The Pittsburgh STOP Program: Disseminating an Evidence-Informed Intervention for Low-Income Pregnant Smokers

Western Psychiatric Institute & Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
American journal of health promotion: AJHP (Impact Factor: 2.37). 04/2011; 25(5 Suppl):S75-81. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.100616-QUAN-197
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Prenatal smoking is a preventable risk factor for poor perinatal outcomes and is more prevalent in pregnant smokers of low socioeconomic status (SES). We describe the intervention model and factors associated with quitting from the Pittsburgh STOP Program, an evidence-informed dissemination intervention for low-SES pregnant smokers.
STOP is delivered in community health care clinics serving economically disadvantaged women.
Participants were 856 pregnant women who were current smokers (93%) and recent quitters (7%). Most were white (59%) or black (35%), single (74%), young (mean age = 25), and experiencing an unplanned pregnancy (84%); 90% were insured by Medicaid/uninsured.
An evidence-informed intervention for community pregnant women was delivered individually in a single-group pre-post evaluation design. Measures were demographics, participation and retention, smoking status, satisfaction, and cost. Analyses included descriptive statistics and logistic regression.
Participants attended an average of 4.7 sessions. Dropout rate after the first session was 5%. Over 11% of smokers quit; 48% of preenrollment spontaneous quitters remained abstinent. Factors significantly associated with quitting included race, mother's age, nicotine dependence, and number of sessions attended.
STOP is a community program with self-selected participants and no control group.
Low-income pregnant smokers will engage in an evidence-informed cessation program tailored for this group, with quit rates that compare to controlled research results.

  • Source
    • ". ' Gifts ' , ' gift voucher ' or ' lottery prize ' Walsh et al . , 1997 ; Albrecht et al . , 1998 ; Lillington et al . , 1995 ; Edwards et al . , 2009 ; Cluss et al . , 2011 ; McBride et al . , 2004 ; Ripley - Moffitt et al . , 2008 ; Dungy et al . , 1992 ; Cohen and Mrtek , 1994 ; Reeves Tuttle and Dewey , 1995 ; Wright et al . , 2012 Baby items Nappies , bottles , wipes , powder , baby bibs / clothes , sipper cups , car seat , stroller , infant health kit , toys Gulliver et al . , 2004 ; Edwards et al . ,"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Financial or tangible incentives are a strategy for improving health behaviours. The mechanisms of action of incentives are complex and debated. Using a multidisciplinary integrated mixed methods study, with service-user collaboration throughout, we developed a typology of incentives and their meanings for initiating and sustaining smoking cessation in pregnancy and breastfeeding. The ultimate aim was to inform incentive intervention design by providing insights into incentive acceptability and mechanisms of action.
    Social Science & Medicine 12/2014; 128C:10-17. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.019 · 2.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Several studies suggest that smoking cessation dissipates after birth and that the majority of women resume smoking (e.g., Carmichael and Ahluwalia, 2000; Colman and Joyce, 2003; Fingerhut et al., 1990; Kahn et al., 2002; McBride et al., 1992; McBride and Pirie, 1990; Mullen et al., 1997; O'Campo et al., 1992; Pollak et al., 1997; Tong et al., 2009). For example, Tong and colleagues (2009) recently found that, on average, 53% of women who had quit and were not smoking during their pregnancy resumed smoking at four months post delivery at sites in thirty-one states in the U.S. Clinical investigations with women of lower socioeconomic status also suggest that approximately half of women who quit during pregnancy resume smoking within one year after giving birth (e.g., Cluss et al., 2011). Additionally, this research has identified a number of variables that influence smoking relapse during pregnancy and following birth. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although pregnancy is often viewed as a unique opportunity to engage women in positive health changes, including smoking cessation, it is not clear whether, or to what extent, smoking cessation initiated during pregnancy persists long term after pregnancy. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relation between smoking cessation during pregnancy and smoking status three years later. Data were drawn from the National Epidemiologic Survey of Alcohol and Relation Conditions (NESARC), a nationally representative sample of over 40,000 adults in the United States. Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the relation between smoking cessation during pregnancy and odds of smoking three years later. Smoking status at follow-up of women who continued smoking during pregnancy and women who never smoked was also examined. Analyses controlled for demographic differences. Smoking cessation during pregnancy was not significantly related to smoking status three years later. However, continued smoking during pregnancy was associated with significantly increased odds of smoking three years later, compared to smokers who were not pregnant at baseline. Among non-smokers, pregnancy at baseline was associated with a significantly decreased likelihood of smoking three years later, compared to women who were not pregnant at baseline. The present study uniquely extends previous research on smoking cessation during and following pregnancy. The results call for increased efforts to develop interventions that help new mothers develop and maintain abstinence from smoking.
    Drug and alcohol dependence 11/2011; 123(1-3):110-4. DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.10.024 · 3.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Smoking rates are three times as high for pregnant Indigenous women relative to non-Indigenous women, in Australia. This paper describes Indigenous women's self-reported antenatal smoking behaviour and compares knowledge and attitudes of those who: (i) smoke and don't smoke during pregnancy; and (ii) quit or continued to smoke since the beginning of pregnancy. Cross-sectional surveys with 264 pregnant Indigenous women in two states collected data on smoking status, antenatal changes, risk knowledge, attitudes to smoking and sociodemographic characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed associations between knowledge and attitude variables and smoking status and antenatal changes in smoking status. Forty-six per cent of the women (n = 121) reported currently smoking. The majority (68%) who smoked at the beginning of pregnancy reported quitting (21%) or reducing (47%). Relative to smokers, non-smokers had more schooling (P = 0.002), more post-secondary education (P = 0.023), lower parity (P = 0.003), better understanding of smoking-related risks (miscarriage P = 0.01; low birth weight P = 0.003; infant illness P < 0.001; childhood behavioural problems P = 0.007), and less frequently expressed attitudes indicating that quitting was very difficult given other problems they faced. Similar patterns were found for women who quit during pregnancy compared to those who continued smoking. Increasing awareness of antenatal smoking risks and the benefits of quitting may motivate women to attempt to quit. However, knowledge alone is unlikely to be sufficient considering the life circumstances of many Indigenous women. Addressing the social environment and daily stressors, particularly those exacerbated by pregnancy, may be critical to supporting quit attempts.
    Drug and Alcohol Review 04/2012; 31(5):608-16. DOI:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00448.x · 1.55 Impact Factor
Show more


Available from