Hormone replacement therapy in gynecologic cancer survivors: Why not?
ABSTRACT As a result of treatment, many women with gynecologic malignancies will go through menopause and display climacteric symptoms at an earlier age than occurs naturally. Iatrogenic menopause may adversely affect quality of life and health outcomes in young female cancer survivors. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has often been withheld from women with gynecologic cancer because of concern that it might increase the risk of relapse or the development of new primary cancers. The purpose of this review was to examine the published literature on menopause management in gynecologic cancer survivors and highlight the risks and benefits of conventional and alternative HRT in this population.
A comprehensive literature search of English language studies on menopause management in gynecologic cancer survivors and women with a hereditary predisposition to a gynecologic malignancy was performed in MEDLINE databases through December 2010.
Both our review and a 2008 Cochrane review of randomized trials on the effects of long-term HRT demonstrate that for menopausal women in their 40s or 50s with and without gynecologic cancer, the absolute risks of estrogen-only HRT are low. Several prospective observational studies and randomized trials on HRT use in women with a genetic predisposition for or development of a gynecologic malignancy suggest benefits in quality of life with no proven adverse oncologic effects as a result of short-term HRT use.
In select women, it is reasonable to discuss and offer conventional HRT for the amelioration of menopausal symptoms and to improve quality of life. HRT does not appear to increase the risk of gynecologic cancer recurrences; however, this conclusion was largely based on observational data and smaller prospective studies.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: There are over one million survivors from gynecologic malignancies currently living in the United States and this population is expected to increase by 33% over the next decade. Identifying the needs of these cancer survivors is often understudied and overlooked. METHODS: A literature review using MEDLINE was searched for research articles published in English from 1967 to 2013 focusing on survivorship care in women with gynecologic malignancies. RESULTS: For women with gynecologic malignancies, the survivorship period requires management of several aspects of care. Improved coordination of care between providers that may be addressed with the use of survivorship care plans and should include surveillance recommendations. Providers should conduct a focused evaluation of late and long-term effects of cancer that may continue to effect patients during and after treatment. Opportunities to improve lifestyle behaviors and continue general health maintenance should also be maximized. CONCLUSIONS: The survivorship period incorporates the following: prevention of new cancer diagnoses, surveillance for recurrence, assessment and management of side effects from cancer and cancer treatment, and the coordination of care between patients and healthcare providers. Focusing on these components may improve quality of life as it allows for a seamless transition for cancer survivors and their caregivers.Gynecologic Oncology 05/2013; 130(2). DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.05.022 · 3.69 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Treatment of gynecological cancer has significant impact on a woman's quality of life because it commonly includes removal of the uterus and ovaries, both being the core of a woman's femininity, whilst irradiation and chemotherapy, be they as primary therapy or when indicated as postoperative adjuvant therapy, will lead to ablation of ovarian function if the ovaries had not been removed. This will lead to an acute onset of menopausal symptoms, which may be more debilitating than those occurring as a result of natural aging, and of which hot flushes, night sweats, insomnia, mood swings, vaginal dryness, decreased libido, malaise and a general feeling of apathy are the most common. About 25% of gynecological cancers will occur in pre- and perimenopausal women, a large percentage of whom will become menopausal as a result of their treatment. There are also the gynecological cancer survivors who are not rendered menopausal as a result of the treatment strategy but who will become menopausal because of natural aging. Concern among the medical attendants of these women is whether use of estrogen therapy or estrogen and progestogens for their menopausal symptoms will reactivate tumor deposits and therefore increase the rate of recurrence and, as a result, decrease overall survival among these women. Yet the data that are available do not support this concern. There are eight retrospective studies and only one randomized study that have analyzed outcome in endometrial cancer survivors who used hormone therapy after their surgery, whilst, among ovarian cancer survivors, there are four retrospective studies and one randomized study. The studies do suffer from small numbers and, although the studies pertaining to endometrial cancer analyze mostly women with early-stage disease, a number of the studies in both the endometrial and ovarian cancer survivors do have a sizeable follow-up. These studies seem to support that estrogen therapy after the treatment for gynecological cancer does not impact negatively on outcome in endometrial and ovarian cancer survivors and that estrogen therapy can be considered as a plausible therapeutic option in survivors who are debilitated by their menopausal symptoms. It is prudent not to offer estrogen therapy to survivors of endometrial stromal sarcoma and women with granulosa cell tumors of the ovaries. Vulval, vaginal and cervical cancers are not considered hormone-dependent and therefore estrogen therapy can be given.Climacteric 08/2013; 16(6). DOI:10.3109/13697137.2013.806471 · 2.24 Impact Factor