Adherence to Guideline-Directed Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Among Medical and Surgical Inpatients at 33 Academic Medical Centers in the United States

University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
American Journal of Medical Quality (Impact Factor: 1.25). 05/2011; 26(3):174-80. DOI: 10.1177/1062860610382289
Source: PubMed


This study's purpose was to describe compliance with established venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis guidelines in medical and surgical inpatients at US academic medical centers (AMCs). Data were collected for a 2007 University HealthSystem Consortium Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolism (DVT/PE) Benchmarking Project that explored VTE in AMCs. Prophylaxis was considered appropriate based on 2004 American College of Chest Physicians guidelines. A total of 33 AMCs from 30 states participated. In all, 48% of patients received guideline-directed prophylaxis-59% were medical and 41% were surgical patients. VTE history was more common among medical patients with guideline-directed prophylaxis. Surgical patients admitted from the emergency department and with higher illness severity were more likely to receive appropriate prophylaxis. Despite guidelines, VTE prophylaxis remains underutilized in these US AMCs, particularly among surgical patients. Because AMCs provide the majority of physician training and should reflect and set care standards, this appears to be an opportunity for practice and quality improvement and for education.


Available from: Anneliese M Schleyer
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Real-life data on post-discharge venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis practices and treatments are lacking. We assessed post-operative VTE prophylaxis prescribed and received in a prospective registry, compared with the 2004 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines in high-risk orthopaedic surgery patients. Consecutive patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), hip fracture surgery (HFS), or knee arthroplasty (KA) were enrolled at discharge from 161 centres in 17 European countries if they had received in-hospital VTE prophylaxis that was considered in accordance with the ACCP guidelines by the treating physician. Data on prescribed and actual prophylaxis were obtained from hospital charts and patient post-discharge diaries. Post-operative prophylaxis prescribed and actual prophylaxis received were considered adherent or adequate, respectively, if recommended therapies were used for ≥28 days (HFS and THA) or ≥10 days (KA). Among 4,388 patients, 69.9% were prescribed ACCP-adherent VTE prophylaxis (THA: 1,411/2,217 [63.6%]; HFS: 701/1,112 [63.0%]; KA: 955/1,059 [90.2%]). Actual prophylaxis received was described in 3,939 patients with an available diary after discharge (non-evaluability rate of 10%). Mean actual durations of pharmacological prophylaxis from surgery were: 28.4 ± 13.7 (THA), 29.3 ± 13.9 (HFS), and 28.7 ± 14.1 days (KA). ACCP-adequate VTE prophylaxis was received by 66.5% of patients (60.9% THA, 55.4% HFS, and 88.7% KA). Prophylaxis inadequacies were mainly due to inadequate prescription, non-recommended prophylaxis prescription at discharge, or too short prophylaxis prescribed. In high-risk orthopaedic surgery patients with hospital-initiated prophylaxis, there is a gap between ACCP recommendations, prescribed and actual prophylaxis received, mainly due to inadequate prescription at discharge.
    Thrombosis and Haemostasis 12/2011; 107(2):270-9. DOI:10.1160/TH11-07-0463 · 4.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Observational studies continue to report thromboprophylaxis underuse for postoperative pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis (pPE/DVT) despite the long-standing existence of prevention guidelines. However, data are limited on whether thromboprophylaxis use differs between patients developing pPE/DVT versus those who do not or on why prophylaxis is withheld. Administrative data (2002-2007) from 28 Veterans Health Administration hospitals were screened for discharges with (1) pPE/DVT as flagged by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicator software and (2) pharmacoprophylaxis-recommended procedures, and the medical records were reviewed to ascertain true pPE/DVT cases. Controls were selected by matching cases by hospital, age, sex, diagnosis-related group, and predicted probability for developing pPE/DVT, and who underwent a pharmacoprophylaxis-recommended procedure. Records were assessed for "appropriate pharmacoprophylaxis use," defined primarily per American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines, and reasons for anticoagulant nonuse. The 116 case-control pairs were similar in terms of demographics, surgery type, ACCP risk category, and appropriate pharmacoprophylaxis rates overall. Of the highest-risk patients, respective pharmacoprophylaxis rates among cases and controls were 88% versus 92% among hip/knee replacements and 31% versus 48% among cancer patients. Of the cases and controls who did not receive appropriate pharmacoprophylaxis, only about 25% had documented contraindications. Reviewers identified contraindications in 14% of cases and 9% of controls. Similarities in preventive pPE/DVT practice between cases and controls suggest that pPE/DVTs occur despite implementation of guideline-adherent practices.
    Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources 08/2012; 38(8):348-58.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction and hypothesis: Physicians-in-training play a role in guiding patient care, and their contributions may improve adherence to clinical practice guidelines. However, there is scant information in the literature assessing this impact on perioperative decision-making. The purpose of this study was to determine whether involvement of urogynecology fellows results in closer adherence to guidelines regarding perioperative management of gynecological patients. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing major gynecological surgery between 1 July 2009 and 30 June 2010. Charts were identified using surgical procedure codes (SPT) and subdivided into: urogynecology (fellow co-managed) or private gynecology patients. Information was collected regarding pre- and postoperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, preoperative antibiotic type, dose, and timing. Results: Included were 699 women: 564 (81.2%) private and 135 (19.4%) urogynecology patients. Significant differences were noted in preoperative DVT prophylaxis, with the fellow-managed group being treated appropriately more often (p=0.001). Postoperative management of thromboprophylaxis, however, was not found to be significant (p=0.163). When evaluating antibiotic utilization, both groups were similar with regard to the timing of cephalosporins. However, fellows were significantly superior in dosing antibiotics correctly (p=0.023), and their selection of appropriate antibiotics for penicillin-allergic subjects approached significance (p=0.052). Conclusions: Fellow contributions toward clinical decisions resulted in more appropriate DVT prophylaxis and antibiotic administration prior to gynecological surgery.
    International Urogynecology Journal 11/2012; 24(6). DOI:10.1007/s00192-012-1988-4 · 1.96 Impact Factor
Show more