Article

An Epigenetic Signature for Monoallelic Olfactory Receptor Expression

Department of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Cell (Impact Factor: 33.12). 05/2011; 145(4):555-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.040
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Constitutive heterochromatin is traditionally viewed as the static form of heterochromatin that silences pericentromeric and telomeric repeats in a cell cycle- and differentiation-independent manner. Here, we show that, in the mouse olfactory epithelium, olfactory receptor (OR) genes are marked in a highly dynamic fashion with the molecular hallmarks of constitutive heterochromatin, H3K9me3 and H4K20me3. The cell type and developmentally dependent deposition of these marks along the OR clusters are, most likely, reversed during the process of OR choice to allow for monogenic and monoallelic OR expression. In contrast to the current view of OR choice, our data suggest that OR silencing takes place before OR expression, indicating that it is not the product of an OR-elicited feedback signal. Our findings suggest that chromatin-mediated silencing lays a molecular foundation upon which singular and stochastic selection for gene expression can be applied.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Gilad Barnea, Apr 22, 2014
2 Followers
 · 
237 Views
  • Source
    • "The stem cells in the olfactory epithelia are capable of generating neurons as well as supporting (glial) cells (Leung et al., 2007). The neurons that are generated choose a receptor " identity " ; each sensory neuron usually expresses a single vomeronasal or odorant receptor, and this gene choice is highly regulated (Shykind et al., 2004; Lomvardas et al., 2006; Magklara et al., 2011; Lyons et al., 2013). In addition, the developmental process of aging regulates olfactory neurogenesis. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neurogenesis continues well beyond embryonic and early postnatal ages in three areas of the nervous system. The subgranular zone supplies new neurons to the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. The subventricular zone supplies new interneurons to the olfactory bulb, and the olfactory neuroepithelia generate new excitatory sensory neurons that send their axons to the olfactory bulb. The latter two areas are of particular interest as they contribute new neurons to both ends of a first-level circuit governing olfactory perception. The vomeronasal organ and the main olfactory epithelium comprise the primary peripheral olfactory epithelia. These anatomically distinct areas share common features, as each exhibits extensive neurogenesis well beyond the juvenile phase of development. Here we will discuss the effect of age on the structural and functional significance of neurogenesis in the vomeronasal and olfactory epithelia, from juvenile to advanced adult ages, in several common model systems. We will next discuss how age affects the regenerative capacity of these neural stem cells in response to injury. Finally, we will consider the integration of newborn neurons into an existing circuit as it is modified by the age of the animal.
    Frontiers in Neuroscience 06/2014; 8:182. DOI:10.3389/fnins.2014.00182 · 3.70 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In the mammalian central nervous system, each olfactory sensory neuron expresses only one olfactory receptor (OR) from a family of ∼1200 genes (Buck and Axel, 1991). Before an OR gene is expressed, all alleles are silenced and converted to heterochromatin (Magklara et al., 2011). A limiting enzymatic activity then stochastically removes the heterochromatin marks from one allele to activate it. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: eLife digest African sleeping sickness is a potentially lethal disease that is caused by a parasite called T. brucei and spread by tsetse flies. Like many of the parasites that cause tropical diseases, T. brucei employs genetic trickery to evade the immune systems of humans and other mammals. This involves changing the variant surface glycoprotein (VSG) coat that surrounds the parasite on a regular basis in order to remain one step ahead of the immune system of its host: while the immune system looks for invaders wearing a particular coat, the parasites are spreading through the host in a completely different coat. To infect other hosts, the parasite must undergo changes that allow it to re-infect the tsetse fly. Therefore, besides the ‘antigenic variation’ that allows it to change its surface coat when it is in the blood of its host, T. brucei must undergo a more fundamental metamorphosis before it is capable of colonizing the tsetse fly. However, many details of the changes that allow the parasites to re-infect flies are not understood. T. brucei has several hundred VSG genes clustered in about 15 regions known as expression sites, but only a single expression site is active at any given time. Each expression site also contains a number of other genes known as expression site-associated genes (ESAGs). Antigenic variation can occur as a result of different VSG genes within the same expression site being expressed as proteins, or when the active expression site is silenced and another expression site is activated. This is another process that is not fully understood. Batram et al. now reveal that the expression of VSG genes, antigenic variation and the changes that allow the parasites to re-infect flies are all related to each other. This suggests that the expression site could provide a new point of attack in the fight against African sleeping sickness. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02324.002
    eLife Sciences 05/2014; 3:e02324. DOI:10.7554/eLife.02324 · 8.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Virtually nothing is understood about the establishment of MAE during development and differentiation. Mechanistically, allelic choice has been linked to changes in chromatin states in some special cases: imprinting (Wen et al., 2008), olfactory receptor gene choice (Magklara et al., 2011), and immunoglobulin-kappa gene rearrangement (Farago et al., 2012). In contrast, for hundreds of other autosomal MAE genes, no molecular features have been associated with establishment and maintenance of allelic choice. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: eLife digest Understanding how genes are activated and silenced is one of the central challenges in modern biology. These processes underpin the development of a fertilized egg into a complex organism, and they can also lead to life-threatening diseases when they go wrong. There are two copies of each gene in a human cell, a maternal copy and a paternal copy, and it is thought that both copies are usually regulated together. However, there are exceptions to this rule: for certain genes only the maternal copy is expressed as a protein in some cells, whereas the paternal copy is expressed in other cells. This form of gene regulation, which is called monoallelic expression, can result in neighboring cells heading down very different paths. In extreme cases, depending on the differences between the two copies of the gene, cells that express one copy may function normally, while cells where the other copy is activated will start forming tumors. However, despite these potentially grave consequences, and early results which suggested that monoallelic expression affected a large number of human and mouse genes, it has proved to be a major technical challenge to identify these genes in most cell types. Now, Nag, Savova et al. have discovered a molecular signature that can be used to detect monoallelic expression. The signature was found in chromatin, the densely packed structure formed by DNA and proteins inside the cell nucleus. Nag, Savova et al. discovered that the genes that are subject to monoallelic expression are bound with proteins that are modified in two contrasting ways. One modification, which is usually a sign of gene silencing, is prevalent on the inactive copy of the gene, and the other, which often marks active genes, is chiefly present on the active copy. Nag, Savova et al. report that these modifications are found in different sets of genes in different cell types, indicating distinct genome-wide patterns of monoallelic expression. The chromatin signature approach lets them estimate the fraction of human genes that are subject to monoallelic expression. This number is surprisingly high: about 20% of commonly expressed genes and more than one-third of tissue-specific genes. In a particularly intriguing finding, almost all bivalent genes—a subset of genes that are involved in determining the fate of cell during development—are estimated to become monoallelic when they are activated. In addition to these unexpected findings, the chromatin signature approach opens the door to exploring monoallelic expression as a form of gene regulation in all types of cells and, ultimately, to understanding how it is involved in both normal development and in disease. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01256.002
    eLife Sciences 12/2013; 2:e01256. DOI:10.7554/eLife.01256 · 8.52 Impact Factor
Show more