Article

Subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and their differing responses to therapy.

Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Nature medicine (Impact Factor: 28.05). 04/2011; 17(4):500-3. DOI: 10.1038/nm.2344
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is a lethal disease. Overall survival is typically 6 months from diagnosis. Numerous phase 3 trials of agents effective in other malignancies have failed to benefit unselected PDA populations, although patients do occasionally respond. Studies in other solid tumors have shown that heterogeneity in response is determined, in part, by molecular differences between tumors. Furthermore, treatment outcomes are improved by targeting drugs to tumor subtypes in which they are selectively effective, with breast and lung cancers providing recent examples. Identification of PDA molecular subtypes has been frustrated by a paucity of tumor specimens available for study. We have overcome this problem by combined analysis of transcriptional profiles of primary PDA samples from several studies, along with human and mouse PDA cell lines. We define three PDA subtypes: classical, quasimesenchymal and exocrine-like, and we present evidence for clinical outcome and therapeutic response differences between them. We further define gene signatures for these subtypes that may have utility in stratifying patients for treatment and present preclinical model systems that may be used to identify new subtype specific therapies.

1 Bookmark
 · 
219 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Improved usage of the repertoires of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) profiles is crucially needed to guide the development of predictive and prognostic tools that could inform the selection of treatment options. Using publicly available mRNA abundance datasets, we performed a large retrospective meta-analysis on 466 PDAC patients to discover prognostic gene signatures. These signatures were trained on two clinical cohorts (n = 70), and validated on four independent clinical cohorts (n = 246). Further validation of the identified gene signature was performed using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. We identified 225 candidate prognostic genes. Using these, a 36-gene signature was discovered and validated on fully independent clinical cohorts (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.51 to 2.81, P = 3.62 × 10(-6), n = 246). This signature serves as a good alternative prognostic stratification marker compared to tumour grade (HR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.45 to 2.88, P = 3.18 × 10(-5)) and tumour node metastasis (TNM) stage (HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.66 to 1.94, P = 0.67). Upon multivariate analysis with adjustment for TNM stage and tumour grade, the 36-gene signature remained an independent prognostic predictor of clinical outcome (HR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.17 to 4.16, P = 0.01). Univariate assessment revealed higher expression of ITGA5, SEMA3A, KIF4A, IL20RB, SLC20A1, CDC45, PXN, SSX3 and TMEM26 was correlated with shorter survival while B3GNT1, NOSTRIN and CADPS down-regulation was associated with poor outcome. Our 36-gene classifier is able to prognosticate PDAC independent of patient cohort and microarray platforms. Further work on the functional roles, downstream events and interactions of the signature genes is likely to reveal true molecular candidates for PDAC therapeutics.
    Genome Medicine 01/2014; 6(12):105. · 4.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Die molekularen Veränderungen in soliden und zystischen Pankreastumoren sind in den letzten Jahren zunehmend charakterisiert worden. Das duktale Pankreaskarzinom zeichnet sich durch zahlreiche Punktmutationen und z. T. auch Deletionen und Amplifikationen von Genen aus, welche mindestens 13 tumorrelevante zelluläre Prozesse betreffen. Neben den 4 führenden Alterationen in den KRAS-, p53-, CDKN2a- und SMAD4-Genen gibt es zahlreiche Treibermutationen mit geringer Frequenz. Fortschritte sind bei der Subklassifikation der duktalen Pankreaskarzinome aufgrund von Genexpressionssignaturen zu verzeichnen, wobei ein KRAS-getriebener klassischer und ein KRAS-unabhängiger quasimesenchymaler Subtyp beschrieben wurden. Durch die Analyse von mRNA- und MicroRNA-Expressionsprofilen aus Punktaten ist die Grundlage für eine präoperative Artdiagnose von Pankreasraumforderungen geschaffen worden. Die 4 häufigsten zystischen Pankreastumoren besitzen z. T. entitätsspezifische