[Values of clinical signs and rapid diagnostic test in the diagnosis of influenza A (H1N1) new variant in pediatric emergency department.]
Service d'accueil d'urgences pédiatriques, hôpital Nord, chemin des Bourrely, 13015 Marseille, FranceArchives de Pédiatrie (Impact Factor: 0.41). 04/2011; 18(5). DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2011.02.017
AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the values of clinical signs and the rapid diagnostic test (RDT) in the diagnosis of influenza H1N1 new variant in the pediatric emergency room. METHOD: From 18 August to 1st December 2009, children admitted to the pediatric emergency department of CHU Nord (Marseille, France) and suspected of flu according to French guidelines, were tested for influenza using both an influenza RDT and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay specific for H1N1. From 3 November to 3 December, clinical signs were also noted (fever, headaches, myalgia-arthralgia, shivers, diarrhea). RESULTS: A total of 1122 children were tested: 367 children (32.1%) had a positive specific PCR. The RDT value was: sensitivity 65.2% [55.8-73.6], specificity 99.5% [98.1-100], positive predictive value (PPV) 97.5% [91.8-100], negative predictive value (NPV) 91.2% [90.3-91.5], positive likelihood ratio (LRP) 153.7 [53.5-452.9] and negative likelihood ratio (LRN) 0.393 [0.387-0.411]. Clinical data were available for 504 children (328 over 2 years of age). In children more than 2 years of age and in multivariate analysis, headaches were the only sign significantly associated with a positive PCR (aOR=2.53 [1.25-5.12]). Overall, headaches and/or myalgia-arthralgia were valuable indicators for clinical diagnosis of flu, with a 75.8% NPV. Among children with a positive PCR, diarrhea was more frequent in children under 2 years of age (OR=2.76 [1.19-6.40]). The sensitivity of the RDT improved (90.9% [85.2-94.6]) when flu signs were also present. CONCLUSION: Associating clinical signs and RDT for the diagnosis of influenza A (H1N1) new variant in a pediatric emergency room improves selection of children requiring appropriate antiviral treatment.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Timely diagnosis of influenza can help clinical management. To examine the accuracy of rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) in adults and children with influenza-like illness and evaluate factors associated with higher accuracy. PubMed and EMBASE through December 2011; BIOSIS and Web of Science through March 2010; and citations of articles, guidelines, reviews, and manufacturers. Studies that compared RIDTs with a reference standard of either reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (first choice) or viral culture. Reviewers abstracted study data by using a standardized form and assessed quality by using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria. 159 studies evaluated 26 RIDTs, and 35% were conducted during the H1N1 pandemic. Failure to report whether results were assessed in a blinded manner and the basis for patient recruitment were important quality concerns. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 62.3% (95% CI, 57.9% to 66.6%) and 98.2% (CI, 97.5% to 98.7%), respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 34.5 (CI, 23.8 to 45.2) and 0.38 (CI, 0.34 to 0.43), respectively. Sensitivity estimates were highly heterogeneous, which was partially explained by lower sensitivity in adults (53.9% [CI, 47.9% to 59.8%]) than in children (66.6% [CI, 61.6% to 71.7%]) and a higher sensitivity for influenza A (64.6% [CI, 59.0% to 70.1%) than for influenza B (52.2% [CI, 45.0% to 59.3%). Incomplete reporting limited the ability to assess the effect of important factors, such as specimen type and duration of influenza symptoms, on diagnostic accuracy. Influenza can be ruled in but not ruled out through the use of RIDTs. Sensitivity varies across populations, but it is higher in children than in adults and for influenza A than for influenza B. Canadian Institutes of Health Research.Annals of internal medicine 02/2012; 156(7):500-11. DOI:10.1059/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00403 · 17.81 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Influenza is an ongoing public health threat. The accurate diagnosis of influenza is a significant challenge to health care providers, clinical laboratories, and public health officials because the diagnosis of influenza is not easily made on the basis of the clinical presentation alone. Identification of influenza infection as soon as possible after onset of symptoms improves patient management and infection control. Traditional rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs), such as lateral flow immunoassays, are simple to use and provide results in less than 30 minutes at the point of care. These RIDTs are less accurate than more complex, but more definitive, tests performed in centralized laboratories. A new era of influenza diagnostics is emerging in which more accurate and objective next-generation RIDTs, based on fluorescent immunoassay technology, are available. We review recent studies on the performance of this technology and enumerate its advantages compared with traditional RIDTs. This technology offers an opportunity for significant improvement in how influenza is managed.Point of Care The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology 09/2013; 12(3):153-156. DOI:10.1097/POC.0b013e3182a27561
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.