Article

The association between neighbourhoods and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of multi-level studies.

Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 2.16). 05/2011; 25(3):236-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01192.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Many studies have examined the role of neighbourhood environment on birth outcomes but, because of differences in study design and modelling techniques, have found conflicting results. Seven databases were searched (1900-2010) for multi-level observational studies related to neighbourhood and pregnancy/birth. We identified 1502 articles of which 28 met all inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was used to examine the association between neighbourhood income and low birthweight. Most studies showed a significant association between neighbourhood factors and birth outcomes. A significant pooled association was found for the relationship between neighbourhood income and low birthweight [odds ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval: 1.02, 1.20] whereby women who lived in low income neighbourhoods had significantly higher odds of having a low birthweight infant. This body of literature was found to consistently document significant associations between neighbourhood factors and birth outcomes. The consistency of findings from observational studies in this area indicates a need for causal studies to determine the mechanisms by which neighbourhoods influence birth outcomes.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
80 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As a biologically-mediated pathway between adversity and declines in physical health, allostatic load has been frequently hypothesized as a potential contributor to racial disparities in birth outcomes, but an empirical evidence is lacking. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between maternal preconception allostatic load, race, and adverse birth outcomes within the context of neighborhood-level poverty using data from the Bogalusa Heart Study. Allostatic load was quantified as a count of regulatory biomarkers falling in the highest risk quartile of the sample distribution as measured from a physical examination that took place prior to conception. Consistent with previous findings, African American women resided in more impoverished neighborhoods and had higher allostatic load scores compared to whites; however, allostatic load was not associated with preterm birth or low birth weight in fully adjusted models. These results underscore a need for further refinement of both biologic and contextual measures that capture holistically the way in which stressful conditions and experiences encountered across the life-course influence health potentials and engender inequities in reproductive health outcomes.
    Health & Place 10/2013; 24C:260-266. · 2.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the prevalence of fetal growth restriction (FGR) and small for gestational age (SGA) in France and other populations, the risk factors associated with SGA and its impact on fetal well-being and obstetrical outcome. A critical review of studies identified from searches of PubMed and the Cochrane libraries using the following keywords "intra-uterine growth retardation", "intra-uterine growth restriction", "small for gestational age", "epidemiology", "risk factors", "pregnancy outcome", "maternal morbidity", "perinatal death". Studies of FGR use multiple definitions, both with respect to cutoffs for defining restricted growth as well as growth norms; however the most common definition for epidemiological research was SGA using a birthweight less than the 10th percentile. Following this definition, SGA births accounted for 8.9% of all live births in 2010 in France. Major risk factors identified in the literature were previous SGA birth (4 fold increase in risk) (LE2), diabetes and vascular diseases (5 fold) (LE3), chronic hypertension (2 fold) (LE2), preeclampsia (5 to 12 fold according to severity) (LE2), pregnancy induced hypertension (2 fold) (LE2), smoking (2-3 fold) (LE2), drug and alcohol use (2-4 fold) (LE2), maternal age over 35 (3 fold) (LE2) and ethnic origin (2-3 fold for African-American or Asian origins) (LE2). Other risk factors with adjusted odds ratios around 1.5 were primiparity (LE2), multiple pregnancy (but only starting at 30 weeks of gestation) (LE2), socioeconomic disadvantage (LE2) and body mass index (BMI<18.5kg/m(2)) (LE2) SGA is associated with a four-fold increased risk of stillbirth (LE2) as well as higher rates of cesarean and induced labor before 37 weeks. FGR is a complication of pregnancy with adverse consequences for fetal wellbeing. Sociodemographic and clinical risk factors can help to identify pregnant women at risk for this complication.
    Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 11/2013; · 0.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A large body of research has shown that health is influenced by disadvantaged living conditions, including both personal and neighborhood conditions. Little is however known to what degree the health impact of different forms of disadvantage differ along the life course. The present study aims to examine when, during the life course, neighborhood and individual disadvantages relate to functional somatic symptoms. Participants (n = 992) came from The Northern Swedish Cohort and followed from age 16, 21, 30 until 42 years. Functional somatic symptoms, socioeconomic disadvantage, and social and material adversity were measured through questionnaires and linked to register data on neighborhood disadvantage. Data was analyzed with longitudinal and cross-sectional multilevel models. Results showed that neighborhood disadvantage, social and material adversity and gender all contributed independently to overall levels of symptoms across the life course. Cross-sectional analyses also suggested that the impact of disadvantage differed between life course periods; neighborhood disadvantage was most important in young adulthood, and the relative importance of material versus social adversity increased as participants grew older. In summary, the study suggests that disadvantages from different contextual sources may affect functional somatic health across the life course, but also through life course specific patterns.
    PLoS ONE 01/2014; 9(6):e99558. · 3.53 Impact Factor