Article

Listening to Older Adults: Elderly Patients' Experience of Care in Residency and Practicing Physician Outpatient Clinics

American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Impact Factor: 4.22). 05/2011; 59(5):909-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03370.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The population of people aged 65 and older is rapidly growing. Research has demonstrated significant quality gaps in the clinical care of older patients in the United States, especially in training programs. Little is known about how older patients' experience with care delivered in residency clinics compares with that delivered by practicing physicians. Using patient surveys from the American Board of Internal Medicine Care of the Vulnerable Elderly Practice Improvement Module, the quality of care provided to adults aged 65 and older by 52 internal medicine and family medicine residency clinics and by a group of 144 practicing physicians was studied. The residency clinics received 2,213 patient surveys, and the practicing physicians received 4,204. Controlling for age and overall health status, patients from the residency clinic sample were less likely to report receiving guidance and interventions for important aspects of care for older adults than patients from the practicing physician sample. The largest difference was observed in providing ways to help patients prevent falls or treat problems with balance or walking (42.1% vs 61.8%, P<.001). Patients from the residency clinic sample were less likely to rate their overall care as high (77.5% vs 88.8%, P<.001). Patient surveys reveal important deficiencies in processes of care that are more pronounced for patients cared for in residency clinics. Quality of patient experience and communication are vital aspects of overall quality of care, especially for older adults. Physician education at all levels, faculty development, and practice system redesign are needed to ensure that the care needs of older adults are met.

2 Followers
 · 
157 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transition from hospitalization to post-discharge care is a vulnerable period for patients. How the experience of this transition differs for patients with resident primary care physicians is unknown. In a single, large academic primary care practice, we examined an inception cohort of consecutive hospitalizations and post-discharge visits of hospitalized patients with resident or faculty primary care physicians between 2008 and 2013. We compared patient demographics, readmission risk, and access to outpatient care between resident and faculty primary care physicians, using generalized estimating equations to account for repeated hospitalizations. We documented 8161 hospitalizations among patients with resident primary care physicians and 20844 for faculty primary care physicians. Hospitalized patients with resident primary care physicians were generally younger, more likely to be on Medicaid, and more likely to be African-American (p<0.001). Patients with resident primary care physicians were less likely to be seen within 7 and 30 days of discharge (adjusted relative risks 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81-0.93 at 7 days, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.92 at 30 days), and had an increased risk of readmission within 30 days (adjusted odds ratio 1.25 95% CI,1.13-1.37). They were also considerably less likely to see their own provider at first follow-up (relative risk 0.55; 95% CI, 0.52-0.59). Hospitalized patients with resident primary care physicians had lower rates of timely post-discharge follow up, higher rates of readmission, and a lower likelihood of seeing their own provider than did patients with faculty primary care physicians. These findings highlight the challenges facing academic centers for patients with resident primary care physicians.
    The American journal of medicine 04/2014; 127(9). DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.03.038 · 5.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evidence-based practice in education requires high-quality evidence, and many in the medical education community have called for an improvement in the methodological quality of education research. Our aim was to use a valid measure of medical education research quality to highlight the methodological quality of research publications and provide an overview of the recent internal medicine (IM) residency literature. We searched MEDLINE and PreMEDLINE to identify English-language articles published in the United States and Canada between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011, focusing on IM residency education. Study quality was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI), which has demonstrated reliability and validity. Qualitative articles were excluded. Articles were ranked by quality score, and the top 25% were examined for common themes, and 2 articles within each theme were selected for in-depth presentation. The search identified 731 abstracts of which 223 articles met our inclusion criteria. The mean (±SD) MERSQI score of the 223 studies included in the review was 11.07 (±2.48). Quality scores were highest for data analysis (2.70) and lowest for study design (1.41) and validity (1.29). The themes identified included resident well-being, duty hours and resident workload, career decisions and gender, simulation medicine, and patient-centered outcomes. Our review provides an overview of the IM medical education literature for 2010-2011, highlighting 5 themes of interest to the medical education community. Study design and validity are 2 areas where improvements in methodological quality are needed, and authors should consider these when designing research protocols.
    06/2013; 5(2):203-210. DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-12-00238.1
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Quality improvement (QI) initiatives are critical in the care of older adults who are more vulnerable to substandard care. QI education meets aspects of core Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education competencies and prepares learners for the rising focus on performance measurement in health care. The authors developed, implemented, and evaluated a QI curriculum for geriatrics fellows. The evidence-based curriculum included didactics and a fellow-led QI intervention based on audit and feedback through the Practice Improvement Module in Care of the Vulnerable Elderly. QI knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors were assessed before and after the improvement project. Fellows' knowledge of QI improved (p = .0156), but behavior did not change significantly across a short-term improvement project. A structured focus group with fellows revealed themes of accountability and the importance of interprofessional teamwork in QI. QI education for geriatrics fellows can be feasible, well received, and prepare future physician leaders for patient-centered care, performance measurement, and effecting systems change.
    Gerontology & geriatrics education 06/2013; DOI:10.1080/02701960.2013.815179