Prevalence of resistance mutations related to integrase inhibitor S/GSK1349572 in HIV-1 subtype B raltegravir-naive and -treated patients

Laboratoire de Virologie, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, UPMC Université Paris 06, INSERM U943, Paris, France.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (Impact Factor: 5.31). 07/2011; 66(7):1481-3. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr152
Source: PubMed


To compare the frequency of previously in vitro-selected integrase mutations (T124A, T124A/S153F, S153Y, T124A/S153Y and L101I/T124A/S153Y) conferring resistance to S/GSK1349572 between HIV-1 subtype B integrase inhibitor (INI)-naive and raltegravir-treated patients.
Integrase sequences from 650 INI-naive patients and 84 raltegravir-treated patients were analysed.
The T124A mutation alone and the combination T124A/L101I were more frequent in raltegravir-failing patients than in INI-naive patients (39.3% versus 24.5%, respectively, P = 0.005 for T124A and 20.2% versus 10.0%, respectively, P = 0.008 for T124A/L101I). The S153Y/F mutations were not detected in any integrase sequence (except for S153F alone, only detected in one INI-naive patient).
T124A and T124A/L101I, more frequent in raltegravir-treated patients, could have some effect on raltegravir response and their presence could play a role in the selection of other mutations conferring S/GSK1349572 resistance. The impact of raltegravir-mediated changes such as these on the virological response to S/GSK1349572 should be studied further.

Download full-text


Available from: Slim Fourati, Oct 01, 2014
1 Follower
80 Reads
  • Source
    • "In contrast, the presence of Q148HRK mutations did lead to further mutations and > 100 FC for DTG susceptibility relative to wild-type in subtype B viruses [63,65]. Interestingly, Q148HRK mutations did not affect susceptibility to DTG in HIV-1 subtype C and HIV-2 isolates [65,75,76]. An ongoing trial termed SPRING-2 will evaluate the use of once-daily DTG versus twice-daily RAL in treatment-naïve patients. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Integration of the viral genome into host cell chromatin is a pivotal and unique step in the replication cycle of retroviruses, including HIV. Inhibiting HIV replication by specifically blocking the viral integrase enzyme that mediates this step is an obvious and attractive therapeutic strategy. After concerted efforts, the first viable integrase inhibitors were developed in the early 2000s, ultimately leading to the clinical licensure of the first integrase strand transfer inhibitor, raltegravir. Similarly structured compounds and derivative second generation integrase strand transfer inhibitors, such as elvitegravir and dolutegravir, are now in various stages of clinical development. Furthermore, other mechanisms aimed at the inhibition of viral integration are being explored in numerous preclinical studies, which include inhibition of 3' processing and chromatin targeting. The development of new clinically useful compounds will be aided by the characterization of the retroviral intasome crystal structure. This review considers the history of the clinical development of HIV integrase inhibitors, the development of antiviral drug resistance and the need for new antiviral compounds.
    BMC Medicine 04/2012; 10(1):34. DOI:10.1186/1741-7015-10-34 · 7.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Changing antiretroviral regimens and the introduction of new antiretroviral drugs have altered drug resistance patterns in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). This review summarizes recent information on antiretroviral drug resistance. As tenofovir and abacavir have replaced zidovudine and stavudine in antiretroviral regimens, thymidine analog resistance mutations have become less common in patients failing antiretroviral therapy in developed countries. Similarly, the near universal use of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI) in place of unboosted PIs has made the selection of PI resistance mutations uncommon in patients failing a first-line or second-line PI regimen. The challenge of treating patients with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 has largely been addressed by the advent of newer PIs, second-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and drugs in novel classes, including integrase inhibitors and CCR5 antagonists. Resistance to these newer agents can emerge, however, resulting in the appearance of novel drug resistance mutations in the HIV-1 polymerase, integrase and envelope genes. New drugs make possible the effective treatment of multidrug-resistant HIV-1, but the activity of these drugs may be limited by the appearance of novel drug resistance mutations.
    12/2011; 1(6):582-9. DOI:10.1016/j.coviro.2011.10.020
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Development of new antiretroviral drugs which are highly potent, tolerable over the long term and with a high genetic barrier to resistance is essential for the treatment of a chronic viral disease that requires life-long therapy with near-perfect medication adherence. Integrase inhibitors (INI) are a new class of antiretroviral drugs that block the action of HIV integrase, which catalyses several key steps in the virus life cycle which are essential for insertion of the viral genome into the DNA of host cell. AREAS COVERED: Dolutegravir (DTG), a second-generation INI currently in the late stage of clinical development, is an effective orally available drug with a long half-life that does not need to be pharmacologically enhanced, is effective as a once daily drug in the absence of INI resistance mutations and twice daily in presence of INI resistance mutations. EXPERT OPINION: DTG, as other drugs in the INI class, appears safe and well tolerated. Results from ongoing large Phase III studies will bring more generalizable and robust information on the long-term effects of DTG.
    Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 03/2012; 21(4):523-30. DOI:10.1517/13543784.2012.661713 · 5.53 Impact Factor
Show more