The Importance Of Transitional Care In Achieving Health Reform

School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.64). 04/2011; 30(4):746-54. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0041
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Under the Affordable Care Act of 2010, a variety of transitional care programs and services have been established to improve quality and reduce costs. These programs help hospitalized patients with complex chronic conditions-often the most vulnerable-transfer in a safe and timely manner from one level of care to another or from one type of care setting to another. We conducted a systematic review of the research literature and summarized twenty-one randomized clinical trials of transitional care interventions targeting chronically ill adults. We identified nine interventions that demonstrated positive effects on measures related to hospital readmissions-a key focus of health reform. Most of the interventions led to reductions in readmissions through at least thirty days after discharge. Many of the successful interventions shared similar features, such as assigning a nurse as the clinical manager or leader of care and including in-person home visits to discharged patients. Based on these findings, we recommend several strategies to guide the implementation of transitional care under the Affordable Care Act, such as encouraging the adoption of the most effective interventions through such programs as the Community-Based Care Transitions Program and Medicare shared savings and payment bundling experiments.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Among these diseases, heart failure (HF) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are the most common causes of hospitalization. Therefore, readmission for HF and AMI is receiving increasing attention. Several socioeconomic factors could affect readmissions in this target group, and thus, a systematic review was conducted to identify the effect of socioeconomic factors on the risk for readmission in people aged 65 years and older with HF or AMI. Methods: The search was carried out by querying an electronic database and hand searching. Studies with an association between the risk for readmission and at least one socioeconomic factor in patients aged 65 years or older who are affected by HF or AMI were included. A quality assessment was conducted independently by two reviewers. The agreement was quantified by Cohen’s Kappa statistic. The outcomes of studies were categorized in the short-term and the long-term, according to the follow-up period of readmission. A positive association was reported if an increase in the risk for readmission among disadvantaged patients was found. A cumulative effect of socioeconomic factors was computed by considering the association for each study and the number of available studies. Results: A total of eleven articles were included in the review. They were mainly published in the United States. All the articles analyzed patients who were hospitalized for HF, and four of them also analyzed patients with AMI. Seven studies (63.6%) were found for the short-term outcome, and four studies (36.4%) were found for the long-term outcome. For the short-term outcome, race/ethnicity and marital status showed a positive cumulative effect on the risk for readmission. Regarding the educational level of a patient, no effect was found. Conclusion: Among the socioeconomic factors, mainly race/ethnicity and marital status affect the risk for readmission in elderly people with HF or AMI. Multidisciplinary hospital-based quality initiatives, disease management, and care transition programs are a priority for health care systems to achieve better coordination.
    Clinical Interventions in Aging 01/2015; 10:237. DOI:10.2147/CIA.S71165 · 1.82 Impact Factor
  • New England Journal of Medicine 02/2015; 372(7):678-82. DOI:10.1056/NEJMms1410321 · 54.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to implement and evaluate a care delivery model integrating the registered nurse care coordinator (RNCC) into a family practice that is certified as a patient-centered medical home (PCMH) by the National Committee for Quality Assurance. The initial target population was the 937 patients with diabetes in the family practice. A pre-post design was used to assess changes in patients' diabetic quality indicators after integrating the role of RNCC using existing staff. This 6-month project compared the following diabetic quality indicators: blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg, hemoglobin A1c ≤7, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL, documentation of smoking cessation counseling, and aspirin prescription if existing vascular disease. Yearly documentation of microalbuminurea level, and filament foot and retinal examination was assessed. Patient and health care team satisfaction also was measured. Care coordination interventions included: telehealth, group visits, standardized individual patient education, as well as creative uses of the electronic medical record for workflow changes, daily huddles, and monthly meetings. The results were positive, statistically significant differences in the pre and post scores for A1c (P=.001, n=790), foot exam (P=.001, n=850), and microalbumin (P=.01, n=850). Post intervention, patient and health care team satisfaction with the RNCC role was high (mean scores ≥3 on a 5-point Likert scale). Integrating the RNCC within a multidisciplinary team in the PCMH had a significant positive impact on diabetic quality indicators. Patient and health care team satisfaction with the RNCC role was high. (Population Health Management 2015;xx:xxx-xxx).
    Population Health Management 01/2015; DOI:10.1089/pop.2014.0131 · 1.35 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jul 28, 2014