Article

Parents' Attitudes Toward Pediatric Genetic Testing for Common Disease Risk

Division of Health Outcomes and Health Behaviors, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven St, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.3). 05/2011; 127(5):e1288-95. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-0938
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe parents' attitudes toward pediatric genetic testing for common, adult-onset health conditions and to identify factors underlying these attitudes.
Parents (n = 219) enrolled in a large, group-practice health plan were offered a "multiplex" genetic test for susceptibility to 8 common, adult-onset health conditions and completed an online survey assessing attitudes and beliefs about the risks and benefits of the test for their child, their willingness to consider having their child tested, and other psychosocial variables.
Parents viewed the benefits of pediatric testing to outweigh its risks (positive decisional balance) and were moderately interested in pediatric testing. Variables associated with positive decisional balance included greater interest in knowing about gene-health associations in their child, anticipation of less difficulty understanding their child's genetic health risks, and more positive emotional reactions to learning about their child's decreased health risks (adjusted R(2) = 0.33, P < .0001). Similarly, variables associated with greater parental willingness to test were being a mother (versus being a father), greater perceived risk of diseases in their child, greater interest in knowing about gene-health relationships in their child, anticipating less difficulty learning about their child's genetic health risks, anticipating more positive emotional reactions to learning about their child's decreased health risks, and positive decisional balance (adjusted R(2) = 0.57, P < .0001).
As genetic susceptibility testing for common, adult-onset health conditions proliferates, pediatricians should anticipate parents' interest in testing children and be prepared to facilitate informed decision making about such testing.

0 Followers
 · 
141 Views
  • Source
    • "A few interventions trials (Peshkin, DeMarco, & Tercyak, 2010) have evaluated best practices for assisting minors to understand the implications of parents' predictive genetic test results and increase adaptive coping in response to this information (e.g., promoting beliefs and behaviors to optimally manage risk). Although parental attitudes toward genetic susceptibility testing of minors for cancer are generally favorable and minors are undergoing testing (Howard, Avard, & Borry, 2011; Taber et al., 2010), it is unknown whether such testing prompts preventive behaviors such as avoidance of sun exposure and tobacco use, as well as energy balance behaviors (e.g., weight control and physical activity). Thus, the arena of communication between parents and minor children presents a wide-open landscape for psychologist-led health behavior research. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The past decade has witnessed rapid advances in human genome sequencing technology and in the understanding of the role of genetic and epigenetic alterations in cancer development. These advances have raised hopes that such knowledge could lead to improvements in behavioral risk reduction interventions, tailored screening recommendations, and treatment matching that together could accelerate the war on cancer. Despite this optimism, translation of genomic discovery for clinical and public health applications has moved relatively slowly. To date, health psychologists and the behavioral sciences generally have played a very limited role in translation research. In this report we discuss what we mean by genomic translational research and consider the social forces that have slowed translational research, including normative assumptions that translation research must occur downstream of basic science, thus relegating health psychology and other behavioral sciences to a distal role. We then outline two broad priority areas in cancer prevention, detection, and treatment where evidence will be needed to guide evaluation and implementation of personalized genomics: (a) effective communication, to broaden dissemination of genomic discovery, including patient-provider communication and familial communication, and (b) the need to improve the motivational impact of behavior change interventions, including those aimed at altering lifestyle choices and those focusing on decision making regarding targeted cancer treatments and chemopreventive adherence. We further discuss the role that health psychologists can play in interdisciplinary teams to shape translational research priorities and to evaluate the utility of emerging genomic discoveries for cancer prevention and control. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
    American Psychologist 02/2015; 70(2):91-104. DOI:10.1037/a0036568 · 6.87 Impact Factor
    • "While attitudes toward genetic testing among parents of children with CHD remain unknown, surveys of general public's attitudes about genetic testing conducted in the U.S. and abroad [Molster et al., 2009; Rose et al., 2005a; Rose et al., 2005b; Wang et al., 2001] have, in general, found favorable attitudes with some concern about insurance discrimination. Additionally, parents generally have a positive attitude towards and interest in genetic testing for childhood [Brunger et al., 2000; Patenaude et al., 1996] and adult onset conditions [Campbell and Ross, 2005; Tercyak et al., 2011]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clinical genetic testing for specific isolated congenital heart defects (CHD) is becoming standard of care in pediatric cardiology practice. Both genetic knowledge and attitudes toward genetic testing are associated with an increased utilization of genetic testing, but these factors have not been evaluated in parents of children with CHD. We mailed a survey to measure the demographics, genetic knowledge, and attitudes towards genetic testing of parents of children with CHD who previously consented to participate in a separate research study of the genetic etiology of left ventricular outflow tract malformations (LVOT). Of the 378 eligible families, 190 (50%) returned surveys with both parents completing surveys in 97 (51%) families, resulting in 287 participants. Genetic knowledge was assessed on an adapted measure on which the mean percent correct was 73.8%. Educational attainment and household income were directly and significantly associated with genetic knowledge (P < 0.001). Attitudes about the health effects of genetic testing were favorable with at least 57% agreeing that genetic testing would be used for managing health care and finding cures for disease. Conversely, a minority of participants found it likely that genetic testing would be used for insurance (up to 39.9%), employment (15.8%), or racial/social discrimination (up to 11.2%). Parents of younger children were less likely to endorse employment or racial/social discrimination. Genetic knowledge was not correlated with specific attitudes. Among parents of children with CHD, genetic knowledge was directly associated with household income and education, but additional research is necessary to determine what factors influence attitudes towards genetic testing. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 12/2014; 164(12). DOI:10.1002/ajmg.a.36763 · 2.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Genetic testing offered by direct-to-consumer companies-herein referred to as "predictive genomic testing"--has come under federal scrutiny. Critics claim testing yields uninterpretable and potentially harmful information. Supporters assert individuals have a right to this information, which could catalyze preventive health actions. Despite contentions that predictive genomic testing is a tool of primary disease prevention, little discussion has focused on its use with children. This partly stems from concerns expressed in existing professional guidelines about the potential for psychological and behavioral harm to children engendered by predictive genetic tests for Mendelian diseases. Conducting research to understand the actual benefits and harms is important for policy development and practice guidance and can be ethically justified within the pediatric regulatory framework of research that offers a prospect of direct benefit. Child health psychologists are well poised to contribute to this research effort, and promote the translation of genomic discoveries to improve pediatric medicine.
    Journal of Pediatric Psychology 08/2011; 36(10):1113-21. DOI:10.1093/jpepsy/jsr040 · 2.91 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview

Download
2 Downloads
Available from