Article

B(1)(+)/actual flip angle and reception sensitivity mapping methods: simulation and comparison.

Institute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Pisa, Italy.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Impact Factor: 2.02). 06/2011; 29(5):717-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.01.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Knowledge of the spatial distribution of transmission field B(1)(+) and reception sensitivity maps is important in high-field (≥3 T) human magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for several reasons: these include post-acquisition correction of intensity inhomogeneities, which may affect the quality of images; modeling and design of radiofrequency (RF) coils and pulses; validating theoretical models for electromagnetic field calculations; testing the compatibility with MR environment of biomedical implants. Moreover, inhomogeneities in the RF field are an essential source of error for quantitative MR spectroscopy. Recent studies have also shown that B(1)(+) and reception sensitivity maps can be used for direct calculation of tissue electrical parameters and for estimating the local specific absorption rate (SAR) in vivo. Several B(1)(+) mapping techniques have been introduced in the past few years based on actual flip angle (FA) mapping, but, to date, none has emerged as a standard. For reception sensitivity calculation, the signal intensity equation can be used where the nominal FA distribution must be replaced with the actual FA distribution calculated by one of the B(1)(+) mapping techniques. This study introduces a quantitative comparison between two known methods for B(1)(+)/actual FA and reception sensitivity mapping: the double-angle method (DAM) and the fitting (FIT) method. Experimental data obtained using DAM and FIT methods are also compared with numerical simulation results.

0 Followers
 · 
123 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sodium MRI is a powerful tool for providing biochemical information on the tissue viability, cell integrity and function in quantitative and noninvasive manner and it has already been applied in vivo in most human tissues. Although it could provide useful and new information not available with classic proton MRI, the low detectable sodium signal gives rise to technological limitations in terms of data quality when using clinical scanners. The design of dedicated coils capable of providing large field of view with high Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) data is of fundamental importance. This work presents magnetostatic simulation, test and application of a transmit/receive circular coil designed for 23Na MR experiments in phantoms and humans with a clinical 3T scanner. In particular, the paper provides details of the design, modeling and construction of the coil. Such coil prototype was tested at workbench by using a dual-loop probe and a network analyzer, for quality factors and Q ratios measurements. Finally, the coil was employed in MR experiments to acquire phantom and in vivo data on different human organs (heart, kidney, calf and brain).
    Measurement 04/2014; 50:285–292. DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2014.01.006 · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Numerical methods based on solutions of Maxwell's equations are usually adopted for the electromagnetic characterization of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Radiofrequency (RF) coils. In this context, many different numerical methods can be employed, including time domain methods, e.g., the Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD), and frequency domain methods, e.g., the Finite Element Methods (FEM) and the Method of Moments (MoM). We provide
    Progress In Electromagnetics Research M 01/2013; 29:121-136. DOI:10.2528/PIERM12122113
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is considered a safe technology since it does not use ionizing radiation with high energy to detach electrons from atoms or molecules. However, as in any healthcare intervention, even in an MRI diagnostic procedure there are intrinsic hazards that must be understood and taken into consideration. Moreover, given the increasing number of clinical MRI exams and the widespread availability of MR scanners with high static magnetic fields (>3T), the consideration of possible risks and health effects associated with MRI procedures is gaining in importance and the term "dosimetry" has begun to be used also for non ionizing techniques as MRI. Engineering techniques are increasingly used in MRI to explain the interactions between electromagnetic fields and the human body, analyze aspects relative to signal and image generation, and assure patient and staff safety and comfort. In this review some engineering methods to quantify the interactions between MR fields and biological tissues will be reviewed and catalogued to aid the readers in finding resources for their own applications in MRI safety assurance. This paper should not be intended as another review of the biological effects of MRI but, for the reader's convenience, the possible hazards for each kind of MR magnetic field, will be anyway briefly described. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging 02/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2015.02.001 · 2.02 Impact Factor