Impact of 'traffic-light' nutrition information on online food purchases in Australia

WHO Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention, Deakin University, Victoria.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 1.9). 04/2011; 35(2):122-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00684.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT 'Traffic-light' nutrition labelling has been proposed as a potential tool for improving the diet of the population, yet there has been little published research on the impact of traffic-light nutrition labelling on purchases in a supermarket environment. This study examined changes to online consumer food purchases in response to the introduction of traffic-light nutrition information (TLNI).
The study consisted of a 10-week trial in a major Australian online grocery store. For the duration of the trial TLNI in the form of four colour-coded indicators representing the products' relative levels of fat, saturated fat, sugar and sodium content, was displayed on the product listing page of 53 of the retailer's own-brand products in five food categories (milk, bread, breakfast cereals, biscuits and frozen meals). The changes in sales before and after the introduction of TLNI were examined both within the intervention store and in a comparison store.
TLNI had no discernible impact on sales, with the change in sales in the intervention store corresponding to changes in sales in the comparison store. No relationship was observed between changes in sales and the relative healthiness of products.
This limited, short-term study found no evidence to support the notion that TLNI is likely to influence behaviour change. Further research is needed to examine the impact of providing TLNI in different contexts, for a longer duration and on more products, with and without complementary awareness and information campaigns.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The pressure to find solutions for high rates of obesity and overweight in the U.S. population has led industry groups to introduce voluntary front-of-package (FOP) nutritional labeling for beverages. This research examines the impact of these labels on consumers' perceptions of the healthiness of beverages. Though consumers reacted differently depending on the information in the label, in general, the perception of milks and 100% juices decreased, while perception of soft drinks and less than 100% juice drinks increased. If the purpose of FOP labels is to encourage healthier choices, the changes observed appear to be at odds with the goal.
    Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 12/2012; 34(4):599-614. DOI:10.1093/aepp/pps037 · 1.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nutrition information on packaged foods supplies information that aids consumers in meeting the recommendations put forth in the US Dietary Guidelines for Americans such as reducing intake of solid fats and added sugars. It is important to understand how food label use is related to dietary intake. However, prior work is based only on self-reported use of food labels, making it unclear if subjective assessments are biased toward motivational influences. We assessed food label use using both self-reported and objective measures, stage-of-change, and dietary quality in a sample of 392 stratified by income. Self-reported food label use was assessed using a questionnaire. Objective use was assessed using a mock shopping task in which participants viewed food labels and decided which foods to purchase. Eye movements were monitored to assess attention to nutrition information on the food labels. Individuals paid attention to nutrition information when selecting foods to buy. Self-reported and objective measures of label use showed some overlap with each other (r=0.29, p<0.001), and both predicted dietary quality (p<0.001 for both). Stage of change diminished the predictive power of subjective (p<0.09), but not objective (p<0.01), food label use. These data show both self-reported and objective measures of food label use are positively associated with dietary quality. However, self-reported measures appear to capture a greater motivational component of food label use than do more objective measures.
    Nutrients 01/2015; DOI:10.3390/nu7021068 · 3.15 Impact Factor
  • CAB Reviews Perspectives in Agriculture Veterinary Science Nutrition and Natural Resources 06/2012; 7(031). DOI:10.1079/PAVSNNR20127031


Available from
Nov 7, 2014