CT-guided Radiofrequency Ablation as a Salvage Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Hepatic Metastases Developing after Hepatectomy

Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10065, USA.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR (Impact Factor: 2.41). 06/2011; 22(6):755-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.01.451
Source: PubMed


To evaluate the clinical outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLMs) that recur after hepatectomy.
From December 2002 to December 2008, 71 CLMs that developed after hepatectomy were ablated in 56 patients. Medical records and imaging were reviewed to determine technique effectiveness/complete ablation (ie, ablation defect covering the entire tumor on 4-6-week postablation computed tomography [CT]), complications, and local tumor progression (LTP) at the site of ablation. LTP-free and overall survival were calculated by using Kaplan-Meier methodology. A modified clinical risk score (CRS) including nodal status of the primary tumor, time interval between diagnoses of the primary tumor and liver metastases, number of tumors, and size of the largest tumor was assessed for its effect on overall survival and LTP.
Tumor size ranged between 0.5 and 5.7 cm. Complete ablation was documented in 67 of 71 cases (94%). Complications included liver abscess (n = 1) and pleural effusion (n = 1). Median overall survival time was 31 months. One-, 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were 91%, 66%, and 41%, respectively. CRS was an independent factor for overall survival (74% for CRS of 0-2 vs 42% for CRS of 3-4 at 2 y; P = .03) and for LTP-free survival (66% for CRS of 0-2 vs 22% for CRS of 3-4 at 1 y after a single ablation; P <.01).
CT-guided RF ablation can be used to treat recurrent CLM after hepatectomy. A low CRS is associated with better clinical outcomes.

Download full-text


Available from: William Alago, Mar 27, 2014
43 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of our study was to evaluate the feasibility rate and the reasons for infeasibility of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) at planning sonography. We retrospectively evaluated 248 patients who had been referred for planning sonography at our department between October 2005 and February 2006. We reviewed the radiologic reports of 256 planning sonography examinations in terms of the rate of feasible cases and the reasons for infeasibility. The reasons for infeasibility were classified in six categories: an inconspicuous tumor, an inadequate electrode path, an organ vulnerable to collateral thermal damage, a tumor that was too large or too many tumors, and a high risk of the heat sink effect. In addition, we assessed the treatment modality for the patients who were determined to have HCCs for which percutaneous radiofrequency ablation was not feasible. In 141 (55%) of the 256 planning sonography examinations, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation was feasible. The remaining 115 (45%) planning sonography examinations revealed that radiofrequency ablation was not a feasible procedure. The reasons for infeasibility included an inconspicuous tumor in 77 patients (55.8%), an inadequate electrode path in 33 patients (23.9%), an organ vulnerable to collateral thermal damage in 14 patients (10.1%), a tumor that was too large or too many tumors in eight patients (5.8%), a high risk of the heat sink effect in five patients (3.6%), and a portal vein thrombosis in one patient (0.7%). One reason for infeasibility was found in 96 patients, two reasons in 19 patients, and four reasons in one patient. Seventy (61.9%) of 113 patients for whom radiofrequency ablation was not feasible underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization as an alternative treatment. In approximately half of the patients for whom percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of HCC is requested, the procedure is not feasible, mainly due to inconspicuous tumors, at planning sonography. Additional objective criteria for assessing the feasibility of radiofrequency ablation and therapeutic strategies according to the reasons for infeasibility should be investigated further.
    American Journal of Roentgenology 06/2008; 190(5):1324-30. DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2970 · 2.73 Impact Factor

  • Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 02/2012; 23(2):153-63. DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2011.12.003 · 2.41 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the relationship between the minimal margin size and local tumor progression (LTP) following CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM). METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, HIPPA-compliant review identified 73 patients with 94 previously untreated CLM that underwent RFA between March 2003 and May 2010, resulting in an ablation zone completely covering the tumor 4-8 weeks after RFA dynamic CT. Comparing the pre- with the post-RFA CT, the minimal margin size was categorized to 0, 1-5, 6-10, and 11-15 mm. Follow-up included CT every 2-4 months. Kaplan-Meier methodology and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the effect of the minimal margin size, tumor location, size, and proximity to a vessel on LTP. RESULTS: Forty-five of 94 (47.9 %) CLM progressed locally. Median LTP-free survival (LPFS) was 16 months. Two-year LPFS rates for ablated CLM with minimal margin of 0, 1-5 mm, 6-10 mm, 11-15 mm were 26, 46, 74, and 80 % (p < 0.011). Minimal margin (p = 0.002) and tumor size (p = 0.028) were independent risk factors for LTP. The risk for LTP decreased by 46 % for each 5-mm increase in minimal margin size, whereas each additional 5-mm increase in tumor size increased the risk of LTP by 22 %. CONCLUSIONS: An ablation zone with a minimal margin uniformly larger than 5 mm 4-8 weeks postablation CT is associated with the best local tumor control.
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 04/2012; 36(1). DOI:10.1007/s00270-012-0377-1 · 2.07 Impact Factor
Show more