Informed Citizen and Empowered Citizen in Health: Results from a European Survey

Institute of Electronics Engineering and Telematics of Aveiro, Department of Economics, Management and Industrial Engineering, University of Aveiro, Portugal.
BMC Family Practice (Impact Factor: 1.67). 04/2011; 12(20):20. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-20
Source: PubMed


The knowledge about the relationship between health-related activities on the Internet (i.e. informed citizens) and individuals' control over their own experiences of health or illness (i.e. empowered citizens) is valuable but scarce. In this paper, we investigate the correlation between four ways of using the Internet for information on health or illness and citizens attitudes and behaviours toward health professionals and health systems and establish the profile of empowered eHealth citizens in Europe.
Data was collected during April and May 2007 (N = 7022), through computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI). Respondents from Denmark, Germany, Greece, Latvia, Norway, Poland and Portugal participated in the survey. The profiles were generated using logistic regressions and are based on: a) socio-demographic and health information, b) the level of use of health-related online services, c) the level of use of the Internet to get health information to decide whether to consult a health professional, prepare for a medical appointment and assess its outcome, and d) the impact of online health information on citizens' attitudes and behavior towards health professionals and health systems.
Citizens using the Internet to decide whether to consult a health professional or to get a second opinion are likely to be frequent visitors of health sites, active participants of online health forums and recurrent buyers of medicines and other health related products online, while only infrequent epatients, visiting doctors they have never met face-to-face. Participation in online health communities seems to be related with more inquisitive and autonomous patients.
The profiles of empowered eHealth citizens in Europe are situational and country dependent. The number of Europeans using the Internet to get health information to help them deal with a consultation is raising and having access to online health information seems to be associated with growing number of inquisitive and self-reliant patients. Doctors are increasingly likely to experience consultations with knowledgeable and empowered patients, who will challenge them in various ways.

Download full-text


Available from: Hans-Ulrich Prokosch,
  • Source
    • "Others regard the reasons as more societal by nature as patients are becoming more involved and active in their health-related affairs (cf. Santana et al., 2011). At the same time, health care provisioning has increased in complexity. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – Service alignment between health service provider and patient is changing. Instead of placing responsibilities into the hands of a provider, new forms of co-operation are emerging in which patients are regarded as a resource and a partner. In order to see this vision come to life, mechanisms that: first, support patient’s health decision making; and second, integrate matters of health into a wider ensemble that is health space; the overarching state of health-related affairs, are needed. In the following, these kinds of mechanisms are investigated and their applicability is discussed in relation to a national project. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – The work is exploratory and conceptual, focussing more on people than on technology. In the work, findings related to a concept of a health navigator; an artefact of personal health decision support, are assembled into a framework that bases on key sociological theories. The empirical elements focus on observations made on applicability of the concept, and the underlying framework of citizen-centric electronic health services. Findings – The authors argue that the discussed concept, when applied to personal health decision making according to the underlying framework, has a potential to change health service provisioning. In addition to stimulating new kind of co-operation between the health service provider and the citizen, the concept gives form to, somewhat idealized, notions of patient choice and empowerment. Research limitations/implications – The work described here is exploratory and forward-looking. Even though the concept and the framework are tested to a degree in a national project, more practice-oriented work is needed in terms of real-world applicability. It follows from this that the work is a conceptual elaboration on the future of personal health decision making. Originality/value – The findings, including the discussed challenges and needs, stem from real-world observations; from the needs of citizens. As such, they indicate a direction into which the development of personal health records and health decision support aids should go.
    Information Technology &amp People 11/2015; 28(4):790-805. DOI:10.1108/ITP-09-2014-0214 · 0.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In this context, eHealth is a common term that refers to " health services and information delivered or enhanced through the Internet and related technologies " [2]. Many eHealth tools exist and eHealth resources are widely used: Santana et al. identified that the Internet influences the way people handle a consultation as well as their behavior towards health professionals [3]. In 2009, 86% of U.S. physicians used the Internet to gather health, medical or drug information [4]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In general, eHealth services offer numerous advantages, yet they cannot tap their full potential if they do not fit to the intended users' needs. Therefore, this workshop aimed at identifying barriers and facilitators of eHealth usage of consumers. It followed the idea of a Future Workshop and included three key note talks from experts of different scientific disciplines.
  • Source
    • "who looked for Internet health information had had a discussion concerning the information with their doctors ( Ressi 2011 ; Bylund et al . 2007 ; Akerkar and Bichile 2004 ; Rainie and Fox 2000 ) . Compared to those who did not discuss their Internet health information , those who did have poorer health and rate the quality of information higher ( Santana et al . 2011 ; Bylund et al . 2007"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: E-patients 'empowered' by Web information are much more likely to participate in health care decision processes and take responsibility for their own health. The purpose of the study was to determine the influence of Internet use and online health information on the attitude, behavior, and emotions of Polish citizens aged 50+, with special regard to their attitude towards health professionals and the health care system. A total of 323 citizens, aged 50 years and above, who used the Internet for health purposes, were selected from the Polish population by random sampling. The sample collection was carried out by Polish opinion poll agencies in 2005, 2007, and 2012. The Internet was used by 27.8 % of Polish citizens aged 50+ for health purposes in the years 2005-2012. 69.7 % of respondents were looking for health information that might help them to deal with a consultation, 53.9 % turned to the Internet to prepare for a medical appointment, and 63.5 % to assess the outcome of a medical consultation and obtain a 'second opinion'. The most likely effects of health related use of the Internet were: willingness to change diet or other life-style habits (48 % of respondents) and making suggestions or queries on diagnosis or treatment by the doctor (46.1 %). Feelings of reassurance or relief after obtaining information on health or illness were reported by a similar number of respondents as feelings of anxiety and fear (31 % and 31.3 % respectively). Online health information can affect the attitudes, emotions, and health behaviors of Polish citizens aged 50+ in different ways.
    Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 05/2015; 861:1-17. DOI:10.1007/5584_2015_130 · 1.96 Impact Factor
Show more