Article

Attitudes and beliefs of parents concerned about vaccines: impact of timing of immunization information.

National Vaccine Program Office, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA.
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.3). 05/2011; 127 Suppl 1:S120-6. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-1722R
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine if giving vaccine-information materials before the 2-month vaccination visit to mothers with concerns about vaccine safety positively changed their attitudes and beliefs about vaccine safety.
Mothers who indicated concerns about infant vaccinations were recruited from 2 separate sites in Tennessee and California and were given vaccine information at 1 of 3 times: during a prenatal visit; a 1-week postpartum well-child visit; or a 2-month vaccination visit. A separate group of concerned mothers was assigned to be followed longitudinally at all 3 time points and was analyzed separately. The mothers reviewed a new vaccine-information pamphlet and Vaccine Information Statements (VIS) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Attitudes and beliefs about immunization were assessed both before and after the review of materials with written surveys.
A total of 272 mothers with immunization concerns participated in the study. After review of the materials, mothers in all groups were significantly more likely to respond positively to questions and statements supporting the safety and importance of vaccines. Mothers who received this information at earlier visits were not significantly more likely to respond positively than mothers who received the information at the child's 2-month vaccination visit; however, participating mothers did indicate a preference for receiving vaccine information before the first vaccination visit.
Distribution of the vaccine-information pamphlet and Vaccine Information Statements significantly improved attitudes about vaccination regardless of at what visit they were provided. Allowing adequate time to review vaccine information, even if done at the vaccination visit, may benefit concerned mothers.

0 Followers
 · 
115 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A suboptimal level of seasonal influenza vaccination among pregnant minority women is an intractable public health problem, requiring effective message resonance with this population. We evaluated the effects of randomized exposure to messages which emphasize positive outcomes of vaccination ("gain-frame"), or messages which emphasize negative outcomes of forgoing vaccination ("loss-frame"). We also assessed multilevel social and community factors that influence maternal immunization among racially and ethnically diverse populations. Minority pregnant women in metropolitan Atlanta were enrolled in the longitudinal study and randomized to receive intervention or control messages. A postpartum questionnaire administered 30 days postpartum evaluated immunization outcomes following baseline message exposure among the study population. We evaluated key outcomes using bivariate and multivariate analyses. Neither gain- [OR=0.5176, (95% CI: 0.203,1.322)] nor loss-framed [OR=0.5000, 95% CI: (0.192,1.304)] messages were significantly associated with increased likelihood of immunization during pregnancy. Significant correlates of seasonal influenza immunization during pregnancy included healthcare provider recommendation [OR=3.934, 95% CI: (1.331,11.627)], use of hospital-based practices as primary source of prenatal care [OR=2.584, 95% CI: (1.091,6.122)], and perceived interpersonal support for influenza immunization [OR=3.405, 95% CI: (1.412,8.212)]. Dissemination of vaccine education messages via healthcare providers, and cultivating support from social networks, will improve seasonal influenza immunization among pregnant minority women.
    Vaccine 01/2014; 32(15). DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.030 · 3.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: We examined pregnant women's likelihood of vaccinating their infants against seasonal influenza via a randomized message framing study. Using Prospect Theory, we tested gain- and loss-frame message effects and demographic and psychosocial correlates of influenza immunization intention. We also explored interactions among pregnant women who viewed "Contagion" to understand cultural influences on message perception. Results: The study population (n = 261) included many lower income (≤ $20 000/yearly household earnings) pregnant participants (69.2%, n = 171) inclusive of Black/African Americans (88.5%, n = 230), Hispanic/Latinas (7.3%, n = 19), and Other/Multicultural women (4.2%, n = 11). Both gain [OR = 2.13, 90% CI: (1.120, 4.048)] and loss-frame messages [OR = 2.02, 90% CI: (1.083, 3.787)] were significantly associated with infant influenza vaccination intention compared with the control condition. Intention to immunize against influenza during pregnancy had a strong effect on intent to immunize infants [OR = 10.83, 90%CI: (4.923, 23.825)]. Those who had seen the feature film "Contagion" (n = 54, 20.69%) viewed gain- and loss-framed messages as appealing (x (2) = 6.03, p = 0.05), novel (x (2) = 6.24, p = 0.03), and easy to remember (x (2) = 16.33, p = 0.0003). Conclusions: In this population, both gain- and loss-framed messages were positively associated with increased maternal intent to immunize infants against influenza. Message resonance was enhanced among those who saw the film "Contagion." Additionally, history of immunization was strongly associated with infant immunization intention. Methods: Pregnant women ages 18-50 participated in a randomized message framing study from September 2011 through May 2012 that included exposure to intervention or control messages, coupled with questionnaire completion. Venue-based sampling was used to recruit racial and ethnic minority female participants at locations throughout Atlanta, Georgia. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate key outcomes.
    Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 10/2013; 9(12). DOI:10.4161/hv.26993 · 3.64 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Context: This study examines trends in state-level childhood vaccine policy in the United States from 1998-2012, explaining trajectories for both vaccine-critical and pro-immunization legislative efforts. Successful mobilization by vaccine critics during the height of the autism and thimerosal scares (roughly 1998-2003) yielded a few state-level expansions for the most permissive type of exemption from vaccine mandates for public school attendance, those based on personal belief. However, vaccine-critical positions have largely become discredited. How has vaccine critics’ ability to advance preferred policies and prevent the passage of unfavorable legislation changed over time? Methods: We created a unique dataset of childhood vaccine bills (n=636) introduced from 1998 to 2012 across the 50 state legislatures and coded them by type of effort (exemption, mandate, mercury ban, and information policies) and outcome. We then map out the trends in vaccine policies over time. In order to contextualize trends we identified, we also reviewed numerous primary sources and conducted stakeholder interviews. Findings: Broadly, we find that vaccine critics’ legislative success has begun to wane. There were only 20 bills in our dataset in which vaccine critics were able to affirmatively change policy in their preferred direction via the legislative process. Only five of those wins were significant (such as obtaining a new philosophical exemption to vaccine mandates), and the last of these occurred in 2007. Critics were more successful at preventing passage of pro-immunization legislation, such as mandates for the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Conclusions: Recent legislation in California, Oregon, and Washington tightening philosophical exemptions with informational requirements suggests that vaccine politics may be entering another phase – one in which immunization supporters may be able to counter increasing opt-out rates, particularly in states with recent outbreaks and politicians who favor science-based policies.
    Milbank Quarterly 12/2014; DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.12075 · 5.06 Impact Factor