Article

Prognosis in patients with sentinel node-positive melanoma is accurately defined by the combined Rotterdam tumor load and Dewar topography criteria.

Erasmus University Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Journal of Clinical Oncology (Impact Factor: 18.04). 06/2011; 29(16):2206-14. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6760
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Prognosis in patients with sentinel node (SN)-positive melanoma correlates with several characteristics of the metastases in the SN such as size and site. These factors reflect biologic behavior and may separate out patients who may or may not need additional locoregional and/or systemic therapy.
Between 1993 and 2008, 1,080 patients (509 women and 571 men) were diagnosed with tumor burden in the SN in nine European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) melanoma group centers. In total, 1,009 patients (93%) underwent completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Median Breslow thickness was 3.00 mm. The median follow-up time was 37 months. Tumor load and tumor site were reclassified in all nodes by the Rotterdam criteria for size and in 88% by the Dewar criteria for topography.
Patients with submicrometastases (< 0.1 mm in diameter) were shown to have an estimated 5-year overall survival rate of 91% and a low nonsentinel node (NSN) positivity rate of 9%. This is comparable to the rate in SN-negative patients. The strongest predictive parameter for NSN positivity and prognostic parameter for survival was the Rotterdam-Dewar Combined (RDC) criteria. Patients with submicrometastases that were present in the subcapsular area only, had an NSN positivity rate of 2% and an estimated 5- and 10-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS) of 95%.
Patients with metastases < 0.1 mm, especially when present in the subcapsular area only, may be overtreated by a routine CLND and have an MSS that is indistinguishable from that of SN-negative patients. Thus the RDC criteria provide a rational basis for decision making in the absence of conclusions provided by randomized controlled trials.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
156 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To validate metastasis location, maximum metastasis diameter (MMD) measurement induced stage migration and the prognostic significance of total metastatic volume (TMV) in melanoma sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). A new 227 patient SLN cohort examined by complete step sectioning (250 μm) was tested for TMV and MMD prognostic significance; metastasis location by three different three-level protocols (Central vs Peripheral vs Global); and potential treatment changing down-staging by two restricted five-level protocols [Reduced Central (250 μm) vs Reduced Even (500 μm) sections]. Both TMV and MMD independently predicted recurrence (TMV, hazard ratio (HR): 1.21; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07–1.37; p = 0.003; and MMD, HR: 1.46; 95% CI 1.08–1.98, p = 0.02) and melanoma-specific death (TMV, HR: 1.30; 95% CI 1.11–1.51; p = 0.001; and MMD, HR: 1.82; 95% CI 1.25–2.66, p = 0.002). The Central, Peripheral and Global protocols detected 72%, 76% and 83% of metastases found by complete step sectioning. Based on MMD, using the Reduced Central or Reduced Even protocols, potential treatment changing down-staging occurred in 20 (20%) or 13 (13%) of SLN-positive patients. This validation study establishes that: (i) metastases are globally located in melanoma SLNs; (ii) MMD but not TMV leads to uni-directional stage migration; and (iii) TMV analysis is of prognostic significance.
    Apmis 03/2014; · 2.07 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 04/2014; · 15.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cutaneous melanoma (CM) causes the greatest number of skin cancer-related deaths worldwide. Predicting CM prognosis is important to determine the need for further investigation, counseling of patients, to guide appropriate management (particularly the need for postoperative adjuvant therapy), and for assignment of risk status in groups of patients entering clinical trials. Since recurrence rate is largely independent from stages defined by morphological and morphometric criteria, there is a strong need for identification of additional robust prognostic factors to support decision-making processes. Most data on prognostic biomarkers in melanoma have been evaluated in tumor tissue samples by conventional morphology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) as well as DNA and RNA analyses. In the present review, we critically summarize main high-quality studies investigating IHC-based protein biomarkers of melanoma outcome according to Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)-derived criteria. Pathways have been classified and conveyed in the "biologic road" previously described by Hanahan and Weinberg. Data derived from genomic and transcriptomic technologies have been critically reviewed to better understand if any of investigated proteins or gene signatures should be incorporated into clinical practice or still remain a field of melanoma research. Despite a wide body of research, no molecular prognostic biomarker has yet been translated into clinical practice. Conventional tissue biomarkers, such as Breslow thickness, ulceration, mitotic rate and lymph node positivity, remain the backbone prognostic indicators in melanoma.
    Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin 02/2014; · 2.68 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
36 Downloads
Available from
Jun 5, 2014