Article

Relaciones entre iguales, conducta prosocial y género desde la educación primaria hasta la universitaria en Colombia

Universitas Psychologica (Colombia) Num.2 Vol.9 01/2009;
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT Relaciones entre iguales, categoría sociométrica, conducta prosocial, conducta antisocial, género, popular, rechazado, excluido, controvertido, Relaciones humanas, conducta prosocial [apa psynet], conducta antisocial, sociometría. Relaciones entre iguales, categoría sociométrica, conducta prosocial, conducta antisocial, género, popular, rechazado, excluido, controvertido, Relaciones humanas, conducta prosocial [apa psynet], conducta antisocial, sociometría. Relaciones entre iguales, categoría sociométrica, conducta prosocial, conducta antisocial, género, popular, rechazado, excluido, controvertido, Relaciones humanas, conducta prosocial [apa psynet], conducta antisocial, sociometría.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
61 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Peer relations researchers generally agree that friendship involves a close, mutual, dyadic relationship. However, the lack of consensus on how to operationalize this construct has limited our understanding of the role of friendship in social adjustment. The present study directly compared the psychometric properties (i.e., number of friendships identified, concordances, and stability) of the five major different definitions of friendship used in the literature. Fourth- and fifth-grade students (N = 90) completed a battery of sociometric measures at two different times separated by eight weeks. Friendship dyads were then identified using the following definitional criteria: (1) mutual positive nominations; (2) mutal high ratings (i.e., 4 or 5 on a five-point Likert-type scale); (3) one positive nomination reciprocated by a rating of 5; (4) one positive nomination and mutual high ratings; and (5) one positive nomination and mutual ratings averaging at least 4. Frequency and concordance analyses indicated differences across the five definitions. In addition, the friendships identified by each of the five definitions were similarly moderate in their stability. Explanations for, and the possible implications of, these differences are discussed.
    Review of Social Development 12/2001; 7(1):62 - 71. · 1.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the present study the relationship between leadership behavior and sociometric status among preschool children was examined. Leadership behaviors of 24 6-year-old Japanese children were observed during free play and scored on the basis of a 2-dimensional leadership scale (facilitation of play and consideration-evaluation of playmates; Fukada, Fukada, & Hicks, 1994). Participants were categorized into three sociometric-status groups. Children who had high sociometric status showed higher scores on both leadership dimensions than those with low sociometric status.
    The Journal of Genetic Psychology 12/1997; 158(4):481-6. · 0.83 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study was designed to examine 8-12-year-olds' peer assessments of prosocial behaviour and their relationship to self-assessments, teacher-assessments and peer acceptance. Although prosocial behaviour has been studied for many years, it has been narrowly operationalised and research has tended to lack ecological validity. To rectify these weaknesses, child-generated normative prosocial behaviours were used to generate peer nomination items for the purpose of rating children's performance of prosocial behaviour in peer interactions. Children also filled out self-ratings of social behaviour and peer sociometric nominations. Teachers assessed children's social behaviour, rating the same child-generated prosocial behaviours. Popular children were rated as significantly more prosocial than all other sociometric groups and rejected children were rated as significantly less prosocial than all other groups. The highest correlation was found between teacher and peer reports of prosocial behaviour. Self-ratings and peer-ratings of prosocial behaviour were significantly related, as were self-ratings and teacherratings of prosocial behaviour. Implications of research findings are discussed.
    Journal of Moral Education 01/2000; 29(1):47-60. · 0.69 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
5 Downloads
Available from