Article

ECT efficacy and treatment course: a systematic review and meta-analysis of twice vs thrice weekly schedules. J Affect Disord

Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Australia.
Journal of Affective Disorders (Impact Factor: 3.71). 04/2011; 138(1-2):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.039
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) guidelines, across various regulatory bodies, lack consensus as to the optimal frequency of treatment for individual patients. Some authors postulate that twice weekly ECT may have a similar efficacy to thrice weekly, and may have a lower risk of adverse cognitive outcomes. We did a systematic review and a meta-analysis to assess the strength of associations between ECT frequency and depression scores, duration of treatment, number of ECTs, and remission rates.
We searched on Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (to December 2009), and searched reports to identify comparative studies of frequency of ECT. We did both random-effects (RE) and quality effect (QE) meta-analyses to determine the risk of various outcomes associated with lesser frequency as compared to the thrice weekly frequency.
We analysed 8 datasets (7 articles), including 214 subjects. Twice-weekly frequency of ECT was associated with a similar change in depression score (QE model SMD -0.11 [-0.55-0.33] and RE model SMD -0.17 [-0.77-0.43]) as compared to thrice weekly ECT. The number of real ECT's trended towards fewer in the twice weekly group. There was a statistically significant longer duration of treatment with a twice weekly protocol (QE model 6.48 days [4.99-7.97] and RE model 4.78 days [0.74-8.82]). There was a statistically significant greater efficacy for thrice weekly ECT compared to once weekly ECT (QE model SMD 1.25 [-0.62-1.9] and RE model SMD 1.31 [0.6-2.02]).
Twice weekly ECT is associated with similar efficacy to thrice weekly ECT, may require fewer treatments and may be associated with longer treatment duration when compared to thrice weekly. These epidemiological observations support the routine use of twice weekly ECT in acute courses, though choice of frequency should take into account individual patient factors. These observations have implications for resource utilisation e.g. costs of duration of admission vs cost of provision of ECT, as well as issues of access to inpatient beds and anaesthetist time.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Fiona J Charlson, Oct 29, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
129 Views
 · 
46 Downloads
  • Source
    • "When it comes to frequency of ECT there is no significant difference between once, twice or thrice a week but the response might be faster for thrice a week. The trend suggests that twice a week might be the best compromise for elective cases and thrice a week for urgent cases [28]. The evidence suggests that higher electric dose relative to the individual seizure threshold is needed for unilateral lead placement compared to bilateral lead placement. "
    Electroconvulsive Therapy: Clinical Uses, Efficacy and Long-Term Health Effects, Edited by Kathleen Braddock, 08/2014: chapter An Evidence-Informed Model for the Modern Practice of Electroconvulsive Therapy; NOVA scientific publisher., ISBN: 978-1-63463-038-2
  • Source
    • "Early studies suggested that more frequent administration of ECT may be associated with a more rapid response, but at the cost of greater cognitive impairment (Shapira et al. 1991). A recent review (Charlson et al. 2011) found that ECT given twice weekly had similar efficacy to ECT given three times a week, and twice weekly ECT could result in fewer treatments being required. ECT given only once a week was less effective than ECT given three times a week. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to be an effective treatment for depression. However, there has been little research to determine optimal parameters for treatment. This study compared two rTMS treatment regimes for the treatment of major depression. Seventy-seven participants were randomized to either spaced or daily treatment. Spaced rTMS was given 3 days/week for 6 weeks (18 treatments in total) and daily rTMS was given 5 days/week for 4 weeks (20 treatments in total). All participants were assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. Participants in the spaced treatment group were also assessed after 6 weeks of treatment. All participants were treated at 110% of the resting motor threshold with high-frequency rTMS (10 Hz) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) followed by low-frequency rTMS to the right DLPFC. Participants in the daily treatment group showed more improvement by week 4 than those in the spaced treatment group; however, both groups had similar improvement by treatment completion. There was significant improvement in both groups in ratings of depression and anxiety, with no significant differences between groups. Our study indicates that the efficacy of rTMS is related to the number of treatments given and that spacing the treatments neither improves nor reduces efficacy.
    Psychological Medicine 09/2011; 42(5):981-8. DOI:10.1017/S0033291711001760 · 5.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increasing demand on electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) services led to a recommendation that low risk patients be considered for twice weekly ECT rather than the usual thrice weekly. We evaluated whether practice changed and compared patient clinical outcomes for twice and thrice weekly ECT. Medical records for all patients receiving ECT in the 2 years study period (1/9/08 to 30/8/10) were reviewed to determine ECT protocol, diagnosis, admission duration and readmission rates. Hundred and nineteen patients received 150 treatment courses during the study period. Patient outcomes were compared for twice weekly ECT and thrice weekly ECT protocols, as well as for 1 year before and after the recommendation (1/9/09). Twice weekly ECT courses increased (8-20) after the recommendation while thrice weekly ECT courses decreased (64-30) (p=0.000). The recommendation had no significant effect on patient outcomes. Comparing twice and thrice weekly ECT, patient clinical outcomes were similar between the two groups, though non-affective twice weekly patients waited longer before starting ECT. In the context of resource constraints, psychiatrists can be influenced to examine and change their ECT prescribing practice. This bodes well for the implementation of evidence based treatment into mental health services. Secondly, for adults, there appears to be no significant differences in clinical outcomes for twice versus thrice weekly ECT.
    Psychiatry Research 04/2012; 199(3). DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.03.020 · 2.68 Impact Factor
Show more