Percutaneous Repair or Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation

Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL 60201, USA.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 54.42). 04/2011; 364(15):1395-406. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009355
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Mitral-valve repair can be accomplished with an investigational procedure that involves the percutaneous implantation of a clip that grasps and approximates the edges of the mitral leaflets at the origin of the regurgitant jet.
We randomly assigned 279 patients with moderately severe or severe (grade 3+ or 4+) mitral regurgitation in a 2:1 ratio to undergo either percutaneous repair or conventional surgery for repair or replacement of the mitral valve. The primary composite end point for efficacy was freedom from death, from surgery for mitral-valve dysfunction, and from grade 3+ or 4+ mitral regurgitation at 12 months. The primary safety end point was a composite of major adverse events within 30 days.
At 12 months, the rates of the primary end point for efficacy were 55% in the percutaneous-repair group and 73% in the surgery group (P=0.007). The respective rates of the components of the primary end point were as follows: death, 6% in each group; surgery for mitral-valve dysfunction, 20% versus 2%; and grade 3+ or 4+ mitral regurgitation, 21% versus 20%. Major adverse events occurred in 15% of patients in the percutaneous-repair group and 48% of patients in the surgery group at 30 days (P<0.001). At 12 months, both groups had improved left ventricular size, New York Heart Association functional class, and quality-of-life measures, as compared with baseline.
Although percutaneous repair was less effective at reducing mitral regurgitation than conventional surgery, the procedure was associated with superior safety and similar improvements in clinical outcomes. (Funded by Abbott Vascular; EVEREST II number, NCT00209274.).

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mitral regurgitation (MR) represents the second most frequent valvular heart disease. The appropriate management of organic MR remains unclear in many aspects, especially in several specific clinical scenarios. This review aims to discuss the current guideline recommendations regarding the management of organic MR, while highlighting the controversial aspects encountered in daily clinical practice. The role of imaging is essential in establishing the most appropriate type of surgical treatment (repair or replace), which is based on morphological mitral valve (MV) characteristics (reparability of the valve) and local surgical expertise in valve repair. The potential advantages of 3-dimensional echocardiography in assessing the MV are discussed. Other modern imaging techniques (tissue Doppler and speckle tracking) may provide additional useful information in borderline cases. Exercise echocardiography (evaluating MR severity, pulmonary pressure, or right ventricular function) may have an important role in the management of difficult cases. Finally, the moment when surgery is no longer an option and alternative solutions should be sought is also discussed. Although in everyday clinical practice the timing of surgery is not always straightforward, some newer clinical and echocardiographic indicators can guide this decision and help improve the outcome of these patients.
    Korean Circulation Journal 03/2015; 45(2):96-105. DOI:10.4070/kcj.2015.45.2.96
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is strongly related to outcome in cardiovascular diseases. The relationship between treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR) and renal function is not well described. We sought to evaluate renal function before and after mitral valve repair by the MitraClip device. Patients with moderate-to-severe or severe (3+ or 4+, respectively) MR by core laboratory determination who underwent transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip device in multicenter, investigational trials were included in this study. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was evaluated before and at hospital discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year after mitral valve repair. Eight hundred fifty-four patients with baseline mean eGFR 61.5±23.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) were studied, including 438 (51.3%) with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (CKD stage 1 or 2), 371 (42.6%) with eGFR 30 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (CKD stage 3), and 52 (6.1%) with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (CKD stage 4 or 5). Baseline renal dysfunction was more prevalent in older patients with a history of heart failure, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. Baseline eGFR was associated with 1-year survival (P<0.001) after MitraClip repair. At 1-year follow-up, the mean change in eGFR for the overall cohort was -1.0±15.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2); for patients with CKD stage 1 or 2, stage 3, or stage 4 or 5, mean change was -4.1±16.6, +2.6±12.4, and +4.8±9.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. Linear mixed effect modeling demonstrated a strong association between MR and eGFR, and a statistically significant improvement in eGFR in patients with CKD stage 4 or 5 associated with MR reduction to ≤2+ (P=0.007). Renal dysfunction is associated with lower survival in patients with severe MR even after percutaneous mitral valve repair. Reduction in MR severity by the MitraClip device is associated with improvement in renal function at 1 year in patients with baseline renal dysfunction. Unique identifiers: NCT00209274, NCT01931956, NCT01940120. © 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.
    Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 12/2015; 8(1). DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.001349 · 6.98 Impact Factor
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology 06/2014; 63(22):2438-2488. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.537 · 15.34 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 30, 2014