Article

How A Regional Collaborative Of Hospitals And Physicians In Michigan Cut Costs And Improved The Quality Of Care

BlueCross and Blue Shield of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.64). 04/2011; 30(4):636-45. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0526
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There is evidence that collaborations between hospitals and physicians in particular regions of the country have led to improvements in the quality of care. Even so, there have not been many of these collaborations. We review one, the Michigan regional collaborative improvement program, which was paid for by a large private insurer, has yielded improvements for a range of clinical conditions, and has reduced costs in several important areas. In general and vascular surgery alone, complications from surgery dropped almost 2.6 percent among participating Michigan hospitals-a change that translates into 2,500 fewer Michigan patients with surgical complications each year. Estimated annual savings from this one collaborative are approximately $20 million, far exceeding the cost of administering the program. Regional collaborative improvement programs should become increasingly attractive to hospitals and physicians, as well as to national policy makers, as they seek to improve health care quality and reduce costs.

1 Follower
 · 
161 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Eptifibatide, a small-molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, is conventionally administered as a bolus plus infusion. A growing number of clinicians are using a strategy of catheterization laboratory-only eptifibatide (an off-label use) as procedural pharmacotherapy for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention although the comparative effectiveness of this approach is unknown. We compared the in-hospital outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention across 47 hospitals and treated with eptifibatide bolus plus infusion with those treated with a catheterization laboratory-only regimen. We used optimal matching to link the use of catheterization laboratory-only eptifibatide with clinical outcomes, including mortality, myocardial infarction, bleeding, and need for transfusion. Of the 84 678 percutaneous coronary interventions performed during 2010 to 2011, and meeting our inclusion criteria, eptifibatide was administered to 21 296 patients. Of these, a catheterization laboratory-only regimen was used in 4511 patients, whereas 16 785 patients were treated with bolus plus infusion. In the optimally matched analysis, compared with bolus plus infusion, a catheterization laboratory-only regimen was associated with a reduction in bleeding (optimally matched adjusted odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.93; P=0.014) and need for transfusion (optimally matched adjusted odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.92; P=0.012), with no difference in mortality or myocardial infarction. A catheterization laboratory-only eptifibatide regimen is commonly used in clinical practice and is associated with a significant reduction in bleeding complications in patients undergoing contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention. © 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.
    Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 02/2015; 8(2). DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001880 · 6.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A strong relationship between hospital caseload and adverse outcomes has been demonstrated for pancreatic resections. Participation in regional surgical collaboratives may mitigate this phenomenon. This study sought to investigate changes over time in adverse outcomes after pancreatectomy across hospitals with different caseloads in a statewide surgical collaborative. The study investigated patients undergoing pancreatic resection from January 2008 to August 2013 at Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) hospitals (1007 patients in 19 academic and community hospitals). Risk-adjusted rates of major complications, mortality, and failure to rescue were compared between hospitals based on caseloads (low, medium, and high) in early (2008-2010) and later (2011-2013) periods. Finally, the degree to which different complications explained changes in hospital outcome variation was assessed. Adjusted rates of major complications and mortality decreased over time, driven largely by improvements at low-caseload hospitals. In 2008-2010, risk-adjusted major complication rates were higher for low-caseload than for high-caseload hospitals (27.8 vs. 17.8 %; p = 0.02). However, these differences were attenuated in 2011-2013 (22.2 vs. 20.0 %; p = 0.74). Similarly, adjusted mortality rates were higher in low-caseload hospitals in 2008-2010 (6.2 vs. 0.8 %; p = 0.02), but these differences were attenuated in 2011-2013 (3.3 vs. 1.1 %; p = 0.18). Variation in major complications decreased, largely due to decreased variation in "medical" complication rates, with less change in surgical-site complications. Participation in regional quality collaboratives by lower-volume hospitals can attenuate the volume-outcome relationship for pancreatic surgery. Continued work in collaboratives with an emphasis on technical and intraoperative aspects of care may improve overall quality of care.
    Annals of Surgical Oncology 03/2015; DOI:10.1245/s10434-015-4529-9 · 3.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous studies of checklist-based quality improvement interventions have reported mixed results. To evaluate whether implementation of a checklist-based quality improvement intervention-Keystone Surgery-was associated with improved outcomes in patients in a large statewide population undergoing general surgery. A retrospective longitudinal study examined surgical outcomes in 64 891 Michigan patients in 29 hospitals using Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative clinical registry data from 2006 through 2010. Multivariable logistic regression and difference-in-differences analytic approaches were used to evaluate whether Keystone Surgery program implementation was associated with improved surgical outcomes following general surgery procedures, apart from existing temporal trends toward improved outcomes during the study period. Risk-adjusted rates of superficial surgical site infection, wound complication, any complication, and 30-day mortality. Implementation of Keystone Surgery in 14 participating centers was not associated with improvements in surgical outcomes during the study period. Adjusted rates of superficial surgical site infection (3.2% vs 3.2%, P = .91), wound complication (5.9% vs 6.5%, P = .30), any complication (12.4% vs 13.2%, P = .26), and 30-day mortality (2.1% vs 1.9%, P = .32) at participating hospitals were similar before and after implementation. Difference-in-differences analysis accounting for trends in 15 nonparticipating centers and sensitivity analysis excluding patients receiving surgery in the first 6 or 12 months after program implementation yielded similar results. Implementation of a checklist-based quality improvement intervention did not affect rates of adverse surgical outcomes among patients undergoing general surgery in participating Michigan hospitals. Additional research is needed to understand why this program was not successful prior to further dissemination and implementation of this model to other populations.
    01/2015; 150(3). DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2873

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
114 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014