promote treatment adherence. It is widely utilized within mental health courts, drug courts, mandated outpatient treatment programs, and other intervention strategies for individuals with mental illness or chemical dependency who have contact with the criminal justice system. Nonetheless, the ethics of using legal authority to promote treatment adherence remains a hotly debated issue within public and professional circles alike. While critics characterize legal leverage as a coercive form of social control that undermines personal autonomy, advocates contend that it supports autonomy because treatment strategies using legal leverage are designed to promote health and independence. Despite the controversy, there is little evidence regarding the impact of legal leverage on patient autonomy as experienced and expressed by patients themselves. This report presents findings from a qualitative study involving six focus groups with severely mentally ill outpatients who received legal leverage through three forensic assertive community treatment (FACT) programs in Northeastern, Midwestern, and West Coast cities. Findings are discussed in the context of the self-determination theory of human motivation, and practical implications for the use of legal leverage are considered.
    Harvard Review of Psychiatry 06/2014; · 2.49 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This pilot study aimed at investigating how mental health professionals on acute psychiatric wards recognize different levels of formal and informal coercions and treatment pressures as well as their attitude towards these interventions. An explorative cross-sectional survey among mental health professionals (N=39) was conducted using a questionnaire that consisted of 15 vignettes describing typical clinical situations on five different stages of the continuum of coercion. Low levels of coercion are recognized adequately while higher levels are grossly underestimated. The degree of coercion inherent to interventions comprising persuasion and leverage was underestimated by professionals with a positive attitude and overestimated by those with a negative attitude towards the respective interventions. No associations of the ability to recognize different levels of coercion with ward or staff related variables were found. Higher knowledge on ambiguous variations of coercive interventions seems to foster more balanced reflections about their ethical implications. Advanced understanding of influencing factors of professionals׳ attitudes towards coercion could lead to improved training of professionals in utilizing interventions to enhance treatment adherence in an informed and ethical way.
    Psychiatry Research 08/2014; · 2.68 Impact Factor


Available from
May 27, 2014