Article

Increase in Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy in the United States: A Comparison of National Surveys of Ambulatory Surgery, 1996 and 2006

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-Davis, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Impact Factor: 4.31). 04/2011; 93(11):994-1000. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01618
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study was proposed to investigate the changes in the utilization of knee arthroscopy in an ambulatory setting over the past decade in the United States as well as its implications.
The National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery, last carried out in 1996, was conducted again in 2006 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We analyzed the cases with procedure coding indicative of knee arthroscopy or anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. To produce estimates for all arthroscopic procedures on the knee in an ambulatory setting in the United States for each year, we performed a design-based statistical analysis.
The number of arthroscopic procedures on the knee increased 49% between 1996 and 2006. While the number of arthroscopic procedures for knee injury had dramatically increased, arthroscopic procedures for knee osteoarthritis had decreased. In 1996, knee arthroscopies performed in freestanding ambulatory surgery centers comprised only 15% of all orthopaedic procedures, but the proportion increased to 51% in 2006. There was a large increase in knee arthroscopy among middle-aged patients regardless of sex. In 2006, >99% of arthroscopic procedures on the knee were in an outpatient setting. Approximately 984,607 arthroscopic procedures on the knee (95% confidence interval, 895,999 to 1,073,215) were performed in an outpatient setting in 2006. Among those, 127,446 procedures (95% confidence interval, 95,124 to 159,768) were for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Nearly 500,000 arthroscopic procedures were performed for medial or lateral meniscal tears.
This study revealed that the knee arthroscopy rate in the United States was more than twofold higher than in England or Ontario, Canada, in 2006. Our study found that nearly half of the knee arthroscopic procedures were performed for meniscal tears. Meniscal damage, detected by magnetic resonance imaging, is commonly assumed to be the source of pain and symptoms. Further study is imperative to better define the symptoms, physical findings, and radiographic findings that are predictive of successful arthroscopic treatment.

2 Followers
 · 
137 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative prereconstruction stability measurements and/or patient characteristics were associated with final knee stability after computer-assisted ACL reconstruction. Methods. This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent computer-assisted single-bundle ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon. Prereconstruction intraoperative stability measurements were correlated with patient characteristics and postreconstruction stability measurements. 143 patients were included (87 male and 56 female). Average age was 29.8 years (SD ± 11.8). Results. Females were found to have significantly more pre- and postreconstruction internal rotation than males (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, resp.). Patients with additional intra-articular injuries demonstrated more prereconstruction anterior instability than patients with isolated ACL tears (P < 0.001). After reconstruction, these patients also had higher residual anterior translation (P = 0.01). Among all patients with ACL reconstructions, the percent of correction of anterior translation was found to be significantly higher than the percent of correction for internal or external rotation (P < 0.001). Conclusion. Anterior translation was corrected the most using a single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Females had higher pre- and postoperative internal rotation. Patients with additional injuries had greater original anterior translation and less operative correction of anterior translation compared to patients with isolated ACL tears.
    01/2015; 2015:638635. DOI:10.1155/2015/638635
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the well-established role of sex on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk, its effects on ACL surgical outcomes remain controversial. This is particularly critical when developing novel surgical techniques to treat the injury because there are limited data existing on how these procedures will respond in each sex. One such approach is bridge-enhanced ACL repair, in which primary suture repair of the ACL is augmented with a bioactive scaffold saturated with autologous blood. It has shown comparable biomechanical outcomes to ACL reconstruction in preclinical models. We asked (1) whether sex affects the biomechanical outcomes of bridge-enhanced ACL repair; and (2) if suture type (absorbable or nonabsorbable), used to repair the torn ACL, can minimize the potential sex discrepancies in outcomes after 15 weeks of healing in a large animal preclinical model. Seventeen (eight males, nine females) Yorkshire pigs (Parson's Farms, Hadley, MA, USA) underwent bilateral ACL transection and received bridge-enhanced ACL repair with an absorbable suture (n = 17) on one side and with a nonabsorbable suture (n = 17) on the other side. The leg receiving the absorbable suture was randomized within each animal. ACL structural properties and AP knee laxity for each knee were measured after 15 weeks of healing. Mixed linear models were used to compare the biomechanical outcomes between sexes and suture groups. When treated with absorbable suture, females had a lower ACL linear stiffness (females, 11 N/mm [range, 8-42]; males, 31 N/mm [range, 12-56]; difference, 20 N/mm [95% confidence interval {CI}, 4-36]; p = 0.032), ACL yield (females, 121 N [range, 56-316]; males, 224 N [range, 55-538]; difference, 103 N [95% CI, 6-200]; p = 0.078), and maximum load (females, 128 N [range, 63-332]; males, 241 N [range, 82-538]; difference, 114 N [95% CI, 15-212]; p = 0.052) than males after 15 weeks of healing. Female knees treated with absorbable suture had a lower linear stiffness (absorbable, 11 N/mm [range, 8-42]; nonabsorbable, 25 N/mm [range, 8-64]; difference, 14 [95% CI, 2-26] N; p = 0.054), ACL yield (absorbable, 121 N [range, 56-316]; nonabsorbable, 230 N [range, 149-573]; difference, 109 N [95% CI, 56-162]; p = 0.002), and maximum load (absorbable, 128 N [range, 63-332]; nonabsorbable, 235 N [range, 151-593]; difference, 107 N [95% CI, 51-163]; p = 0.002) along with greater AP knee laxity at 30° (absorbable, 9 mm [range, 5-12]; nonabsorbable, 7 mm [range, 2-13]; difference, 2 mm [95% CI, 1-4]; p = 0.034) than females treated with nonabsorbable suture. When repaired using nonabsorbable suture, the biomechanical outcomes were similar between female and male knees (p > 0.10). Females had significantly worse biomechanical outcomes than males when the repairs were performed using absorbable sutures. However, the use of nonabsorbable sutures ameliorated these differences between males and females. The current findings highlight the critical role of sex on the biomechanical outcomes of bridge-enhanced ACL repair in a relevant large animal model. Better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for these observations using preclinical models and concomitant clinical studies in human patients may allow for additional development of sex-specific surgical and rehabilitative strategies with potentially improved outcomes in women.
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 03/2015; DOI:10.1007/s11999-015-4226-9 · 2.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In orthopedic surgery there has been a never-ending quest to improve surgical outcome and the patient's experience. Progression has been marked by the refinement of surgical techniques and instruments and later by enhanced diagnostic imaging capability, specifically magnetic resonance. Over time implant optimization was achieved, along with the development of innovative minimally invasive arthroscopic technical skills to leverage new versions of classic procedures and implants to improve short-term patient morbidity and initial, mid-term, and long-term patient outcomes. The use of regenerative and/or biological adjuncts to aid the healing process has followed in the drive for continual improvement, and major breakthroughs in basic science have significantly unraveled the mechanisms of key healing and regenerative pathways. A wide spectrum of primary and complementary regenerative treatments is becoming increasingly available, including blood-derived preparations, growth factors, bone marrow preparations, and stem cells. This is a new era in the application of biologically active material, and it is transforming clinical practice by providing effective supportive treatments either at the time of the index procedure or during the postoperative period. Regenerative treatments are currently in active use to enhance many areas of orthopedic surgery in an attempt to improve success and outcome. In this review we provide a comprehensive overview of the peer-reviewed evidence-based literature, highlighting the clinical outcomes in humans both with preclinical data and human clinical trials involving regenerative preparations within the areas of rotator cuff, meniscus, ligament, and articular cartilage surgical repair. Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    PM&R 04/2015; 14(4 Suppl). DOI:10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.01.015 · 1.66 Impact Factor