Article

Rapid membrane protein topology prediction.

Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Center for Biomembrane Research, Swedish e-science Research Center, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bioinformatics (Impact Factor: 5.47). 05/2011; 27(9):1322-3. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr119
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT State-of-the-art methods for topology of α-helical membrane proteins are based on the use of time-consuming multiple sequence alignments obtained from PSI-BLAST or other sources. Here, we examine if it is possible to use the consensus of topology prediction methods that are based on single sequences to obtain a similar accuracy as the more accurate multiple sequence-based methods. Here, we show that TOPCONS-single performs better than any of the other topology prediction methods tested here, but ~6% worse than the best method that is utilizing multiple sequence alignments. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: TOPCONS-single is available as a web server from http://single.topcons.net/ and is also included for local installation from the web site. In addition, consensus-based topology predictions for the entire international protein index (IPI) is available from the web server and will be updated at regular intervals.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
77 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most integral membrane proteins, both in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, are co-translationally inserted into the membrane via Sec-type translocons: the SecYEG complex in prokaryotes and the Sec61 complex in eukaryotes. The contributions of individual amino acids to the overall free energy of membrane insertion of single transmembrane -helices have been measured for Sec61-mediated insertion into the endoplasmic reticular (ER) membrane (Nature 450:1026-1030), but have not been systematically determined for SecYEG-mediated insertion into the bacterial inner membrane. We now report such measurements, carried out in Escherichia coli. Overall, there is a good correlation between the results found for the mammalian ER and the E. coli inner membrane, but the hydrophobicity threshold for SecYEG-mediated insertion is distinctly lower than for Sec61-mediated insertion.
    Journal of Molecular Biology 05/2013; · 3.91 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Topology analysis of membrane proteins can be obtained by enzymatic shaving in combination with mass-spectrometry identification of peptides. Ideally, such analysis could provide quite detailed information about the membrane spanning regions. Here, we examine the ability of some shaving enzymes to provide large-scale analysis of membrane proteome topologies. To compare different shaving enzymes, we first analyzed the detected peptides from two over-expressed proteins. Secondly, we analyzed the peptides from non over-expressed Escherichia coli membrane proteins with known structure to evaluate the shaving methods. Finally, the identified peptides were used to test the accuracy of a number of topology predictors. At the end we suggest that the usage of thermolysin, an enzyme working at the natural pH of the cell for membrane shaving is superior because: (i) we detect a similar number of peptides and proteins using thermolysin and trypsin. (ii) Thermolysin shaving can be run at a natural pH and (iii) the incubation time is quite short. (iv) Fewer detected peptides from thermolysin shaving originate from the transmembrane regions. Using thermolysin shaving we can also provide a clear separation between the best and the less accurate topology predictors, indicating that using data from shaving can provide valuable information when developing new topology predictors.
    Proteomics 03/2013; · 4.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During the last two decades a large number of computational methods have been developed for predicting transmembrane protein topology. Current predictors rely on topogenic signals in the protein sequence, such as the distribution of positively charged residues in extra-membrane loops and the existence of N-terminal signals. However, phosphorylation and glycosylation are post-translational modifications (PTMs) that occur in a compartment-specific manner and therefore the presence of a phosphorylation or glycosylation site in a transmembrane protein provides topological information. We examine the combination of phosphorylation and glycosylation site prediction with transmembrane protein topology prediction. We report the development of a Hidden Markov Model based method, capable of predicting the topology of transmembrane proteins and the existence of kinase specific phosphorylation and N/O-linked glycosylation sites along the protein sequence. Our method integrates a novel feature in transmembrane protein topology prediction, which results in improved performance for topology prediction and reliable prediction of phosphorylation and glycosylation sites. The method is freely available at http://aias.biol.uoa.gr/HMMpTM.
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 11/2013; · 4.66 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
1 Download
Available from
Jun 10, 2014