genetische Veränderungen, wie z. B. GNAS-Mutationen in intraduktal papillär muzinösen Neoplasien, β-Catenin-Mutationen in solidpseudopapillären Neoplasien und VHL-Punktmutationen oder „loss of heterozygosity“ in serösen Zystadenomen. Da die Zystenflüssigkeiten aus zystischen Pankreastumoren diagnostisch verwertbare DNA enthalten, besteht die Möglichkeit einer verbesserten präoperativen Unterscheidung der zystischen Pankreastumoren aufgrund von Mutationsanalysen. Zusätzlich zu DNA-basierten Verfahren gibt es viel versprechende Ansätze für die präoperative Unterscheidung benigner und prämaligner/maligner zystischer Pankreastumoren aufgrund von MicroRNA-Signaturen. In den letzten Jahren wurden wichtige Fortschritte bei der molekularen Charakterisierung der Pankreastumoren und hinsichtlich der Methodik der präoperativen molekularen Analyse erzielt. Diese Ergebnisse geben uns Hoffnung, dass präoperative molekulare Verfahren die prognostische/therapeutische Stratifizierung duktaler Pankreaskarzinome und eine sichere präoperative Diagnostik benigner zystischer Pankreastumoren in der Zukunft ermöglichen. Abstract Genetic alterations of solid and cystic tumors of the pancreas have been increasingly more characterized over the last few years. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) carries numerous point mutations and, to a lesser extent, deletions and amplifications of genes that are associated with at least 13 tumor relevant signalling pathways and processes. Besides the four common driver mutations in the KRAS, p53, CDKN2a and SMAD4 genes there are a number of low frequency driver mutations. The classification of PDAC subtypes has benefited from recent analyses of transcriptional profiles that revealed a classical KRAS driven and a KRAS independent quasi-mesenchymal subtype. The analyses of mRNA and miRNA expression profiles of fine needle aspirates serve as a basis for reliable preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic masses. The four most common cystic pancreatic tumors bear tumor-specific genetic alterations, such as GNAS mutations in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, β-catenin mutations in solid pseudopapillary neoplasms and VHL mutations or loss of heterozygosity in serous cystadenoma. Recovery of DNA from aspirates of cyst fluids enables an improved preoperative management of cystic pancreatic tumors by mutational analysis. In addition to the analysis of DNA there are promising approaches in distinguishing benign and premalignant/malignant cystic tumors by evaluating miRNA profiles. In recent years much progress has been made in molecular genetic characterization and preoperative evaluation of pancreatic tumors. Hopefully these results will contribute to prognostic and therapeutic stratification of PDAC and to a reliable preoperative diagnostics of benign cystic pancreatic tumors in the future.
    Der Pathologe 11/2013; 34(S2):214-220. · 0.64 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A nearly universal feature of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an extensive presence of activated stroma. This stroma is thought to aid in various tumor-promoting processes and hampers response to therapy. Here, we aim to evaluate the evidence that supports this role of the stroma in PDAC with functional experiments in relevant models, discuss the clinical trials that have aimed to target the stroma in this disease, and examine recent work that explains why these clinical trials based on stroma-targeting strategies have thus far not achieved the expected success. We systematically searched PubMed through August 2014 with no restrictions to identify published peer-reviewed research articles assessing the effect of targeting the stroma on tumor growth or metastases in preclinical animal models. Five hundred and thirty articles were extracted of which 31 were included in the analysis. Unfortunately, due to the large variety in models and outcome measures, we could not perform a meta-analysis of our data. We find that despite an abundance of positive outcomes reported in previous studies on stroma targeting, a strong discrepancy exists with the outcomes of clinical trials and the more recent preclinical work that is in line with these trials. We explain the incongruities by the duration of stroma targeting and propose that chronic stroma targeting treatment is possibly detrimental in the treatment of this disease.
    Cancer and metastasis reviews 01/2015; · 6.45 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
35 Downloads
Available from
May 28, 2014